Page 1 of 2
FBI: Terrorists could use planes as weapons
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:21 pm
by ameriwx2003
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:24 pm
by CaptinCrunch
do you think.......Duh 9-11
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:24 pm
by GalvestonDuck
Crunch...you beat me to it. That was my first thought.

"Duh!"
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:30 pm
by GalvestonDuck
In the article, Stolley wrote:The FBI said that components of IEDs can be smuggled onto planes concealed in clothing or personal carry-on items like shampoo and medicine bottles, and then put together onboard.
Sheesh! Pretty soon, we're not going to be able to take ANYTHING with us on the plane or if we can, we'll have to wait through cantankerously long search lines. :o
Additionally, she wrote:"In many cases of suspicious passenger activity incidents have taken place in the aircraft's forward lavatory," the FBI noted. "It is conceivable terrorists may plan to use this private area to construct IED(s) in order to facilitate access to the cockpit, or position themselves in front of the passengers.''
Wasn't there some Steven Seagal or Jean Claude VanDamme (I get those two mixed up) movie where a trio of terrorists snuck components of a homemade gun on board? I don't remember all of it, but I remember an Asian female in the bunch. She went to the lavatory, pulled out a curling iron from her backpack, and then opened the end and the barrel of the pistol was inside. She then took all the other parts that her two accomplices had hidden in the lavatory earlier and put them together to form her gun.
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:30 pm
by Lindaloo
Hmmm.... are those cowards still spewing that? As if we did not already know that. BRING IT ON!!
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:31 pm
by BEER980
I would be more worried about MANPADS then another hijack situation.
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:33 pm
by Stephanie
CaptinCrunch wrote:do you think.......Duh 9-11
My thoughts exactly!

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:34 pm
by stormraiser
LOL. Me, too. Great minds think alike.
GalvestonDuck wrote:Crunch...you beat me to it. That was my first thought.

"Duh!"
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:36 pm
by GalvestonDuck
Answered my own question when I went to IMDB.com. I believe the movie was "Executive Decision." I like action films and, IMO, Seagal's better than Van Damme, although nowhere near as great as Harrison Ford or Bruce Willis...and maybe Stallone.
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:44 pm
by ameriwx2003
Well.. you would think Duh wouldn't you but there where warnings before 9/11 that planes could be used as weapons and it still happened;):)
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:08 pm
by Stephanie
ameriwx2003 wrote:Well.. you would think Duh wouldn't you but there where warnings before 9/11 that planes could be used as weapons and it still happened;):)
You're right about that...it just seems like the FBI has finally joined the party!

Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:10 pm
by wx247
BEER980 wrote:I would be more worried about MANPADS then another hijack situation.
What are MANPADS?
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 8:14 pm
by David
They'll do this.. they'll do that.. oh come on it already happened!
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:32 pm
by Lindaloo
wx247 wrote:What are MANPADS?
Yeah, what are MANPADS?
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 9:45 pm
by ameriwx2003
Yeah, what are MANPADS
I agree MANPADS pose a big risk as well.. Stephanie yes your right.. the FBI is just now connecting some of the dots

:)
anyways a link about MANPADS below:):)
http://www.janes.com/security/internati ... _1_n.shtml
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 10:41 pm
by GalvestonDuck
Weird. Seems like MANSAMs would make more sense.
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 10:42 pm
by Lindaloo
Alright DARNIT!! What are MANPADS?
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2003 10:48 pm
by ameriwx2003
Linda..

:)
here is the link talking about MANPADS:)::):)
http://www.janes.com/security/internati ... _1_n.shtml
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:13 am
by ColdFront77
Linda... here is the post above from Mike, as well.
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2003 4:43 am
by stormraiser
Yes, Duck, MANSAMs would make more sense. But in a world that doesn't make sense..............