Margie wrote:
Of course one can only hope that he eventually will be held liable for stranding, and then blockading them there without water, food, medical assistance, security, information, access to communication, protection from the extremely high heat and humidity, even clean toilet facilities. Basically, that was his plan.
So tell me, does this mean it was "his plan"--to strand people, then blockade them, without food and water" ?
Personally I find it inconceivable that Nagin was sitting around in his mayoral office that Saturday and pondering a scheme to "strand" countless thousands who just didn't
have the good sense to leave when they already KNEW a major storm was on the way.
This smacks of the kind of mentality that would accuse the military of having blown up the levees just so they could flood out the black neighborhoods. (Of course nevermind that some of the most affluent areas of the city which were predominantly white in a 70% majority black city, suffered some of the worst flooding)
What about "
Personal RESPONSIBILITY". Those people were told as both I and PR have cited, to bring sleeping bags, supplies, food and water for "several days" that the dome could NOT accomodate all their needs and FOREWARNED that
it would NOT be very comfortable there. The fact remains that untold THOUSANDS CHOSE to stay and no one is responsible for THEIR inaction/choices but
they themselves.
Everyone I've seen/heard seems to acknowledge that a MUCH better plan should have been in place to meet the needs of the infirm, the elderly, and otherwise incapacitated to make provision for evacuation--but all this finger pointing at Nagin as guilty of everything but the assassination of Lincoln is a bit of a stretch. The man made
a lot of mistakes; but one of them WAS NOT a deliberate "plan" to get people stranded, then keep them trapped through some sort of perceived "blockade" and then relish in watching their anguish through starvation and water deprivation.
A2K