Should the NHC take over the South Atlantic?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

Should the NHC take over the South Atlantic?

YES
15
52%
NO - LEAVE IT TO BRAZIL
4
14%
NO - LEAVE IT TO THE WMO TO DECIDE
10
34%
 
Total votes: 29

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Should the NHC take over the South Atlantic?

#1 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:05 pm

Three tropical cyclones in three years is something unheard for the South Atlantic Ocean. But it has happened. Two tropical cyclones in 2004, and one in 2006 (so far!). The meteorological community should start paying more attention to what once was though to be an infertile place for tropical cyclones. Everyone knows that that is partially true, the South Atlantic is most of the time very unfavorable for tropical cyclones to form. Furthermore, two continents block any passage from any other South Hemisphere's cyclones. I think it's time for an organization to take responsibility over this basin and in my opinion, like it has been already discussed, the NHC is the best option. They have already trained professionals and in the case a tropical cyclone forms in the winter in the South Atlantic Ocean, it will only take a little overtime!

Your opinion is always welcomed.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#2 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:44 pm

It's a part of the Atlantic, so i'd say yes.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#3 Postby P.K. » Sat Feb 25, 2006 1:44 pm

I'd just leave it to Argentina, Brazil, or South Africa depending on which region it was to form in. I'm not sure I see the need for a RSMC or TCWC down there yet though.
0 likes   

User avatar
TheEuropean
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1797
Age: 60
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:17 pm
Location: Voerde, Germany
Contact:

#4 Postby TheEuropean » Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:22 pm

P.K. wrote:I'd just leave it to Argentina, Brazil, or South Africa depending on which region it was to form in. I'm not sure I see the need for a RSMC or TCWC down there yet though.


But in 2004 the brazilian weather service didn't see a tropical cyclone, they spoked about an extratropical system. So I think the trained NHC ist the right institution for watching the southern atlantic.
0 likes   

Coredesat

#5 Postby Coredesat » Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:43 pm

The whole Catarina fiasco was why I voted that the NHC should monitor the South Atlantic, or at the very least work with South American governments to form some kind of joint tropical cyclone task force.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#6 Postby P.K. » Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:12 pm

TheEuropean wrote:But in 2004 the brazilian weather service didn't see a tropical cyclone, they spoked about an extratropical system. So I think the trained NHC ist the right institution for watching the southern atlantic.


Well there may always be small differences in opinon when looking at different forecasters.:wink:

The fact this was noticed just indicates they are now looking at more closely at these systems. Still if a RSMC was set up down here it would have to be either Brazil or South Africa I guess as the USA doesn't cover this area of the ocean at all. http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/tempusfugit/marine/metarea.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#7 Postby WindRunner » Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:28 pm

I say yes, as it would be the most cost-efficient and effective solution. If the NHC takes over, then all that is needed is a little more work on the NHC staff's part. Another RSMC would require too much monetary and time investment (for now - if these storms become more frequent, then it's a different story). Of course, the WMO will have the final decision on the subject, and that's what matters.
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#8 Postby P.K. » Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:40 pm

My point is the USA forecasts for its part of the North Atlantic all year, and this is the part that the NHC also covers. This area is already covered by Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa so I don't see why the NHC should have to do it. I'm sure they are fully capable covering these systems especially given how often they occur.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#9 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:44 pm

P.K. wrote:My point is the USA forecasts for its part of the North Atlantic all year, and this is the part that the NHC also covers. This area is already covered by Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa so I don't see why the NHC should have to do it. I'm sure they are fully capable covering these systems especially given how often they occur.
Exactly. This is already the aforementioned countries' area of responsibility. They forecast for these waters daily. Why not let one of the nations take up a TCWC/RSMC position?
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#10 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:52 pm

senorpepr wrote:
P.K. wrote:My point is the USA forecasts for its part of the North Atlantic all year, and this is the part that the NHC also covers. This area is already covered by Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa so I don't see why the NHC should have to do it. I'm sure they are fully capable covering these systems especially given how often they occur.
Exactly. This is already the aforementioned countries' area of responsibility. They forecast for these waters daily. Why not let one of the nations take up a TCWC/RSMC position?


more expense
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#11 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:53 pm

Perhaps a new organization should be in place for the South Atlantic area... any thoughts?
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#12 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:05 pm

fact789 wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
P.K. wrote:My point is the USA forecasts for its part of the North Atlantic all year, and this is the part that the NHC also covers. This area is already covered by Argentina, Brazil, and South Africa so I don't see why the NHC should have to do it. I'm sure they are fully capable covering these systems especially given how often they occur.
Exactly. This is already the aforementioned countries' area of responsibility. They forecast for these waters daily. Why not let one of the nations take up a TCWC/RSMC position?


more expense
There wouldn't be more expense if, say, the Brazilian Met Office accomplished the task much like the Honolulu WSFO doubles as the CPHC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2041
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#13 Postby Hurricanehink » Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:14 pm

Look at the Central Pacific Hurricane Center. The Central Pacific is only a bit more active than the South Atlantic, and if you exclude EPAC crossovers, there can be years at a time without a TC.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#14 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:20 pm

After Caterina, are we sure that the Brazilians should have any say? I'd take JTWC before I took the Brazilians (I wonder if they issue any warnings for threats to US Navy ships in the region?)
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#15 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:56 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:After Caterina, are we sure that the Brazilians should have any say? I'd take JTWC before I took the Brazilians (I wonder if they issue any warnings for threats to US Navy ships in the region?)
If the JTWC didn't, the ship's meteorologists would/should.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#16 Postby senorpepr » Sat Feb 25, 2006 7:58 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:After Caterina, are we sure that the Brazilians should have any say? I'd take JTWC before I took the Brazilians (I wonder if they issue any warnings for threats to US Navy ships in the region?)


FWIW, it was the Brazilians that raised the flag on 90L/Q/T/whatever this year.
0 likes   

User avatar
Andrew92
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3247
Age: 41
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 12:35 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

#17 Postby Andrew92 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:53 pm

senorpepr wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:After Caterina, are we sure that the Brazilians should have any say? I'd take JTWC before I took the Brazilians (I wonder if they issue any warnings for threats to US Navy ships in the region?)


FWIW, it was the Brazilians that raised the flag on 90L/Q/T/whatever this year.


If I recall correctly, they also called Catarina a "never-before-seen extratropical storm."

My take is this: The NHC should take over for a while. During that time, the Brazilians should be educated on what exactly happened in 2004 so that they are not surprised if it happens again, which it could. Then, when they understand that a few of the storms forming in the Southern Atlantic are in fact tropical storms or of hurricane strength, give the responsibility to the Brazilians. They should also be trained on what exactly makes a tropical storm tropical and not extratropical. That seems to make the most sense to me, but what do I know.

-Andrew92
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#18 Postby Jim Cantore » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:34 pm

Let the NHC do it

Brazils guys didnt know a hurricane when it slapped them literally in the face
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#19 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:39 pm

Hurricane Floyd wrote:Let the NHC do it

Brazils guys didnt know a hurricane when it slapped them literally in the face


lol
0 likes   

StormScanWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:53 pm

#20 Postby StormScanWx » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:51 pm

The National Hurricane Center is part of NOAA, which is part of the Department of Commerce. This is the US government, and we have no territory areas in that region, so I say leave it up to the WMO to decide.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests