Page 1 of 3

Arrest warrant issued for Michael Jackson

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 11:25 am
by stormchazer
Authorities to Discuss Jackson Ranch Raid

Wednesday, November 19, 2003



SANTA BARBARA, Calif. — Santa Barbara County law-enforcement authorities were expected to provide more information on the search of pop superstar Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch at a press conference Wednesday.

Jackson's own public-relations machine was still recovering from reports that the search the day before was related to abuse allegations made by a boy.

"The warrant stated that it was in response to a complaint of a male child, 12 years old, who claims that there was sexual molestation that took place at Neverland Ranch (search)," attorney Brian Oxman, who said he had represented the Jackson family for 14 years, told a morning television news show Wednesday.

Court TV reported that an arrest warrant had been issued for Jackson.

The press conference was scheduled to take place at 2 p.m. EST (11 a.m. PST) on Wednesday.

Sixty to 70 personnel from the Santa Barbara County sheriff's and district attorney's offices served a warrant about 8:30 a.m. PST Tuesday as part of an "ongoing criminal investigation," Sgt. Chris Pappas said.

Pappas said no warrant had been issued for Jackson's arrest and no arrests were made during the search, which lasted through the night.

• For more on the possible allegations, see Foxnews.com's 411.

Oxman himself was not representing Michael Jackson, though he said he had spoken with members of Jackson's family.

"It is very upsetting to them," he said on another morning news show Wednesday. "They are just really very shocked by this entire incident and they go, 'Here we go again. Michael is just a sitting target for people to take potshots at him.'"

Jackson's own spokesman, Stuart Backerman, released a statement to the media Tuesday night that read in part, "I've seen lawyers who don't represent me and spokespeople who do not know me speaking for me."

Backerman refused to comment on any allegations and said neither he nor Jackson knew the details of the investigation. He added that the 45-year-old singer and his three young children had spent the last three weeks in Las Vegas for the production of a music video.

Numerous sources told Fox News and other media outlets that the search indeed did stem from a child-molestation allegation.

The search came on the same day Epic Records released "Number Ones," a greatest hits collection featuring Jackson's new single, "One More Chance." On Nov. 26, CBS is scheduled to air a Jackson special consisting mainly of old concert footage.

The $12.3 million Santa Ynez Valley (search) property, which has a mansion, its own zoo and amusement park with bumper cars, a merry-go-round and Ferris wheel, has often been the site of children's parties. Investigators searched only select locations on the property, said sheriff's Cmdr. Bill Byrne.

A source told Michael Bryant, a correspondent for the syndicated "Extra" television show, that the boy said to be behind the alleged accusations recently approached a Los Angeles law firm and claimed inappropriate conduct by the pop superstar.

A rival TV show, "Celebrity Justice," reported that it was the 12-year-old boy's revelations during a therapy session that were behind Tuesday's search warrant, the show's producers said to Foxnews.com.

The boy, who had spent time at Neverland Ranch, entered therapy several months ago and disclosed information the therapist felt compelled to report to authorities, according to "Celebrity Justice" sources.

Under California law, if a health-care practitioner "knows or reasonably suspects" a child to be a victim of abuse, the practitioner must report the abuse to law enforcement authorities "as soon as practically possible."

News of the raid came as a "complete surprise" to Jackson, a source close to the pop star told Foxnews.com's Roger Friedman.

After word of the search spread, a motley array of Jackson supporters hastily arranged a press conference in Las Vegas Tuesday afternoon.

One woman, Donna Green, said she was a big Jackson fan who had gotten the chance to meet and speak with the singer several times over the years. She was simply there to show her support, she said, and wore a button calling for an end to the "child-abuse circus."

"We love him very much," she said. "He's the nicest man I've ever met. He's not this weird person they make him out to be." She said the timing of the raid struck her as "convenient" since it coincides with the release of his latest album, "Number Ones."

If the reports of child-molestation allegations are true, it would be the second time the pop singer has faced such an accusation. In 1994, he reportedly paid about $20 million to a 14-year-old boy to settle a case in which criminal charges were never filed.

In the criminal complaint filed in that case, the boy claimed Jackson kissed and molested him on several occasions while the two were in bed together and said he once took a bath with the pop singer. He said the situation got "out of hand."

Jackson's had international hits with the albums "Thriller" (1982), "Bad" (1987) and "Dangerous" (1991) saw his career begin to collapse after the 1993 allegations.

The pop singer's sometime spiritual advisor, Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (search), told Fox News he had tried to counsel him about being more responsible.

"I have sent him many messages," the rabbi said on Fox News. "We're not just talking about the fall of a business. We're talking about the fall of a human being."

Added Boteach: "He's not a child, he's an adult, and he has to accept" the consequences of his actions.

Uri Geller (search), a controversial self-styled psychic and paranormalist who said he was a longtime friend of Jackson's, told Fox News that if the allegations were of a sexual nature, he would not be able to believe they were true.

"I'm a father myself and I would never associate myself with anyone who would do anything with a child," said Geller, describing Jackson as "gullible, innocent, maybe a little confused ... but I would never believe he would sexually abuse a child."

Last year there was a public outcry after Jackson, a former child star, stunned fans by dangling his baby, whom he reportedly calls "Blanket," from a hotel window in Germany. The child's face was covered with a towel.

Jackson called the incident a "terrible mistake," and Berlin authorities said the actions were not punishable.

Not much is known about Prince Michael II, whose mother has not been identified. The singer's 6-year-old son, Prince Michael I, and 5-year-old daughter, Paris, were born during his marriage to Debbie Rowe, his plastic surgeon's nurse, which ended in 1999.

He was also married to Lisa Marie Presley, Elvis Presley's daughter, between 1994 and 1996.

Jackson routinely keeps the children's heads covered with cloth while escorting them in public — and he usually sports a surgical mask himself when out and about. He has said he wants to protect them from the public eye.

As of December 2002, when Jackson interacted with young fans outside a lawsuit hearing in Santa Maria, Calif., he was still inviting children to his home for parties.

Jackson is also connected to Hollywood private eye Anthony Pellicano (search), who began serving federal prison time Monday for possessing illegal explosives. Pellicano is being investigated about whether he secretly taped conversations of celebrities and their lawyers, but has refused to name his clients.

Pellicano, 59, worked for Jackson as a spokesman and security consultant during the abuse investigation.

The "King of Pop" amassed a half-billion-dollar fortune over the past 20 years, but his former financial advisers have said, in a lawsuit last spring, that he is saddled with debt and teetering near bankruptcy. Current financial advisers have denied that claim.

Jackson has appeared weak and ghostly pale at many of his recent public appearances, and his own attorneys have said has been involved in nearly 1,000 lawsuits.

In June, he suffered a suspected anxiety attack during a visit to Indianapolis to deliver a deposition in a lawsuit and his doctor said the singer was weak, dizzy and dehydrated.

In a separate Santa Maria lawsuit hearing earlier this year, the singer hobbled into court on crutches with his left foot wrapped in bandages because of swelling from what he described as a spider bite and delayed testimony because he said he was too ill to appear in court.

When he did finally testify, he giggled during questioning and made comical faces at people in the courtroom.

In a television documentary broadcast earlier this year, Jackson said he had slept in a bed with many children. "When you say bed, you're thinking sexual," the singer said during the interview. "It's not sexual — we're going to sleep. I tuck them in. ... It's very charming, it's very sweet."

Fox News' Marla Lehner, Catherine Donaldson-Evans, Trace Gallagher, Jennifer D'Angelo, Paul Wagenseil and The Associated Press contributed to this report.




Search sources include Google, Ask Jeeves, WebCrawler


Advertise on FOXNews.com
Jobs at FOX News Channel. Internships at FOX News Channel.
Terms of use. Privacy Statement. For FOXNews.com comments write to
foxnewsonline@foxnews.com; For FOX News Channel comments write to
comments@foxnews.com
© Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2003 ComStock, Inc.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Copyright 2003 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved.
All market data delayed 20 minutes.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 11:58 am
by GalvestonDuck
His sometime spiritual advisor is a rabbi?? I thought Jackson was a Jehovah's Witness. His gender is non-specific, his race is non-specific, and his faith is non-specific. This guy is a smorgasbord of characters all rolled into one.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 12:04 pm
by bfez1
I heard on CNN and Fox News last night that an arrest warrant was issued for Michael Jackson and that he could be arrested today in Las Vegas where he is working right now and that if he would have been at "Neverland" he would have been arrested there.

I agree GalvestonDuck

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:33 pm
by george_r_1961
Duck i couldnt agree with you more. Why dont we throw all his personalities in a nice jail cell? Lets see if he buys his way out of this one.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:35 pm
by Lindaloo
Turns out it is not just one count of child molestation but "multiple" accounts. The DA used the magic word which means there has been an "ongoing" investigation of Jackson since the first allegation of child molestation, regardless of the settlement. Hmmmm...

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:41 pm
by Rainband
If he is guilty then He needs to go away for a lonnnnggggg time. Answer me this where were the parents of these victims when this occured??? :roll: :roll:

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:44 pm
by Lindaloo
I believe that this is part of the first allegation Rainband. There are probably more children involved that are now cooperating with law enforcement. There have been no civil cuits filed that I know of which means they are giving info. I still can't figure out why that little boy needed therapy. :roll:

Even though there was a settlement the police never stopped investigating.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:57 pm
by Rainband
Why would parents os a suspected child molester let their children go near MJ..in the first place. And the news conference was a joke . These are serios charges and children suffered if they are true. Yet the DA and Sheriff were laughing and joking..very unproffessional imho. It seemed like they were enjoying themselves too much IMHO.. You don't laugh and joke about child molestation

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 2:58 pm
by stormraiser
Last I heard (within the past couple of weeks) he was in cahoots with the Scientologists, but no matter what, he's sure one messed up dude.
GalvestonDuck wrote:His sometime spiritual advisor is a rabbi?? I thought Jackson was a Jehovah's Witness. His gender is non-specific, his race is non-specific, and his faith is non-specific. This guy is a smorgasbord of characters all rolled into one.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 3:01 pm
by Rainband
Lindaloo wrote:I believe that this is part of the first allegation Rainband. There are probably more children involved that are now cooperating with law enforcement. There have been no civil cuits filed that I know of which means they are giving info. I still can't figure out why that little boy needed therapy. :roll:

Even though there was a settlement the police never stopped investigating.
I still cant figure out why parents would settle monetarily if their kid was molested...maybe thats why :roll: If he's guilty he needs to go away for life but some things just don't make sense especially the DA and sheriff's jovial attitudes.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 3:03 pm
by george_r_1961
Any parent that accepts a monetary settlement from that freak ought to have their head examined.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 3:04 pm
by Rainband
george_r_1961 wrote:Any parent that accepts a monetary settlement from that freak ought to have their head examined.
Exactly

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 3:08 pm
by Lindaloo
Good point Rainband. But, did you ever think that this "Mother" was out for the money from the get go? Or it was hush money.

I believe that these charges are from the first time before all the parents knew he may have been sexually abusing their children.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:12 pm
by Amanzi
Rainband wrote:If he is guilty then He needs to go away for a lonnnnggggg time. Answer me this where were the parents of these victims when this occured??? :roll: :roll:


EXACTLY!!!!

No way in this life time I would let my son go hang out in some strange guys house... famos or not! I hope the parents of these kids get raked over the coals for being irrisponsible! JMHO

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:57 pm
by Rainband
Lindaloo wrote:Good point Rainband. But, did you ever think that this "Mother" was out for the money from the get go? Or it was hush money.

I believe that these charges are from the first time before all the parents knew he may have been sexually abusing their children.
You mean from the first Investigation that he was never charged..if thats the case it may make sense. It will be interesting to see what happens but that idiot DA needs to change his attitude or he is gonna blow the case...I mean come on you don't make jokes during a "press" conference about alleged molestation :x I am not a parent but that just pissed me off :grr:

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 4:59 pm
by GalvestonDuck
I still don't get why he was never charged the first time. It only went to civil court, but he was never charged criminally.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/mjcivil1.html

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 5:00 pm
by Lindaloo
I did not get to view the press conference but from what I hear the DA put on one hell of a comedy show. That is not good when serious charges like this are being introduced to the public. Hopefully, when I get home they will show at least exerts from the press conference.



Shawn, because of the civil suit that was filed and was settled. The accusers did not cooperate with authorities after the money was paid. The Mother no longer wanted to pursue charges.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 5:12 pm
by Rainband
Lindaloo wrote:I did not get to view the press conference but from what I hear the DA put on one hell of a comedy show. That is not good when serious charges like this are being introduced to the public. Hopefully, when I get home they will show at least exerts from the press conference.



Shawn, because of the civil suit that was filed and was settled. The accusers did not cooperate with authorities after the money was paid. The Mother no longer wanted to pursue charges.
They also said they passed a law because of the 92-93 case, minors have to testify and I guess the one case in 92-93 that was settled the minor didn't want to. Lindaloo YOU don't wanna see the press conference it will PISS YOU OFF :x I am still fuming

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 5:13 pm
by GalvestonDuck
Ah...gotcha, Linda. Makes sense now.

As for the DA at the press conference, I heard part of it. One of the things he said was something about how some people were saying that the allegations came out on the same day that MJ's newest album "One More Chance" was due to be released and that it was a smear campaign. He said that that wasn't true and then he added something like "I don't even listen to his music anyway" or something crass like that and the reporters and he all laughed about it.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 5:27 pm
by Lindaloo
Thanks for the warning Rainband.

Well, before I crucify him I want to hear some more evidence.