$1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

$1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#1 Postby Dionne » Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:21 pm

Everyone in your family gets $1654....providing they are full time residents in Alaska.

It is the oil royalty money Alaskans enjoy. We used to get the dividend check when we lived at mile 92 Parks near Talkeetna. Always a nice shot in the arm this time of year as the sun begins its descent.

Why don't Texas or Louisiana residents get royalties?

All comments welcomed.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#2 Postby gtalum » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:33 pm

Dionne wrote:Everyone in your family gets $1654....providing they are full time residents in Alaska.

It is the oil royalty money Alaskans enjoy. We used to get the dividend check when we lived at mile 92 Parks near Talkeetna. Always a nice shot in the arm this time of year as the sun begins its descent.

Why don't Texas or Louisiana residents get royalties?

All comments welcomed.


I don't think the royalty is big enough to account for the higher cost of living in Alaska. They established the Permanent Fund and they pay the royalty to get people to move there. They need people very badly. LA and TX have no such problem.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#3 Postby Coredesat » Thu Sep 20, 2007 5:58 pm

Indeed, the cost of living in Alaska is ridiculously high, plus the residents have the oil companies to deal with. $1654 isn't much for them.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#4 Postby Dionne » Sat Sep 22, 2007 9:49 am

The higher cost of living in Alaska is misleading. If you reside in Anchorage (half the population of the state does).....then yes.....you are going to experience a higher cost of living.....as well as a much higher income. The other half of the state is mostly rural......bush living. Subsistence hunting and fishing. Some areas have prolific gardens. Mortgages are unheard off. No electric bill. No water bill. Very low taxes.

Say you've got 3 kids, husband and wife.....$1654 X 5 = $8270.

There is no question that we could have wintered out just fine with that kind of a stash cash.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#5 Postby Coredesat » Sat Sep 22, 2007 12:08 pm

Actually, utility bills there are quite high. It takes a great deal to get electricity to remote areas. Add that to the fact that gas up there costs over $2 more than the national average and that much, much driving is needed to get anywhere, and you have a problem. Although I do question giving kids the $1654.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#6 Postby MGC » Sat Sep 22, 2007 11:40 pm

My sister lives in a little town across the inlet from Anchorage called Knik. I spent 10 days there last summer and loved it. Yes, the cost of living is a bit more than what I am use to in Mississippi, but I didn't think it was excessive. Once I retire I plan on spending the entire summer up there to get away from the Mississippi heat. I could never be a full time resident due to the harsh winter cold. Alaska is one of the most beautiful places I have ever been.....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re:

#7 Postby Dionne » Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:12 am

Coredesat wrote:Actually, utility bills there are quite high. It takes a great deal to get electricity to remote areas. Add that to the fact that gas up there costs over $2 more than the national average and that much, much driving is needed to get anywhere, and you have a problem. Although I do question giving kids the $1654.



Wow.....I cannot believe you posted that! Why would a child not be considered a resident? The Permanent Fund is for all residents of the state of Alaska. :cold:
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#8 Postby gtalum » Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:51 am

Dionne wrote:The higher cost of living in Alaska is misleading. If you reside in Anchorage (half the population of the state does).....then yes.....you are going to experience a higher cost of living.....as well as a much higher income. The other half of the state is mostly rural......bush living. Subsistence hunting and fishing. Some areas have prolific gardens. Mortgages are unheard off. No electric bill. No water bill. Very low taxes.

Say you've got 3 kids, husband and wife.....$1654 X 5 = $8270.

There is no question that we could have wintered out just fine with that kind of a stash cash.


No offense, but you'd have to pay me a lot more than $8270 annually to move to rural Alaska. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#9 Postby Dionne » Mon Sep 24, 2007 6:11 am

No offense, but you'd have to pay me a lot more than $8270 annually to move to rural Alaska. :lol:[/quote]

Good point. The primary reason we left (and later sold) our homestead was the isolation. Raising an only child without the interaction of other children was something we had not anticipated. Home schooling is okay.....but kids need other kids to play with.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

Re: $1654 Alaska Permanent Fund dividend

#10 Postby gtalum » Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:45 am

Dionne wrote:
Good point. The primary reason we left (and later sold) our homestead was the isolation. Raising an only child without the interaction of other children was something we had not anticipated. Home schooling is okay.....but kids need other kids to play with.


That's along the lines I was thinking. I enjoy Alaska, as it's beautiful. I couldn't live there and be happy though, even in the "big city" of Anchorage. I liek warmth and sunlight too much. I'd go insane during the winter.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests