What is the best looking eye you've ever seen on a hurricane
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
What is the best looking eye you've ever seen on a hurricane
With all the talk about Wilmas little pinhole I'm curious on peoples opinions here
I dont go back further then the late 80s because images where not very good before then
I dont go back further then the late 80s because images where not very good before then
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 146240
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

My most impressive one has been Isabels with those many mini vortices.
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- WindRunner
- Category 5
- Posts: 5806
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
- Contact:
A large eye on a semi-annular hurricane like Katrina or Rita really makes the storm look small. Katrina and Rita were much larger than Wilma at her peak, but Wilma looks a like a huge storm (Typhoon Tip style) because her eye is small.
I call them semi-annular because they don't have extensive outer bands.
I call them semi-annular because they don't have extensive outer bands.
0 likes
I think Katrina had one of the most perfectly symmetric, incredibly cold CDOs I've seen in a while. That storm was incredible when it bombed out in the southeastern/southcentral Gulf of Mexico. Rita looked very nice as well (as would be expected with a <900mb Cat 5), but I don't think it's CDO was quite as symmetric as Katrina's. Wilma is inherently impressive because of it's incredible intensity, but it didn't seem AS symmetric as Katrina. The eye was so small that vis sat imagery didn't capture it too well (including MODIS/Rapidfire imagery, which usually provides beautiful images). So, with all that said, my vote goes to Katrina.
P.S. -- has anyone noticed that the "Post Reply" and "New Thread" buttons on the bottop of threads are switched? For example, if you press "Post Reply", you get the "start new thread" screen, and vice versa for the "new thread" button.
P.S. -- has anyone noticed that the "Post Reply" and "New Thread" buttons on the bottop of threads are switched? For example, if you press "Post Reply", you get the "start new thread" screen, and vice versa for the "new thread" button.
0 likes
- wxmann_91
- Category 5
- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
WxGuy1 wrote:I think Katrina had one of the most perfectly symmetric, incredibly cold CDOs I've seen in a while. That storm was incredible when it bombed out in the southeastern/southcentral Gulf of Mexico. Rita looked very nice as well (as would be expected with a <900mb Cat 5), but I don't think it's CDO was quite as symmetric as Katrina's. Wilma is inherently impressive because of it's incredible intensity, but it didn't seem AS symmetric as Katrina. The eye was so small that vis sat imagery didn't capture it too well (including MODIS/Rapidfire imagery, which usually provides beautiful images). So, with all that said, my vote goes to Katrina.
I agree. Actually for me it was tough to say Katrina or Wilma. Out of all the Cat 5's this year, Rita was the ugliest.
For the eye was too small problem with Wilma, perhaps this satellite image will resolve that issue:

Compare that to Rita and Katrina:
(Rita)

(Katrina)

0 likes
WxGuy1 wrote:I think Katrina had one of the most perfectly symmetric, incredibly cold CDOs I've seen in a while. That storm was incredible when it bombed out in the southeastern/southcentral Gulf of Mexico. Rita looked very nice as well (as would be expected with a <900mb Cat 5), but I don't think it's CDO was quite as symmetric as Katrina's. Wilma is inherently impressive because of it's incredible intensity, but it didn't seem AS symmetric as Katrina. The eye was so small that vis sat imagery didn't capture it too well (including MODIS/Rapidfire imagery, which usually provides beautiful images).
No way man. Satellite imagery of Wilma at its peak was beautiful. And don't get me started on how cold the cloud tops were.


0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 86 guests