Was Hurricane Emily a Category 5?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
StormScanWx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:53 pm

Was Hurricane Emily a Category 5?

#1 Postby StormScanWx » Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:50 pm

Do you think the NHC report will upgrade Emily to a Category 5? I do.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:14 pm

Emily to cat. 5 and Cindy to cat. 1.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#3 Postby Scorpion » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:18 pm

No, Emily was most likely not a Cat 5.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherfreak14
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
Location: Beaufort, SC
Contact:

#4 Postby Weatherfreak14 » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:19 pm

No, Not at any time was emily a CAT 5 but it was a strong CAT 4.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#5 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:19 pm

The nhc said it was for a short time around 03z. In the recon supported cat5...Emily was a cat5!
0 likes   

User avatar
JamesFromMaine2
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Portland Maine USA
Contact:

#6 Postby JamesFromMaine2 » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:23 pm

when recon left it was a 155mph Cat4 after recon left it continued to get better organized but by the time recon got back it had started its ERC and recon found 155mph or less winds and so in the next advisory they said it was more then likely a cat 5 for a short time after recon left!
0 likes   

Scorpion

#7 Postby Scorpion » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:24 pm

929 mb does not make a Cat 5 IMO regardless of the extremely borderline Cat 5 winds.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#8 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:26 pm

Pressure doe's not really matter that much. Also Emily was much smaller then the other cat5s.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#9 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:31 pm

ZCZC MIATCDAT5 ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM
HURRICANE EMILY DISCUSSION NUMBER 26
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
5 AM EDT SUN JUL 17 2005

AT 0324Z...THE AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT
REPORTED FLIGHT-LEVEL WINDS OF 153 KT. THE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT OF
THIS VALUE TO THE SURFACE WOULD YIELD 138 KT...OR JUST ABOVE THE
CATEGORY FIVE THRESHOLD. AT THAT TIME HOWEVER...THE CENTRAL
PRESSURE WAS RISING RAPIDLY AND ON THE NEXT PASS THROUGH THE
NORTHEAST QUADRANT ONLY 132 KT WINDS WERE FOUND. IT IS POSSIBLE
THAT EMILY REACHED CATEGORY FIVE INTENSITY BRIEFLY AROUND 03Z. THE
CURRENT INTENSITY ESTIMATE IS 130 KT. WHILE THE OUTFLOW PATTERN IS
RESTRICTED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT...CONDITIONS ARE OTHERWISE
FAVORABLE FOR EMILY TO REMAIN A MAJOR HURRICANE UNTIL IT REACHES
THE YUCATAN. DEPENDING ON THE PRECISE TRACK...EMILY COULD SPEND
ABOUT 12 HOURS OVER THE YUCATAN PENINSULA...AND SUCH A SMALL SYSTEM
IS LIKELY TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY WEAKENED OVER LAND. HOWEVER...THERE
WILL BE AMPLE TIME IN A LIGHT SHEAR ENVIRONMENT OVER THE WARM GULF
WATERS FOR EMILY TO REGAIN MAJOR HURRICANE STATUS BEFORE ITS FINAL
LANDFALL.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#10 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Jan 01, 2006 6:32 pm

Emily could've (and probably was) a Cat 5 for a few hours. But since it was for only a few hours, they probably won't upgrade it.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jan 01, 2006 7:05 pm

the storm was undergoing some convective disorganization at that time, so the 90% reduction likely did not apply
0 likes   

onetimeposter2
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 8:21 pm

#12 Postby onetimeposter2 » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:13 pm

Here's some likely already viewed evidence.


[img]ftp://ftp.aoml.noaa.gov/pub/hrd/hwind/2005/al05.2005/0717/1330/col02deg.png[/img]

However, as the previous earliest Atlantic basin category five, hurricane Allen, maintained category five intensity for extended periods of time, and as Allen attained category 5 intensity three times during its life, it seems unlikely that what was, at best, a brief event would essentially
represent the earliest time, since about 1851, at which an Atlantic basin tropical cyclone has attained category five intensity. However, in Emily's defense, the event itself may not be epochal; we all know that reliable records only extend a bit over 150 years. And, trivially, the brevity of an event does not prevent its occurence.

In short, I have no idea.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#13 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:20 pm

I know there is evidence to support both sides of the controversy, but, in 2002, Hurricane Elida in the EPAC was thought to attain Cat. 5 intensity for a brief period of time between advisories. Elida died out as a cat. 4 as its top intensity but later in the best track the cyclone was upgraded to cat. 5.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#14 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:24 pm

technically, the H-Wind supports the extreme upper reaches of cat 4. 136KT=155.6 m.p.h., .4 m.p.h. below the cat 5 threshhold
0 likes   

Scorpion

#15 Postby Scorpion » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:30 pm

I don't trust the H Wind Analysis. I saw some of them for Wilma that were just absurd. One of them gave Wilma 112 kt winds even thought it had an 899 mb pressure.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#16 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:08 pm

how one can make a statement like that about H-Wind when one does not know what goes into H-Wind troubles me somewhat

remember, there is not a direct relation between pressure and wind speed
0 likes   

Scorpion

#17 Postby Scorpion » Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:21 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:how one can make a statement like that about H-Wind when one does not know what goes into H-Wind troubles me somewhat

remember, there is not a direct relation between pressure and wind speed


So a hurricane with 899 mb(4th or 5th most powerful pressure recorded) can be a Cat 3?
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#18 Postby MGC » Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:51 pm

Emily may have been a Cat-5. Hurricane hunters drop might have missed the strongest winds......MGC
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38118
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#19 Postby Brent » Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:57 pm

Yes... briefly. I'm not sure it'll be called one in the post-analysis though.
0 likes   
#neversummer

Jim Cantore

#20 Postby Jim Cantore » Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:12 pm

I beleive they will find she was one for at least 6 hours
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jconsor, kenayers, WeatherCat and 67 guests