Why 12 and not 10

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
chadtm80

Why 12 and not 10

#1 Postby chadtm80 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:15 pm

From the discussion

The NWS rules governing the naming of tropical cyclones specify
that...within a basin...when a cyclone forms from the remnant of a
previously existing cyclone...the old name/number is retained.
Tropical Depression Twelve has a complex genesis that likely
includes a mid-level remnant of former Tropical Depression Ten. A
review of satellite and rawinsonde data over the past week or so
suggests that a second disturbance approached and combined with the
mid-level remnant of Tropical Depression Ten on 20 August. Because
it is impossible to determine which of these two systems is
associated with today's genesis...we have elected to use the
designation twelve rather than ten for the new depression. This
situation differs from last year's regeneration of Ivan...in which
the low-level remnant of that system remained a distinct feature
that could be followed continuously until it regenerated.
Forecaster Stewart
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Why 12 and not 10

#2 Postby dwg71 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:18 pm

chadtm80 wrote:From the discussion

The NWS rules governing the naming of tropical cyclones specify
that...within a basin...when a cyclone forms from the remnant of a
previously existing cyclone...the old name/number is retained.
Tropical Depression Twelve has a complex genesis that likely
includes a mid-level remnant of former Tropical Depression Ten. A
review of satellite and rawinsonde data over the past week or so
suggests that a second disturbance approached and combined with the
mid-level remnant of Tropical Depression Ten on 20 August. Because
it is impossible to determine which of these two systems is
associated with today's genesis...we have elected to use the
designation twelve rather than ten for the new depression. This
situation differs from last year's regeneration of Ivan...in which
the low-level remnant of that system remained a distinct feature
that could be followed continuously until it regenerated.
Forecaster Stewart


They went with 12, because I said that a TC over Arizona had a better chance of developing than did xTD10. So technically I was right, but I think 10 played at least some part in it. I had to send a Vermont Teddy bear to the NHC, but it was money well spent.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

#3 Postby Portastorm » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:31 pm

Isn't Stewart great? He always seems to have the best discussions and provides insights and explanations we don't seem to get elsewhere.

I really appreciate his service!
0 likes   

hurricanefreak1988
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 869
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:13 pm
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Contact:

#4 Postby hurricanefreak1988 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:40 pm

Yeah, I like him. I'd say he's one of my favorites. Meanwhile, Franklin keeps babbling on about how every named storm is the earliest for that letter on record. Can you say, duh? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: Why 12 and not 10

#5 Postby southerngale » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:44 pm

dwg71 wrote:
They went with 12, because I said that a TC over Arizona had a better chance of developing than did xTD10. So technically I was right, but I think 10 played at least some part in it. I had to send a Vermont Teddy bear to the NHC, but it was money well spent.


Those are so cute!
0 likes   

Coredesat

#6 Postby Coredesat » Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:50 pm

hurricanefreak1988 wrote:Yeah, I like him. I'd say he's one of my favorites. Meanwhile, Franklin keeps babbling on about how every named storm is the earliest for that letter on record. Can you say, duh? :lol:


The forecaster, not the storm? :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests