Interesting what they say as always they do with these forecasts.
P.K this forecast deserved a new thread apart from the Colorado State University thread.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Gtmalacd wrote:Why a new thread. I think we have enough with the other thread by Drezee..
i wish everyone could read this!!!its gonna give people a since of not to be worried when in fact this maybe a very bad season without 27 storms IT ONLY TAKES ONE!Scorpion wrote:I don't understand why people bother saying "alot less active" than 2005. Of course it will be. With 27 named storms, 2005 is a pure anomoly, and most of those storms were weak TS's that otherwise wouldnt have formed if not for the warm SST's. This makes the public believe "oh its not gonna be bad". Well 2004 had 15 named storms, and it was a BAD season.
Users browsing this forum: TomballEd and 80 guests