
5.3 earthquake in Los Angeles
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- furluvcats
- Category 5
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 12:02 am
- Location: Temecula, California
- Contact:
- furluvcats
- Category 5
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 12:02 am
- Location: Temecula, California
- Contact:
Sunday was my first quake in the states...felt many in Costa Rica in 79 or 80.... but it alarms me that I had my first 2 quakes in just a few days, after living in so cal for over a year now... So, I am alarmed, as are many many so cal residents....I don't buy the crap that its nothing unusual...its unusual compared to the past year I've experienced here....
0 likes
- feederband
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
- furluvcats
- Category 5
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 12:02 am
- Location: Temecula, California
- Contact:
- feederband
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
feederband wrote:Kind of concerned that there might be a bigger picture we are not seeing . The amount of quakes seem to be on the rise. Seems like they have been on the rise ever since the South East Asia quake in December..Or just more tv coverage......
There is a bigger picture. There could be a earthquake/tsunami disaster event on the 25th or 26th from what I have been reading. The last two weeks have been busy in the ring of fire as well.
0 likes
BEER980 wrote:
There is a bigger picture. There could be a earthquake/tsunami disaster event on the 25th or 26th from what I have been reading. The last two weeks have been busy in the ring of fire as well.
Hopefully it occurs away from the city, the epicenter that is.

Hmmmm....25th/26th? 6 months after the Indonesian dissaster.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38118
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
BEER980 wrote:feederband wrote:Kind of concerned that there might be a bigger picture we are not seeing . The amount of quakes seem to be on the rise. Seems like they have been on the rise ever since the South East Asia quake in December..Or just more tv coverage......
There is a bigger picture. There could be a earthquake/tsunami disaster event on the 25th or 26th from what I have been reading. The last two weeks have been busy in the ring of fire as well.
Those are impossible to predict. Especially specific dates.
0 likes
#neversummer
Brent wrote:BEER980 wrote:feederband wrote:Kind of concerned that there might be a bigger picture we are not seeing . The amount of quakes seem to be on the rise. Seems like they have been on the rise ever since the South East Asia quake in December..Or just more tv coverage......
There is a bigger picture. There could be a earthquake/tsunami disaster event on the 25th or 26th from what I have been reading. The last two weeks have been busy in the ring of fire as well.
Those are impossible to predict. Especially specific dates.
Starting to get very worried:
West Coast Earthquakes Worry
Scientists
Scientists are unsure about whether or not
the recent spate of earthquakes that have
rumbled along the western Pacific Rim are
connected or not.
If they are connected, they could be
precursors to a major event sometime
soon, such as slippage along the unstable
Juan de Fuca plate off the US Pacific
Northwest.
A 7.8 quake on June 13 in Chile has been
followed by a 6.8 quake on June 14 in
Alaska, then a 7.4 quake on the 15th off
the coast of northern California, which
resulted in a brief tsunami warning along
regional coasts, and, as of today, June 16,
a 5.3 event in the Los Angeles area.
None of the quakes caused serious
damage, but the cluster in time has
seismologists watching the situation closely.
The US Geological Survey has rolled out a
new, online, real-time earthquake
prediction map for California showing the
probability of earthquake shaking over the
next 24-hours. The new online map shows
a clickable map of all of California, and is
based on previous earthquake sequences.
The system uses seismic information
networks combined with known patterns of
aftershocks to show the probability of
additional shaking in the next 24 hours.
Right now, the map predicts a 10-40%
chance of a quake south and east of Los
Angeles within the next 24 hours.
---
Additionally...
Dee Rohe wrote:
inspectorsky1
From: "Larry W. Taylor" <From_The_Edge@...> [Offline] Offline
Date: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:02 pm
Subject: Stan Deyo Indicates Current EQ Data [Send Email] Send
Very Disturbing
On June 15, 2005 Q-Files Program
scientist, Stan Deyo, Colorado;
indicated his current data of the
Earthquake Shaker Data is very
disturbing. Deyo issued a Watch
for the Pacific & Atlantic Coasts
of US/Canada, along wth careful
consideration of New Madrid Fault
areas! Stan Deyo indicated he had
never seen such data building as
this, especially after the recent
7.0 Quake off California Coast which he had issued Warnings. Deyo
indicated this was a Heads-Up to be
prepared and watchful as possible
in the next few days for an active continuation of the Earthquake
activity around the US and Pacific
Rim.
<http://standeyo.com>
Steve Quayle posts the Deyo Warnings:
<http://stevequayle.com>
and regularly gives EQ Information
and Data on The Q-Files Program:
Shortwave Frequency: 7.465 mhz.
Monday-Friday at 6:00pm Central Time.
And the psychics are off-the-charts in their terror. I've visited one site for months and I have never before seen them so terrified.
One predicted a major June 22nd earthquake in California and another with a good record predicted a 9.2. for August 14,2005 that would cause a tsunami for all of North/Central and South America west coasts and spread to Asia.
I usually don't believe them but it's time to watch very closely. What I pay attention to more is those two articles above.
Please be safe everyone!

0 likes
- feederband
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
- streetsoldier
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 9705
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
- Location: Under the rainbow
- feederband
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 3423
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Lakeland Fl
- furluvcats
- Category 5
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2003 12:02 am
- Location: Temecula, California
- Contact:
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38118
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
jason0509 wrote:One predicted a major June 22nd earthquake in California and another with a good record predicted a 9.2. for August 14,2005 that would cause a tsunami for all of North/Central and South America west coasts and spread to Asia.
Oh Puh-leeze.
This reminds me of those "End of the world" predictions on those crazy tabloids you see while waiting in line at the grocery store.

0 likes
#neversummer
Brent,
Need I remind you of the 9.15 Indian Ocean Earthquake and resulting Tsunami that killed 200,000+ people.
Large scale earthquakes are not impossible and if you look at the cluster of earthquakes throughout the pacific rim recently (Chile, California, Alaska, Washington State), there is certainly cause for concern.
I don't understand how you can so confidently believe that the pacific coast is not at risk after these events. Also, take a look at the California earthquake map for just today, the 18th (there about 50 earthquakes listed there). I've checked out that map for years now just for fun and it's rarely been this active.
Lastly, my thoughts are not based on the psychic. They are based on the two articles I posted first. ALSO, there was a cluster of small earthquakes in the Northridge area the week before the 6.7.
If we get to September 1,2005 without the big one, that's great.
To assume that a 9.0 earthquake can't happen on the pacific coast of North America is baffling. It's happened before, in the 1700's and involved the Juan De Fuca plate. I've grown up in a earthquake-prone area and have studied them forever so I'm not some type of crazy.
P.S.: Before 9/11, the people that set off alarm bells about Osama Bin Laden were dismissed too. Al Qaeda could never strike the U.S. in a devastating fashion, it was said.
Need I remind you of the 9.15 Indian Ocean Earthquake and resulting Tsunami that killed 200,000+ people.
Large scale earthquakes are not impossible and if you look at the cluster of earthquakes throughout the pacific rim recently (Chile, California, Alaska, Washington State), there is certainly cause for concern.
I don't understand how you can so confidently believe that the pacific coast is not at risk after these events. Also, take a look at the California earthquake map for just today, the 18th (there about 50 earthquakes listed there). I've checked out that map for years now just for fun and it's rarely been this active.
Lastly, my thoughts are not based on the psychic. They are based on the two articles I posted first. ALSO, there was a cluster of small earthquakes in the Northridge area the week before the 6.7.
If we get to September 1,2005 without the big one, that's great.
To assume that a 9.0 earthquake can't happen on the pacific coast of North America is baffling. It's happened before, in the 1700's and involved the Juan De Fuca plate. I've grown up in a earthquake-prone area and have studied them forever so I'm not some type of crazy.
P.S.: Before 9/11, the people that set off alarm bells about Osama Bin Laden were dismissed too. Al Qaeda could never strike the U.S. in a devastating fashion, it was said.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38118
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
jason0509 wrote:Brent,
Need I remind you of the 9.15 Indian Ocean Earthquake and resulting Tsunami that killed 200,000+ people.
Large scale earthquakes are not impossible and if you look at the cluster of earthquakes throughout the pacific rim recently (Chile, California, Alaska, Washington State), there is certainly cause for concern.
I don't understand how you can so confidently believe that the pacific coast is not at risk after these events. Also, take a look at the California earthquake map for just today, the 18th (there about 50 earthquakes listed there). I've checked out that map for years now just for fun and it's rarely been this active.
Lastly, my thoughts are not based on the psychic. They are based on the two articles I posted first. ALSO, there was a cluster of small earthquakes in the Northridge area the week before the 6.7.
If we get to September 1,2005 without the big one, that's great.
To assume that a 9.0 earthquake can't happen on the pacific coast of North America is baffling. It's happened before, in the 1700's and involved the Juan De Fuca plate. I've grown up in a earthquake-prone area and have studied them forever so I'm not some type of crazy.
P.S.: Before 9/11, the people that set off alarm bells about Osama Bin Laden were dismissed too. Al Qaeda could never strike the U.S. in a devastating fashion, it was said.
I never said that... My point was, what's with the predictions? The exact dates? The guarantees??? It's going to happen but picking a date out of the sky to send people into a panic isn't helping.
0 likes
#neversummer
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests