Page 1 of 1

9th Circuit Court backs off...

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:36 am
by streetsoldier
Today, the 9th Circuit Court issued a "stay" on its order to prohibiit the recitation of the entire Pledge of Allegiance; this is the face of a possible Supreme Court test, and the fact that the U.S. Senate voted 99-0 to authorize the Pledge as now written.

There is also a movement to protect the Pledge of Allegiance by petition for a Constitutional Amendment; this can be found at http://www.wepledge.com for those who are interested.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:46 am
by firefighter16
A stay? What does that mean. They should have never brought it up in the first place.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:53 am
by streetsoldier
A "stay" means that, for the time being, the Court will not require enforcement...note that this is something this Court said they wouldn't do.

Can you say "Caught with your pants down?" :wink:

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 8:16 am
by chadtm80
hehehe..... probably were geting threats

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 10:56 am
by mf_dolphin
Usually a court will not issue a stay on it's own ruling uless it feels there is a fair chance of the decision being overturned by a higher court.

What idiots!

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 11:07 am
by Rainband
I think the people trying to change "The pledge of Allegiance" need to pledge allegiance someplace else!!!!!!! :x :x :x



Johnathan :wink:

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 11:59 am
by pojo
Amen to Rainband!

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:04 pm
by Stephanie
Thanks for the information and the thread for the petition!

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:11 pm
by mf_dolphin
I signed the petition! :D

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:17 pm
by pojo
me too and I passed the link on.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:22 pm
by Rainband
Me too!!! :wink:



Johnathan

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:25 pm
by chadtm80
signed and mailed to all my contacts

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:28 pm
by gator
What's the point of issuing a stay? If you render a ruling, stick with it. If it needs to be overturned, then overturn it and admit you were wrong. Such "iffy-ness" demonstrated by the 9th shows just how little thought has gone into their verdict...

A little backbone, please?

- gator.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2003 10:45 pm
by pojo
One of my friends emailed me his comments about this situation. Just a fair warning, he is a reporter for the campus newspaper and the campaign secretary for one of people running for mayor of Green Bay.

"Sadly, this is the way the world is going. We must have complete secular states, with no references to any religion, belief or what not. I was deeply saddened when the U.S. Supreme Court said they would not listen to the complaint. Yet at the same time, it is understandable, considering what they have on their plates right now, affirmative action in colleges. From a political point of view and from someone who works in the "system" these little grassroots movements are nice and meaningful, but the government as Congress and the Executive Branch, has their hands tied as of now. They have no jurisdiction over this.

After spending too many years at a Catholic school, I realize that religion is important. No, I'm not a preacher or a door-to-door-religion salesman and I'm not a part of Pat Roberson's 700 club, but as Americans, we should be allowed to have the "Under God" section being said, and we should definitely have the 10 commandments wherever neccesary. Religion isn't bad...it's only bad where it interferes with democracy.

So what can we do? The biggest thing we can do is raise awareness. Without awareness, the courts may think the arguement is null and void. To keep awareness, we need letters to the editors in major media, we need letters send to supreme court justices and we definitely need to keep saying what we believe in, "One nation, under God."

Just some random thoughts"

FYI...That was NOT me on that comment, that was one of my friends.