WPAC: Typhoon Saomai (0608)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#101 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:05 pm

Actually, IMO, Saomai really never did look like a 5, although IMO it's probably still a STY (it's an upper end 4).
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#102 Postby Cyclenall » Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:10 pm

When I first checked this storm this morning, I thought this looked almost exactly like Hurricane Katrina. I would agree with the storm's strength at 140 Knots and 898 mb. This is the 3rd best looking tropical cyclone of 2006 IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#103 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:55 pm

It looks as good as Rita maybe not as clear of a eye but rita was also 150 knots. I don't understand why people try to lower everything even so its most likely is. It matchs. Wish there was recon to confirm.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#104 Postby HurricaneGirl » Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:55 pm

:eek: Holy Crap!!! :eek: That thing is kickin!
0 likes   

User avatar
marcane_1973
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 330
Age: 50
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 pm
Location: N.C.
Contact:

#105 Postby marcane_1973 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:21 pm

Here is a beautiful visible of this Typhoon. This will most likely be the best looking storm of 2006. The Atlantic will be lucky to see a Cat 4 this season. It looks VERY SIMILAR to Katrina in this photo :eek: http://www.npmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/image ... /goesa.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6628
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

#106 Postby Cyclenall » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:27 pm

marcane_1973 wrote:Here is a beautiful visible of this Typhoon. This will most likely be the best looking storm of 2006. The Atlantic will be lucky to see a Cat 4 this season. It looks VERY SIMILAR to Katrina in this photo :eek: http://www.npmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/image ... /goesa.jpg

The Atlantic will be lucky to see a category 4 this season? Umm no, the Atlantic has a very high chance at having a CAT4 this season. That link you posted shows nothing but a box with the X in it. This most likely won't be the best looking storm of the year 2006 since Cyclone Monica already beat out this storm and Hurricane Daniel.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#107 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:29 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/mtsat/flt/t2/avn-l.jpg

Perfect red cloud tops around the eye...With round Cdo. Eye very well developed. My winds are set at 145 knots.

150 for the Atlantic-5 knots for the lower pressure for the western pacific.
0 likes   

User avatar
marcane_1973
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 330
Age: 50
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 pm
Location: N.C.
Contact:

#108 Postby marcane_1973 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:39 pm

Cyclenall wrote:
marcane_1973 wrote:Here is a beautiful visible of this Typhoon. This will most likely be the best looking storm of 2006. The Atlantic will be lucky to see a Cat 4 this season. It looks VERY SIMILAR to Katrina in this photo :eek: http://www.npmoc.navy.mil/cgi-bin/image ... /goesa.jpg

The Atlantic will be lucky to see a category 4 this season? Umm no, the Atlantic has a very high chance at having a CAT4 this season. That link you posted shows nothing but a box with the X in it. This most likely won't be the best looking storm of the year 2006 since Cyclone Monica already beat out this storm and Hurricane Daniel.
Works fine on my PC.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#109 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:13 pm

Does anybody have WPAC zoomed out satellite (as in one like marcane posted or this one: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... mages.html), from a few days ago up to today? Thanks...
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 59
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#110 Postby HurricaneGirl » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:14 pm

:eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#111 Postby P.K. » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:22 pm

Cyclenall wrote:
marcane_1973 wrote:This most likely won't be the best looking storm of the year 2006 since Cyclone Monica already beat out this storm and Hurricane Daniel.


Severe Tropical Cyclone Monica did look better on satellite from what I've seen, of course that means it was worse at landfall.

Down to 90kts now.

RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY
NAME TY 0608 SAOMAI (0608)
ANALYSIS
PSTN 092100UTC 26.3N 123.0E GOOD
MOVE WNW 13KT
PRES 930HPA
MXWD 090KT
50KT 70NM EAST 60NM WEST
30KT 140NM EAST 90NM WEST
FORECAST
24HF 102100UTC 28.3N 117.7E 80NM 70%
MOVE WNW 12KT
PRES 985HPA
MXWD 045KT
45HF 111800UTC 30.6N 112.8E 150NM 70% TROPICAL DEPRESSION
0 likes   

User avatar
Epsilon_Fan
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Charleston, SC

#112 Postby Epsilon_Fan » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:39 pm

I guess annularity (if thats a word) is a prerequisite to a beautiful hurricane. I agree however that Monica and Daniel are the best so far this year with this one a close third
0 likes   

miamicanes177
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1131
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:53 pm

#113 Postby miamicanes177 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:43 pm

sorry, but this is not a 90kt cat 2 storm. that is just dumb.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 33
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#114 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:56 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:sorry, but this is not a 90kt cat 2 storm. that is just dumb.


That is 10-min average, not 1-min.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 41
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#115 Postby senorpepr » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:00 pm

miamicanes177 wrote:sorry, but this is not a 90kt cat 2 storm. that is just dumb.


A reminder for everyone...

12. Storm2K.org does not allow personal attacks and/or personal insults of any kind directed to The National Hurricane Center, it’s staff or any other professional weather organization for that matter. While one may disagree it is very important we keep respecting the weather professionals and their opinions. We are expecting all members to act professionally at all times.

(This includes the JMA)

Furthermore, the JMA reports winds by the official WMO standard: 10-minute average. The US reports winds by their own standard: 1-minute average.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

#116 Postby Dave C » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:15 pm

The navy site has the first visable and it's a deadly beauty.
http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
If you zoom the pic. it's awesome with sun reflection on inside west part of the eye.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#117 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:21 pm

4:20pm pst update


The latest shows a well defined Typhoon(Katrina/rita like)deep convection of 80 minus is around the eye. With great outflow all quads but northwest. Dry air could be starting to affect it. The cloud tops over the northwest quad have warmed about 10c over the last few hours. Asmre 85h data last scan shown what could be a second eyewall over the western part. System based on this is downed from 145-150 knots Atlatnic mix with 140-145 western Pacific. New thinking is 140 Atlatnic with 135 western Pacific.

Newest 135 knots...

System should be inland with in 12 hours...

6 hours 130 knots
12 hours 120 knots inland
24 100 knots inland


These numbers are one minute winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11649
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Portland,OR
Contact:

#118 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:24 pm

Monica should of looked better on the satellite why because she was strong..150-155 knots. Some data said should could of been over 170 knots. Which would be amazing.
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#119 Postby whereverwx » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:35 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:Does anybody have WPAC zoomed out satellite (as in one like marcane posted or this one: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... mages.html), from a few days ago up to today? Thanks...

This is as far back as I could go...

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Also, I have this:

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Last edited by whereverwx on Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#120 Postby P.K. » Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:39 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:Does anybody have WPAC zoomed out satellite (as in one like marcane posted or this one: http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... mages.html), from a few days ago up to today? Thanks...


This one goes back 24 hours. http://www.jma.go.jp/en/gms/index.html?area=1&element=0&mode=UTC
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests