Northern GOM landfalls
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Northern GOM landfalls
it seems like everytime there is a CAT 4 or 5 in the GOM they seem to always weaken ex Lili,Ivan,Dennis,Opal,Federic,Georges ect
0 likes
-
Anonymous
-
Anonymous
mtm4319 wrote:~Floydbuster wrote:Sometimes, we get lucky...examples:::
Ivan, Dennis, Lili
Sometimes, we get them as Cat 4-5....examples:::
Camille, Frederic, Katrina
I thought Frederic was a strong Cat 3.
I think it is classified as 115 kt or 130 mph, so technically a cat 3, but really a technicality.
0 likes
-
HurricaneBill
- Category 5

- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
-
Derek Ortt
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Lowpressure wrote:Frederic-135 mph 27.99 pressure at landfall. Ocean Springs MS, I was there.
Are you saying that Frederic made landfall in Ocean Springs, MS? Actually, Frederic made landfall between the MS/AL state line and Mobile Bay. Ocean Springs was outside the western eyewall - about 30 miles west of landfall. Ocean Springs was probably outside the sustained 75 mph wind field. My mother was in Pascagoula for Frederic. She just passed through the western part of the eye. I was on the phone with her when the wind calmed down briefly.
Last edited by wxman57 on Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- beachbum_al
- Category 5

- Posts: 2163
- Age: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
- Location: South Alabama Coast
- Contact:
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met

- Posts: 23080
- Age: 68
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
To answer the mail question posed in this thread, there is a very good reason why many hurricanes are weakening as they approach the northern Gulf Coast. Most hurricanes reach maximum intensity while trapped beneath the subtopical high to the north. They would be moving to the west while at max intensity. Outflow is generally best and shear is lower with a westward-moving hurricane. But once the hurricane makes a turn to the north, it's exposed to increasing wind shear across the northern Gulf, and possibly dry air entrainment. Upper-level winds are rarely as favorable for development with a northward-moving hurricane.
So it makes perfect sense that the majority of hurricanes weaken once they make the turn and begin moving to the north. The weakening doesn't necessarily happen immediately, but weakening is more likely to occur closer to the Gulf Coast as wind shear increases just prior to landfall.
So it makes perfect sense that the majority of hurricanes weaken once they make the turn and begin moving to the north. The weakening doesn't necessarily happen immediately, but weakening is more likely to occur closer to the Gulf Coast as wind shear increases just prior to landfall.
0 likes
HurricaneBill wrote:I think someone said the hurricanes that pose the biggest threat of a major landfall are the ones that enter the Gulf as a Category 2.
Although, I'm curious. Would a midget hurricane like Charley have weakened as much if he moved towards the panhandle?
Charley a midget?
0 likes
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator

- Posts: 12542
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
arkess7 wrote:HurricaneBill wrote:I think someone said the hurricanes that pose the biggest threat of a major landfall are the ones that enter the Gulf as a Category 2.
Although, I'm curious. Would a midget hurricane like Charley have weakened as much if he moved towards the panhandle?
Charley a midget?I dont think so.....yea it might not have been a big hurricane like katrina or rita....but ive never seen so much damage 100 to 150 miles inland in Orlando in my life!!!!! Just awful!!!! My parents and friends all had no power for a week or more and damage to millions of peoples homes.......and there are so many trees gone......and then Punta Gorda was just devestated......We didnt get a drop or rain from Charley up here....but i drove down and visited family and freinds and will never forget how my 'hometown' was damaged.
I think he was referring to Charley's size as "midget-like," not his strength.
0 likes
-
john potter
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:07 pm
On rare occasions, northward moving hurricanes are embedded in the eastern flows of strong troughs (troughs very pronounced even at 300 mb levels) -- in such cases, rapidly moving hurricanes retain surface form and intensity into higher latitudes; examples: Hazle in 1954, the 1938 Great New England Hurricane (with hurricane windfield still intact in Ontario); I have to wonder what were the surrounding dynamics that preserved Camille's Cat 5 intensity at its MS landfall?
0 likes
Lindaloo wrote:mtm4319 wrote:~Floydbuster wrote:Sometimes, we get lucky...examples:::
Ivan, Dennis, Lili
Sometimes, we get them as Cat 4-5....examples:::
Camille, Frederic, Katrina
I thought Frederic was a strong Cat 3.
Frederic was a 4.
The NHC says otherwise. I realize it was probably a borderline case, but living in Mobile all my life I've heard quite a lot about Frederic, and all of what I've heard is that it was considered a Category 3.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 274 guests




