Are we seeing a precedent for

wxcrazytwo · #1 Postby **wxcrazytwo** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:03 pm

future seasons or is this a freak of mother nature to pull one out of her ***. This is unbelievable, but I think 2006 will bring more surprises...

#2 Postby **vbhoutex** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:06 pm

I think 2006 will be a very active season, but I don't think it will be as active as this year. I do fear that the landfalls we do have will be quite destructive, as they were this year, but I pray they are few and far between(since we know it is almost impossible for us not to have any landfalls).

HouTXmetro · #3 Postby **HouTXmetro** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:08 pm

I'm afraid this may be precedent. Just My opinion.

Swimdude · #4 Postby **Swimdude** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 1:28 pm

I'm thinking, at the very least, all of these broken records show that next year isn't going to be a piece of cake either, unfortunately. I almost feel guilty for enjoying the process of tracking hurricanes. Almost.

#5 Postby **EDR1222** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:05 pm

Well, after 2004, many of us probably thought it would be unlikely to see as many destructive landfalls for 05, myself included, so I wouldn't be surprised if 06 offered up some surprises of its own.

Matt-hurricanewatcher · #6 Postby **Matt-hurricanewatcher** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:08 pm

2006 could easly come close to 2005. I don't think it will beat it in number but in strength come very close. There will be alot more cape verde storms which means it has a chance of getting a few long tracking Ivan. In which it will likely beat the record for ACE.

I also think that southeastern Florida will see a cat5 this year year.

I say

20-22 named storms
12 hurricanes
7 major hurricanes
2 cat5s

#7 Postby **Ivanhater** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 2:12 pm

i dont think there will be as many storms, but i think there will be some monster storms in 2006, remember the days when cat 5's were rare? now they seem to have become the norm :roll:

johngaltfla · #8 Postby **johngaltfla** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 12:26 am

vbhoutex wrote:I think 2006 will be a very active season, but I don't think it will be as active as this year. I do fear that the landfalls we do have will be quite destructive, as they were this year, but I pray they are few and far between(since we know it is almost impossible for us not to have any landfalls).

I hope you are right. We are running out of targets, er, major cities.... :eek:

x-y-no · #9 Postby **x-y-no** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 9:22 am

vbhoutex wrote:I think 2006 will be a very active season, but I don't think it will be as active as this year.

Funny thing is, substitute 2005 for 2006, and this is exactly what I said last year. Boy was I wrong. :eek:

Website · #10 Postby **Brent** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:31 am

I said also said 2005 wouldn't be as active as 2004.

WRONG. :roll:

Are we seeing a precedent for

Are we seeing a precedent for

Who is online