This ticks me off!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
This ticks me off!
Orlando officials never raised the local terror alert when they were instructed to by administration. Sherriff says there was no reason to be on higher alert and that he was saving taxpayers money by not raising it.
Well BS.. i dont want know cowboy thinking he knows better than the Goverment. If they say we need to be in elevated well then dam it, you do so...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- As the nation's terror alert level remains at high, Orange County officials are defending their decision not to raise the local readiness level.
Although, local theme parks have been identified in the past as potential terror targets, Orange County Chairman Rich Crotty said security has not been compromised, WESH NewsChannel 2 reported.
Administrators said the move saved taxpayers more than $300,000 in extra fire-rescue and security expenses in the last 10 days alone.
"Do we have structures that symbolize our great country, like Cinderella's castle? I suppose you could make that case, but there was no specific threat that warranted the raising of that level," Crotty said.
Well BS.. i dont want know cowboy thinking he knows better than the Goverment. If they say we need to be in elevated well then dam it, you do so...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- As the nation's terror alert level remains at high, Orange County officials are defending their decision not to raise the local readiness level.
Although, local theme parks have been identified in the past as potential terror targets, Orange County Chairman Rich Crotty said security has not been compromised, WESH NewsChannel 2 reported.
Administrators said the move saved taxpayers more than $300,000 in extra fire-rescue and security expenses in the last 10 days alone.
"Do we have structures that symbolize our great country, like Cinderella's castle? I suppose you could make that case, but there was no specific threat that warranted the raising of that level," Crotty said.
Last edited by chadtm80 on Fri Feb 28, 2003 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- mf_dolphin
- Category 5
- Posts: 17758
- Age: 68
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
- Location: St Petersburg, FL
- Contact:
- gator
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 2:09 pm
- Location: Saranac Lake, NY
- Contact:
Safety is a tricky issue for folks to agree upon.
On one hand, you want things to be as safe as possible.
Preventing harm and damage, and being able to handle, as best as possible, situations where one or both have occured.
On the other, you don't want to give up your freedoms.
To say what you want, and believe what you want, and not have your rights or privacy violated.
While there is no "right" or "wrong" place on this continuum of priorities, there is an underlying point to be made here.
I want you to ask yourself the following question:
How safe is safe enough?
Military planes flying constantly over landmarks and populated areas?
Armed guards on every streetcorner?
Monitoring all financial transactions of non-citizens?
Implanted tracking devices on all foreign visitors?
Intensive background checks for all people crossing into the US?
Intensive scrutiny and searching of all freight that crosses into the US?
Having all of the above occur for ALL US Citizens...?
What will it take for you to feel safe...?
And are YOU willing to foot the bill to make these things happen...?
- gator.
On one hand, you want things to be as safe as possible.
Preventing harm and damage, and being able to handle, as best as possible, situations where one or both have occured.
On the other, you don't want to give up your freedoms.
To say what you want, and believe what you want, and not have your rights or privacy violated.
While there is no "right" or "wrong" place on this continuum of priorities, there is an underlying point to be made here.
I want you to ask yourself the following question:
How safe is safe enough?
Military planes flying constantly over landmarks and populated areas?
Armed guards on every streetcorner?
Monitoring all financial transactions of non-citizens?
Implanted tracking devices on all foreign visitors?
Intensive background checks for all people crossing into the US?
Intensive scrutiny and searching of all freight that crosses into the US?
Having all of the above occur for ALL US Citizens...?
What will it take for you to feel safe...?
And are YOU willing to foot the bill to make these things happen...?
- gator.
0 likes
I do not know the in's and out's of the American political system, but surley if an order was issued from the president, a loley sherif does not have the power to ignore it? I think that was very stupid thing to do, especially when DISNEY is a very big symbol of America. If you say to someone in SA or London have you heard of Disney, they are going to say Yes, on the other hand I never knew about the world trade center before I moved here.
Bring that sheriff here to me Chad so I can kick his dumb ol ass.!
Bring that sheriff here to me Chad so I can kick his dumb ol ass.!
0 likes
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
That is a bunch of crap. He needs to follow instructions. I hope he finds himself out of a job soon.
Garrett
Garrett

0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Stephanie
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23843
- Age: 62
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
- Location: Glassboro, NJ
Homeland security is important and everyone should follow what the federal government tells us to do.
HOWEVER, the federal government needs to show the local governments the money in order to make sure that we are ready if God forbid anything does happen. It's easy to create news rules and regulations, but it also takes the almighty $$$ to fund them. we'll be paying for it one way or another. Maybe that surplus would've served us better if it was left alone.
HOWEVER, the federal government needs to show the local governments the money in order to make sure that we are ready if God forbid anything does happen. It's easy to create news rules and regulations, but it also takes the almighty $$$ to fund them. we'll be paying for it one way or another. Maybe that surplus would've served us better if it was left alone.
0 likes
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
The money argument doesn't really work. Law enforcement officials are paid to take care of us and that INCLUDES homeland security. I realize that it costs a lot of money and the administration has not shown them the money, but to not increase security AT ALL is risky, inappropriate, and unintelligent!
Garrett
Garrett

0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- streetsoldier
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 9705
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Under the rainbow
All that needs to be done with this sheriff is for any person or group who has first-hand knowledge of his "malfeasance" to file a writ of certiorari with the State Attorney General; this office will "pull" his badge and disarm him, pending investigation which could lead to removal and criminal charges.
I had to do this once with an out-of-control, gun-happy "town marshal"...I know whereof I speak.
I had to do this once with an out-of-control, gun-happy "town marshal"...I know whereof I speak.
0 likes
- wx247
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 14279
- Age: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
- Location: Monett, Missouri
- Contact:
Nice to know something can be done like that Streetsoldier. And I am assuming that the sherrif talked to the press, which was stupid.
Garrett :23:
Garrett :23:
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests