Years of intense storms likely to threaten S. FL

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
zlaxier
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 1:44 pm

Years of intense storms likely to threaten S. FL

#1 Postby zlaxier » Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:49 pm

HURRICANE SEASON

Years of intense storms likely

The official hurricane season is almost over, but the long-term crisis is just beginning, and more storms will threaten South Florida.

BY MARTIN MERZER

mmerzer@herald.com

OK, we're trapped in a period of intense hurricane activity. We accept that now.

But no one is going to like the answers to two key questions that have sobering implications for people and businesses in Florida:

Did the deadly and destructive hurricane season that officially ends Wednesday mark the terrifying peak of this hyperactivity? And, more specifically, will these things keep hitting Florida?

The answers: Probably not, and almost certainly.

''You better learn what good shutters are and you better learn what a good house is and you better learn how to deal with hurricanes,'' said Stanley Goldenberg, a South Florida-based scientist who four years ago coauthored a pioneering -- and prophetic -- report on the upswing in hurricane activity.

``Why do you think the University of Miami's teams are called the Hurricanes? It's because that was normal for Florida, and now these conditions have returned. People shouldn't be scratching their heads.''

The 2001 report by Goldenberg and other experts documented the start of a two- to three-decade period of heightened hurricane activity after 24 relatively inactive seasons. It concluded:

POTENTIAL LOSSES

``Increased occurrence combined with dramatic coastal population increases during the recent lull add up to a potential for massive economic loss. In addition, there remains a potential for catastrophic loss of life in an incomplete evacuation ahead of a rapidly intensifying system.''

And this is just part of the 2005 scorecard:

• A record 25 tropical storms in the Atlantic basin this year.

• A record 13 hurricanes that grew out of those storms.

• A record three top-rank Category 5 hurricanes.

• The first time forecasters ran out of regular storm names.

• The first tropical storm to hit Portugal -- ever.

• Four hurricanes that struck or brushed Florida, adding to the four that smashed into the state in 2004.

And, more painfully, one of the worst natural disasters ever to ravage the United States -- Hurricane Katrina's drowning of much of New Orleans and rampage through other parts of the Gulf Coast, killing more than 1,000 people.

Also a relatively ''weak'' hurricane -- Stan -- that killed more than 1,300 people in Central America and Mexico, and another -- Wilma -- that shocked South Floridians with its destructive ferocity.

''This reconfirms the conclusions we came up with in 2001,'' said Chris Landsea, a leading member of the team that produced the groundbreaking study, published in Science, a prestigious, peer-reviewed journal. ``The upswing started in 1995, but the big impact on the U.S. and especially Florida didn't begin until last year.''

At the time they wrote the report, Goldenberg and Landsea worked for the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration's Hurricane Research Division on Virginia Key.

Goldenberg still works there; Landsea recently transferred to the National Hurricane Center in West Miami-Dade County.

Here is what they and other experts say about our current, perilous situation:

HURRICANE FORMATION

The hyperactivity we've seen in recent years is likely to continue for some time, possibly another 20 or more years.

The reason: Large-scale shifts in global climatology do not flip-flop quickly.

Most scientists believe the ''switch'' that turbocharged the hurricane engine in recent years was a combination of supportive wind patterns and the cyclical return of elevated sea-surface temperatures across a key swath of the Atlantic -- a rise of less than one degree, but enough to pump high-octane fuel into developing storms.

Landsea said the switch doesn't flick very often -- in terms of human time scales -- but when it does, it has dramatic effects.

''When you look at the cycles, it's usually busy or quiet,'' he said. ``It doesn't seem to phase gradually.''

But that doesn't mean that every year within this period will be bizarrely active.

Every now and then, something will come along to temporarily diminish hurricane production. One example: El Niño, the intermittent weather phenomenon that produces warmer-than-normal water in the Pacific, which in turn creates crosswinds that can suppress hurricane formation in the Atlantic.

At the same time, scientists are less impressed than most people by the raw number of recent storms. They prefer a statistical standard -- the Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index -- that measures the strength and duration of all storms over each season.

Even by that measure, the 2005 season has been awful. It produced more than 2 ½ times the overall activity of an average season.

GLOBAL WARMING

There may be plenty to worry about concerning global warming, but its contribution to hurricane formation or intensity remains unclear.

Earlier this year, noted researcher Kerry Emanuel of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology published a report that asserted a statistical link between global warming and a rise in the accumulated power of hurricanes during the past 30 years, with a particularly steep increase since 1995.

But Landsea, Goldenberg and some other experts dispute Emanuel's statistical procedures and his conclusions.

''No credible observational evidence is available or likely will be available in the next few decades which will be able to directly associate global temperature change to changes in global tropical cyclone frequency and intensity,'' prominent hurricane forecaster William Gray of Colorado State University wrote in a rebuttal to Emanuel's study.

Landsea and Goldenberg say global warming may add just a fractional contribution to our hurricane problems.

''People like to embrace global warming because it gives them a scapegoat,'' Goldenberg said. 'They say, `This is not normal. It's some kind of weird thing that's all the government's fault,' instead of saying, 'Hey, guys, this is normal. We're stuck in the hurricanes' path, and that's just the way it is.' ''

When you talk about 'stuck in the hurricanes' path,'' you're talking about Florida.

Not only were more bullets available in the form of more storms, but atmospheric steering currents shifted to our disadvantage, more frequently pointing the gun at Florida and the Gulf Coast.

Most at fault: a high-pressure system generally based in the Atlantic -- known as the Bermuda High -- that has been meandering in a way unfriendly to Florida. Hurricanes, which are low-pressure systems, are often steered by stronger high-pressure systems.

These phenomena defy long-term prediction, but they also tend to persist.

''If the past is a key to the future as regards steering, it seems like certain steering patterns have hung around for several years to a decade,'' Goldenberg said.

We hate to bring this up, but during the last period of heightened activity, Miami-Dade absorbed strikes or brushes by 17 hurricanes between 1926 and 1965, one every two or three years. Many of those storms also affected Broward County.

The implications for South Floridians are obvious.

''Having two hurricanes, Katrina and Wilma, strike Miami [and Broward] in one year is a rare event,'' Landsea said. ``We won't be seeing that kind of impact every year, but a fact of life is that you have to decide for yourself if the increased risks are worth it.

``To me, living in South Florida is great 99 percent of the time. Well, maybe 98 percent of the time.''

Goldenberg also lives in South Florida. His family almost died when his house was destroyed by Hurricane Andrew in 1992.

`FACT IS FACT'

''I don't like what I'm saying,'' he said. ``I don't necessarily enjoy going through hurricanes, but fact is fact.''

And now, with the official season ending but the long-term crisis still at an early stage, he and other experts sympathize with those who lost their lives to hurricanes in New Orleans, Biloxi and elsewhere, including South Florida.

''What's it going to take to educate people that a hurricane is a very, very dangerous event, and if you take it seriously and respond appropriately, you can do a lot to protect your life and property?'' Goldenberg said.

``But if you take it lightly, you can be in for a rude awakening -- or not awaken at all.''
0 likes   

aerojad
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

#2 Postby aerojad » Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:34 pm

Actually, Florida is at a good risk of intense hurricanes from the last ice age thru the next one.


It kinda... sits out there in the tracks of storms. Active period or not. It's still there, and storms will still come.
0 likes   

User avatar
CharleySurvivor
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 3:38 pm
Location: Tampa, FL formerly Port Charlotte FL

#3 Postby CharleySurvivor » Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:26 am

I couldn't have said it any better.

Anyone who wants to live in Florida knows hurricanes come with the State. It's not something new; we have just entered a period of busier activity from them.
0 likes   

aerojad
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

#4 Postby aerojad » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:02 am

Indeed.

If people say that *now* Florida will be hit by big storms and during unactive cycles they won't, I just have one thing to say to them - Andrew.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#5 Postby x-y-no » Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:14 pm

Good article. Thanks.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#6 Postby f5 » Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm

when you choose an adress you choose a natural disaster for example
you live in California-Earthquakes
You live in Pacific Northwest-volcanoes
You live along the gulf coast-Hurricanes
You live in the Midwest-Tornadoes afterall its called tornado alley for a reason
0 likes   

User avatar
Cookiely
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3211
Age: 74
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
Location: Tampa, Florida

#7 Postby Cookiely » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:12 pm

f5 wrote:when you choose an adress you choose a natural disaster for example
you live in California-Earthquakes
You live in Pacific Northwest-volcanoes
You live along the gulf coast-Hurricanes
You live in the Midwest-Tornadoes afterall its called tornado alley for a reason

You can add blizzards to the list.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#8 Postby f5 » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:22 pm

blizzards you can handle depends on how much you love snow.they don't cause the kind of death&destruction you see with the above list
0 likes   

aerojad
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

#9 Postby aerojad » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:49 pm

Yeah, blizzards are the first natural disaster that I think it's safe to assume members of this country have beaten.

Stay inside in a heated location, have food, wait three days, the end.
0 likes   

User avatar
JamesFromMaine2
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Portland Maine USA
Contact:

#10 Postby JamesFromMaine2 » Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:01 am

How about adding Ice Storms! In 1998 here in New England we had a really bad ice storm there were many people with out power for weeks and some people were even killed! Mostly older people from not having power and it being so cold.
0 likes   

User avatar
johngaltfla
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
Location: Sarasota County, FL
Contact:

#11 Postby johngaltfla » Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:29 pm

CharleySurvivor wrote:I couldn't have said it any better.

Anyone who wants to live in Florida knows hurricanes come with the State. It's not something new; we have just entered a period of busier activity from them.


Yes but with 3 Cat 5's in one season, just how long is it until the big Cat 5 wipes Tampa or Miami off the map.

With a direct hit.

Mother Nature has a perverse sense of humor and way of making up for decades of what us natives have naively called "luck" by destroying everything we know. I just spoke to a friend today who got back from a trip to Mobile, AL which finished in Metarie, LA.

If a Katrina hit Tampa or Miami, I can promise you one thing:

Florida would depopulate quickly as everyone gave up and moved out.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#12 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:42 pm

johngaltfla wrote:
CharleySurvivor wrote:I couldn't have said it any better.

Anyone who wants to live in Florida knows hurricanes come with the State. It's not something new; we have just entered a period of busier activity from them.


Yes but with 3 Cat 5's in one season, just how long is it until the big Cat 5 wipes Tampa or Miami off the map.

With a direct hit.

Mother Nature has a perverse sense of humor and way of making up for decades of what us natives have naively called "luck" by destroying everything we know. I just spoke to a friend today who got back from a trip to Mobile, AL which finished in Metarie, LA.

If a Katrina hit Tampa or Miami, I can promise you one thing:

Florida would depopulate quickly as everyone gave up and moved out.


If a Katrina type storm were to hit Tampa or Miami....It would be
horrific like the damage seen on the Mississippi and Louisiana
Gulf Coast...Florida would depopulate significantly....people get to
a point where if a horrific catastrophe were to take place...it's
just too horrible to stay...
0 likes   

dolebot_Broward_NW
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am

#13 Postby dolebot_Broward_NW » Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:39 pm

Florida would depopulate quickly as everyone gave up and moved out.


I'm not so certain that isn't happening right now. Case in point... I just renewed my lease starting Dec 1st. Back in September when I started talking to the apartment people they were quoting an increase to $970/month, up from the $780/month (Yes, a $190/month INCREASE), and they were dead serious. They cited increased demand, and their 6 month 49 party waiting list. Just after Wilma I went in again to see what could be done, and suddenly they have 10% empty apartments and my rent only went up $30 LOL. Of course it could just be their own pigheaded total insanity rent that caused it, but when I checked around and back in September other complexes with similar apartments that were going for just shy of a grand back then, are now around the same price as I pay again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

#14 Postby Windtalker1 » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:40 am

JamesFromMaine2 wrote:How about adding Ice Storms! In 1998 here in New England we had a really bad ice storm there were many people with out power for weeks and some people were even killed! Mostly older people from not having power and it being so cold.
When I was growing up in Connecticut, there was a winter storm by the name of "Felix" (they name winter storms up there) I can remember that it too was a very bad Ice/Snow Storm. Must of been in 74 or so.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jconsor, Ulf and 54 guests