NRA Sues Mayor Ray Nagin

Discuss the recovery and aftermath of landfalling hurricanes. Please be sensitive to those that have been directly impacted. Political threads will be deleted without notice. This is the place to come together not divide.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

NRA Sues Mayor Ray Nagin

#1 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:14 pm

Fairfax, VA-The National Rifle Association (NRA ) has filed a motion for contempt against the City of New Orleans, the mayor and the acting chief of police for failure to comply with a temporary restraining order, handed down September 12, 2005, ordering an end to all illegal gun confiscations.
"With looters, rapists and other thugs running rampant in New Orleans, Ray Nagin issued an order to disarm all law-abiding citizens," declared Wayne LaPierre, NRA executive vice president. "With no law enforcement and 911 available, he left the victims vulnerable by stripping away their only means of defending themselves and their loved ones. Now Ray Nagin thinks he's above the law, and that's just wrong."
Attorneys for NRA have exhausted all efforts to cooperate with the defendants, Mayor Nagin and Chief Riley, who repeatedly ignored the court's permanent restraining order against their illegal gun confiscations.
"Ray Nagin is a colossal disappointment," said Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist. "During a federally declared emergency, he abused his power and abandoned the very people he was sworn to protect. He took away the victims' freedom and their basic means of self-defense during an ill-fated and perilous time."
The motion also includes an order that all seized firearms must be returned to their rightful owners.
-nra-
Sorry if this ends up being political, will try to stay away from that, its about time someone did something about that mayor...:lol: I thought you guys would enjoy the article. We were listening to the news the other day and it sounds like, according to the press, that only New Orleans got hit by Katrina and that was it...it developed over the city and died over the city...oh...how is Waveland and Gulf Port (and everywhere else) coming along? I havent heard any news from there since Mark Sudduth's last visit... (by the way, the NRA is the National Rifle Association, and we get their monthy newsletters and emails from them, their newsletters include articles on PETA, hunting, the right to bear arms infringements that they are tackling...etc)
Last edited by brunota2003 on Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#2 Postby TSmith274 » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:20 pm

Let me preface this by saying that I am a member of the NRA. But, this suit is ridiculous. Let's not act like we don't know who the city was trying to disarm. It was the criminals and gang members. It needed to be done. And now, the NRA wants the guns returned to their owners. Great... lets give the criminals their guns back. Great idea, NRA. Let's start using a little common sense, please.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#3 Postby Pearl River » Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:03 pm

Yeah, they are also sueing St Tammany Parish too. My brother-in-law works for the sheriff's department. He said those fine upstanding citizens from New Orleans would either walk over to Slidell on the five mile bridge or swim across Lake Pontchartrain, and as soon as they got here, the deputies would take the weapons from them and let them on their way. The NRA is going to step into something they shouldn't.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#4 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:10 pm

Agree, I am an NRA supporter; but this sounds kind of crazy.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#5 Postby ROCK » Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:55 pm

All Im going to say is "right to bear arms."
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#6 Postby Ixolib » Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:08 pm

its about time someone did something about that mayor...


Interesting statement... :uarrow:

Thankfully, HE did something about the criminals when he needed to. Something more mayors ought to do.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#7 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:14 pm

Ixolib wrote:
its about time someone did something about that mayor...


Interesting statement... :uarrow:

Thankfully, HE did something about the criminals when he needed to. Something more mayors ought to do.
He didnt evacuate people when he needed to though...and there wouldnt of been enough criminals to cause him to break a constitutional RIGHT to get the situation covered...if I was defending my house, and they walked up to me and took away my only weapons of protection...I would be so mad...he just left the people there...
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#8 Postby Ixolib » Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:52 pm

brunota2003 wrote:
Ixolib wrote:
its about time someone did something about that mayor...


Interesting statement... :uarrow:

Thankfully, HE did something about the criminals when he needed to. Something more mayors ought to do.


He didnt evacuate people when he needed to though...and there wouldnt of been enough criminals to cause him to break a constitutional RIGHT to get the situation covered...if I was defending my house, and they walked up to me and took away my only weapons of protection...I would be so mad...he just left the people there...


Well, we could probably debate that issue :uarrow: for years - and probably will. But I believe that no mayor of New Orleans - be it Nagin or anyone else - would have had much of a different result. In my viewpoint of the whole Katrina situation in N.O. and elsewhere is that the "officials" - all of 'em - were simply overwhelmed by the extreme catastrophe brought on by the storm. Obviously, no one had any previous experience in dealing with extremes of this nature, including evacuation.

As for taking away your gun, I'm not sure they were going house to house taking guns from law-abiding citizens. Although I'm not well versed on the particulars of this story, it is my understanding that the guns were taken from those who were deemed as dangerous to the community, i.e., the criminals, thugs, and gangs. If you have a link to the credible news coverage on this, I'd like to have a look.
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#9 Postby TSmith274 » Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:03 am

Ixolib wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:
Ixolib wrote:
its about time someone did something about that mayor...


Interesting statement... :uarrow:

Thankfully, HE did something about the criminals when he needed to. Something more mayors ought to do.


He didnt evacuate people when he needed to though...and there wouldnt of been enough criminals to cause him to break a constitutional RIGHT to get the situation covered...if I was defending my house, and they walked up to me and took away my only weapons of protection...I would be so mad...he just left the people there...


Well, we could probably debate that issue :uarrow: for years - and probably will. But I believe that no mayor of New Orleans - be it Nagin or anyone else - would have had much of a different result. In my viewpoint of the whole Katrina situation in N.O. and elsewhere is that the "officials" - all of 'em - were simply overwhelmed by the extreme catastrophe brought on by the storm. Obviously, no one had any previous experience in dealing with extremes of this nature, including evacuation.

As for taking away your gun, I'm not sure they were going house to house taking guns from law-abiding citizens. Although I'm not well versed on the particulars of this story, it is my understanding that the guns were taken from those who were deemed as dangerous to the community, i.e., the criminals, thugs, and gangs. If you have a link to the credible news coverage on this, I'd like to have a look.


Ixolib, excellent points. I agree. And, no, guns were not taken from law abiding citizens. Believe me... in south Louisiana, had that happened... there would be hell to pay. These guns were taken from criminals. That's just the truth.
0 likes   

HoumaLa
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 7:09 am
Location: Houma Louisiana

#10 Postby HoumaLa » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:03 am

All I know is after Katrina we slept with 2 guns by our beds loaded and ready. With a neice and a sister in law working for the law in forcement couldn't take a chance.
I wouldn't want anyone coming to take them away.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#11 Postby Lindaloo » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:08 am

brunota2003 wrote:
Ixolib wrote:
its about time someone did something about that mayor...


Interesting statement... :uarrow:

Thankfully, HE did something about the criminals when he needed to. Something more mayors ought to do.
He didnt evacuate people when he needed to though...and there wouldnt of been enough criminals to cause him to break a constitutional RIGHT to get the situation covered...if I was defending my house, and they walked up to me and took away my only weapons of protection...I would be so mad...he just left the people there...


You saved me the trouble of typing. Well said!
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#12 Postby Pearl River » Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:04 pm

ROCK wrote

All Im going to say is "right to bear arms."


There is a difference between "right to bear arms" and convicted felons possessing "arms". It's called "Illegal".
0 likes   

User avatar
stormcrow
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 151
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 10:33 pm
Location: Calgary Alberta

#13 Postby stormcrow » Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:47 pm

it the NRA what more can you say.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#14 Postby ROCK » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:47 pm

Pearl River wrote:ROCK wrote

All Im going to say is "right to bear arms."


There is a difference between "right to bear arms" and convicted felons possessing "arms". It's called "Illegal".



I didn't know that....thanks for clearing that up.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#15 Postby Pearl River » Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:15 pm

ROCK wrote

Pearl River wrote:
ROCK wrote

Quote:
All Im going to say is "right to bear arms."


There is a difference between "right to bear arms" and convicted felons possessing "arms". It's called "Illegal".



I didn't know that....thanks for clearing that up.


Not a problem. Have a good one. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#16 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:04 am

Right to bear arms... except for the convicted felons. I'm sorry i'm not givin up my firearms in time of need for the to protect my family. I'm not a convicted felon.

I just think that hurricane prep. is going to be different from now on or at least i hope it will.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#17 Postby Lindaloo » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:13 am

After 9/11 people were buying firearms. The hurricane part makes no difference.

Nagin has enough problems and worries, like getting re-elected.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#18 Postby southerngale » Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:44 pm

Ixolib wrote: But I believe that no mayor of New Orleans - be it Nagin or anyone else - would have had much of a different result. In my viewpoint of the whole Katrina situation in N.O. and elsewhere is that the "officials" - all of 'em - were simply overwhelmed by the extreme catastrophe brought on by the storm. Obviously, no one had any previous experience in dealing with extremes of this nature, including evacuation.

I'm not so sure about another mayor not having much of a different result. Of course there's no way to ever know, but when you have the President of the United States and the director of the National Hurricane Center calling you and begging you to call for an evacuation, and you still wait until Sunday, that's pretty bad. I won't even get into the school buses just sitting there in flood waters after the storm, etc. There should have never been that many people in New Orleans.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#19 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:48 pm

. There should have never been that many people in New Orleans.


Absolutely agree. Not with what that thing was just 24 hours before landfall. I know hindsight is 20-20; but foresight is what saves lives, and I feel the lack thereof has done just that in this case.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#20 Postby Ixolib » Sat Mar 04, 2006 6:31 pm

southerngale wrote:
Ixolib wrote: But I believe that no mayor of New Orleans - be it Nagin or anyone else - would have had much of a different result. In my viewpoint of the whole Katrina situation in N.O. and elsewhere is that the "officials" - all of 'em - were simply overwhelmed by the extreme catastrophe brought on by the storm. Obviously, no one had any previous experience in dealing with extremes of this nature, including evacuation.

I'm not so sure about another mayor not having much of a different result. Of course there's no way to ever know, but when you have the President of the United States and the director of the National Hurricane Center calling you and begging you to call for an evacuation, and you still wait until Sunday, that's pretty bad. I won't even get into the school buses just sitting there in flood waters after the storm, etc. There should have never been that many people in New Orleans.


Wishing I were more schooled in the circumstances of that Saturday & Sunday in N.O., what WERE the reasons for the evacuation being delayed? I mean, Nagin must have been reacting in the way he did for some reason... :?: :?:
0 likes   


Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests