recmod wrote:At the risk of looking totally ignorant.....I will ask this question.
If the BAMM model is so bad at forecasting tropical systems.......WHY is it used??????????????
--Lou
The BAM models are initialized off the AVN model. This is why they're useful: They factor in something that none of the others do--called the "beta effect", which says that because a storm is in the northern hemisphere, if the steering currents are weak, it will drift northward because of the coriolis effect. There are three of them BAMS, BAMM, and BAMD for shallow, medium, and deep. If a storm is weak, it is pushed more by shallow winds, if it is really strong by upper-level winds. BAMD, therefore, was good with Katrina, because the steering was weak, and it was a very strong storm so the deep winds were guiding it towards New Orleans. In this case, I expect Rita will be very powerful, so following where the BAMD puts it will be more valuable in the days ahead, but because steering currents are NOT weak, it would be better just to look at the global dynamic models--especially AVN, NOGAPS, and GFDL. I especially focus on the GFDL--it is designed exclusively for predicting hurricanes well, while the others are designed for global weather forecasts.
-vaffie