Tropical Storm Ophelia

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1601 Postby Thunder44 » Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:59 am

Derek Ortt wrote:the bouys have sampled enough of the storm to clearly indicate that this is most likely not a 70KT storm.

the pressure has zero bearing on whether or not its a hurricane or a TS, 10 meter wind speed is the sole determining factor


The pressure suggests the winds are stronger. You don't use just one piece of data, you can use several pieces of data to determine the intensity of a hurricane.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1602 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:03 am

and pressure is NOT one of them

it is the pressure gradient. Any dynamics course will teach one that. Pressure ifself is not a force and simple physics states that a force is needed to cause an acceleration
0 likes   

n.c sunshine
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:43 pm

#1603 Postby n.c sunshine » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:12 am

Local T.V just reported 96 mph wind gust at a bouy off of Wilmington N.C
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

#1604 Postby UpTheCreek » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:13 am

Whether or not this is a hurricane seems to be splitting hairs, but splitting hairs is what this forum is all about in my opinion. FWIW, we are to be hit square with this thing and for now it feels like it's a tropical storm. And yes, this tropical storm could very well do more damage to us than Isabel did only for it's speed of movement.

I think it's important for the pros here to get the official categorization of this storm right if only for history's sake. Who really wants it officially going down in the books as a hurricane when it's really not?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1605 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:16 am

that gust shows what is going on

the winds seem to have problems making it through the boundary layer, as Frying Pan Shoals is about 100 feet above the water
0 likes   

n.c sunshine
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:43 pm

#1606 Postby n.c sunshine » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:22 am

Derek ? Does that mean that the 96mph wind gust would not make it down to the surface.
0 likes   

dekeoy
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: Wilmington/Wrightsville Beach, NC
Contact:

#1607 Postby dekeoy » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:23 am

Frying Pan Tower is not reporting winds. That facility has been not been maintained in a number of years and is scheduled for demolition. The new bouy is at water level, and can be seen here.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=41013

And if the information shown is correct, as of 8:50 am, it seems that the buoy is now in the eye.
Last edited by dekeoy on Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

no advance
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 413
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:50 pm
Location: merritt is.

#1608 Postby no advance » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:24 am

In my opinion every storm has its own little characteristics. You can analize it senseless. I know one thing about this storm it will be a very wet and windy day in east North Carol.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#1609 Postby x-y-no » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:26 am

Derek Ortt wrote:that gust shows what is going on

the winds seem to have problems making it through the boundary layer, as Frying Pan Shoals is about 100 feet above the water


Anemometer height for Station 41013 - Frying Pan Shoals, NC Buoy is 5 meters.
0 likes   

User avatar
Okibeach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Oak Island NC

#1610 Postby Okibeach » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:31 am

Just got the generator up and running. I dont have an anemometer but have been through enough storms and can say that we aremost likely experiencing hurricane force winds. Oak Island is probably as close as you can get to the western edge of the eyewall right now via radr obs. Huge tree that is now covering my back yard can also attest to it. :grr:
0 likes   

Jim Hughes
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: Martinsburg West Virginia

#1611 Postby Jim Hughes » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:32 am

wxman57 wrote:
Skyline wrote:And let me add:

"Data from an Air Force Reserve reconnaissance and NOAA land-based
Doppler radars indicate maximum sustained winds have increased to
near 80 mph with higher gusts. Ophelia is a category one hurricane
on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Some slight strengthening is still
possible during the next 24 hours before landfall occurs."

From 8am advisory. So much for blackberry.


Land-based Doppler radars CANNOT measure surface winds except for within 5-10 miles of the radar. The Earths' curvature means that those radar beams are passing about 5000-10,000 feet above the surface at Ophelia's location. So that Doppler radar is measuring flight level winds, not surface winds.

Now, keep in mind that I'm not broadcasting my opinions over the airwaves to the general public. This is simply an online discussion group. I would not have told everyone to stay on the beaches, this is nothing to worry about. I'm simply stating facts about actual observations as the storm passes various reporting points. And those facts do not support Ophelia being classified as a hurricane.

Show me an actual surface MEASUREMENT of wind speeds 65 kts or greater, please.

Have to go back to work now.


My question to you would be doesn't this probably happen more often than the average Joe thinks? Storms are given higher actual winds....Some storms have more recon data ....land base related...bouy data ...etc... Or am I wrong here.


Jim
0 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

#1612 Postby sponger » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:34 am

Wow so much dabate over ts vs hurricane. If Wxman and Ortt say it is below that is good enough for me. I agree the NHC will play it safe (as they should) Not a whole lot of difference to those on the ground as many gusts will exceede h force anyway.
Last edited by sponger on Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

#1613 Postby UpTheCreek » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:38 am

sponger wrote:Wow so much dabate over ts vs hurricane. If Wxman and Ortt say it is below that good enough for me. I agree the NHC will play it safe (as they should) Not a whole lot of difference to those on the ground and many gusts will exceede h force anyway.


Couldn't agree more!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Okibeach
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Oak Island NC

#1614 Postby Okibeach » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:40 am

sponger wrote:Wow so much dabate over ts vs hurricane. If Wxman and Ortt say it is below that good enough for me. I agree the NHC will play it safe (as they should) Not a whole lot of difference to those on the ground and many gusts will exceede h force anyway.



Have to agree with sponger about not making a whole lot of difference to those experiencing it, strong ts or low end cat1, but understand the pro mets work with numbers. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Will Ophelia make an official landfall?

#1615 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:41 am

Im My eyes when that Eywall comes ashore its landfall but officiallt its not untill the center Center of Circ comes ashore...Does anyone think this will make it...?
0 likes   

Jim Hughes
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: Martinsburg West Virginia

#1616 Postby Jim Hughes » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:46 am

Thunder44 wrote:While I respect the pros opinions here, I believe it's enough this is a hurricane by looking at the current pressure of the storm, satellite and radar images. I don't dispute the obs, but one or two buoy doesn't cover the entire storm, nor can you really measure every square inch of the storm. One thing I've learned about hurricanes is that everywhere around the eye are the maxium sustained that TPC reports. It's only the maximun as well not the minimum. And it's really moot to be splitting hairs with this storm when it's about the make landfall.


Well the NHC is the Official Opinion and it says that Ophelia has increased her wind speed by 10 mph since 3pm yesterday so my outlook calling for a 10 mph intensification before the 5pm discussion today/landfall.... DID OCCUR.

I use historical data that they provide for making my space weather based intensity forecast. So until they say it's less than 80 mph , it is not.

I am intersted in what wxman57 is saying because similar conditios were present around Bonnie's time also. So this was not me pointing out an example. This particular storm was brought up by someone else.

I will try and post something later with data ...comments ...etc.


Jim
0 likes   

Jim Hughes
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: Martinsburg West Virginia

#1617 Postby Jim Hughes » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:54 am

sponger wrote:Wow so much dabate over ts vs hurricane. If Wxman and Ortt say it is below that is good enough for me. I agree the NHC will play it safe (as they should) Not a whole lot of difference to those on the ground as many gusts will exceede h force anyway.


Well I have a history in the Washington DC area of stirring up debates within the meteorolgical community when it comes to events that I have forecasted. How bad etc....

Some people have said that I am just being paranoid...you are seeing it first hand here. I have only been here about 8 weeks but I have yet to see this kind of public criticism against the NHC by the experts. Why this storm?

Some people questioned Katrina's high winds but the debate never reached this level nor it's openess.

You be the judge. BTW wxman57 excluded ....he was pointing this out a couple of days ago....to closed ears.


Jim
0 likes   

User avatar
UpTheCreek
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 397
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:28 pm
Location: Vassalboro, Maine

#1618 Postby UpTheCreek » Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:01 am

I am a complete layman when it comes to all weather, but being just a casual (and perhaps more objective) observer to all this debate, could it be that it can mostly be blamed on this slow moving and sometimes erratic behavior of this particular storm? Maybe the longer this thing hangs around, it's beginning to be "the thing that wouldn't leave", kind of like a mother-in-law!!!

Interesting debate nonetheless!
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#1619 Postby skysummit » Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:23 am

Here's a GRLevel3 capture showing a weather station getting 77mph sustained winds gusting to 102mph.

Image
Last edited by skysummit on Wed Sep 14, 2005 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#1620 Postby jasons2k » Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:27 am

no advance wrote:In my opinion every storm has its own little characteristics. You can analize it senseless. I know one thing about this storm it will be a very wet and windy day in east North Carol.


Excellent point - just like a snowflake, they are all Unique, just like Katrina's strongest quad. was the SE (not NE) side.
0 likes   


Return to “2005”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest