Will US USe Military Action Against Iran ?

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Iran Attack?

Poll ended at Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:42 pm

Before the end of the year
4
44%
Early 2006
4
44%
Not at all
1
11%
 
Total votes: 9

Message
Author
User avatar
canegrl04
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2486
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Texas

Will US USe Military Action Against Iran ?

#1 Postby canegrl04 » Sat Aug 13, 2005 5:42 pm

When Will US or Israel go after Iran?
0 likes   

User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

#2 Postby BEER980 » Sat Aug 13, 2005 5:53 pm

It may be sooner then you think.
0 likes   

User avatar
feederband
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Lakeland Fl

#3 Postby feederband » Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:25 pm

Iran would have to do something incredibly stupid for us to go after them Israel has said before it would take out Iran's nuclear plant like it did to Iraq if it was to go fully online ...They consider it a direct threat...
0 likes   

kevin

#4 Postby kevin » Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:39 pm

I do not think we will have to attack Iran to contain their threat, however I would not say that force is unthinkable with this administration. Neither do I believe we will wait out the diplomatic options if it becomes apparent to the hawks in Washington (as it no doubt already has), that Iran is going to NEED to be taken out.

While our military capabilities will be much the same in two years, the Iranians can build up proportionally a lot more by consolidating command and communication infrastructure. Also the Iranians if they are smart are already spreading out special forces and implementing ways for them to take command of regular units in key areas in the event of war. We have seen in the Second Iraqi War that Saddam Feddayeen were the most potent fighting force, able to strike at our supply lines and hold down forces in choke points like Al Qasr. Therefore the Iranians have a lot to gain by waiting and getting ready, whereas we have nothing really to gain IF war is inevitable.

Conflict is inevitable in some measure. This is a realist assumption. The Iranians and the West pursue different national interests. Especially America and the Iranians have different ideas about how regional relationships should exist. Because the Iranians aid terrorism with hamas and hezbollah, they are in direct opposition to our foreign policy. Yet while the Iranian government pursues goals which are against our national interests, we must decide the action to take which will support our national interests. There is more at stake than a small desert quarrel, and if we become overstretched, Paul Kennedy offers a simple prediction : we will find our place in the sun nibbled away.

I think the clear way to solve this problem is to engage Iran at all levels. They must understand that there are ways out of this mess. They can develop nuclear energy but it must be civilian, it cannot be tied to their military. They must be offered economic incentives in return for oversight, and know that should they not agree to those terms, their oil will not be bought. They must understand the overwhelming military power of the United States, and this can be done by moving carrier groups. Also they must know that while the Europeans might not act militarily, we are willing to in case sanctions do not stop their development process. Iran cannot be allowed to get near having a nuclear weapon, if they do Israel will attack.. and it is doubtful that there would not be war.

Taking a hard line with Iran is the only way to secure the peace. I am not sure war is the only way though, and maintain that politicians owe thousand of American soldiers diplomacy, because thousands of American soldiers WILL die in the event of a ground war in Iraq. They are a tougher nut to crack, geographically, demographically, and militarily.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38118
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#5 Postby Brent » Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:32 pm

I think it's doubtful anytime soon unless Iran attacks an ally in the region or seems to be on the brink of attacking. The military just cannot handle it right now.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
BEER980
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1727
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Ocala, Fl
Contact:

#6 Postby BEER980 » Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:59 am

Brent don't be surprised if you see a false flag attack. This Wednesday would be a prime day for an attack. Lets hope it is an uneventful day. I have taken the day off from work and will be yak fishing for my birthday. I hit the water at 6am so if something happens I won't know it for awhile.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#7 Postby rainstorm » Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:51 am

BEER980 wrote:Brent don't be surprised if you see a false flag attack. This Wednesday would be a prime day for an attack. Lets hope it is an uneventful day. I have taken the day off from work and will be yak fishing for my birthday. I hit the water at 6am so if something happens I won't know it for awhile.



lets hope and pray there is an attack and soon. and iran is attacking one of our allies, US!! they support the terrorists that kill our troops, and we let them kill our troops so far with a kill for free card.

so soon some people forget history. the israelis saved the world from millions of deaths in 1983 when they told saddam he wasnt going to produce nukes. iran hates our guts. iran supports the butchering of our troops. iran says they will produce nukes. iran is a terror state. if iran gets nukes, terrorists get nukes.
what are we waiting for? a mushroom cloud to blossom?
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests