GFS new model run has lost TD 9

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

GFS new model run has lost TD 9

#1 Postby JTD » Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:55 pm

Latest GFS run seems to have lost TD 9. Looks like not much development at all from this system can be expected.

It does depict TD 9 just not as a low anymore.
Last edited by JTD on Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:04 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: GFS new model run has lost Irene!!!

#2 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:58 pm

jason0509 wrote:Looks like not much development at all from this system can be expected.

You're not taking the GFS seriously, are you? And thats just a summary of what it says.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#3 Postby JTD » Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:59 pm

It's actually fairly good and other models lose this system too.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#4 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Aug 04, 2005 11:59 pm

jason0509 wrote:It's actually fairly good and other models lose this system too.

SO you think Irene will not develop.

I can't believe this is already starting...

I guess people forget how everybody was writing off Emily early on and we know how it ended up...
Last edited by jkt21787 on Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#5 Postby Stratosphere747 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:00 am

Unless this has been classified as a named storm...Then please change the name of your topic...
0 likes   

WXFIEND
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Contact:

...

#6 Postby WXFIEND » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:00 am

aand what models will THAT be?

this is a Grade A case... remember, its METEOROLOGY, not MODELology....

you have to know when to cut the line between the weather and what the models say
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#7 Postby JTD » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:01 am

Stratosphere747 wrote:Unless this has been classified as a named storm...Then please change the name of your topic...


:grr: Sometimes mistakes are made, especially at this time of night.
Last edited by JTD on Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: ...

#8 Postby jkt21787 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:03 am

WXFIEND wrote:aand what models will THAT be?

this is a Grade A case... remember, its METEOROLOGY, not MODELology....

you have to know when to cut the line between the weather and what the models say

Very nicely said.

It really ticks me off that people say this storm is/will be a dud or not organize much or whatever (and its not just here where its being said) and it hasn't even been developed for 24hours!! Nobody is forecasting any sort of rapid intensification for days, a very slow or flat intensification rate.
Last edited by jkt21787 on Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#9 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:03 am

Perhaps before everybody jumps in I should say that with every model, continuity is the key to establishing a trend.

If Global Fairy system still says this this time tomorrow then I'll be worried, but let's just say that this is one model run. The overall trend still suggests a fairly potent system.

Remember when the GFS had Emily hitting the central TX coastline? Then we all know what happened. And many of the other models are based on the GFS, so don't worry if all of a sudden many of the models kill Irene early in the game.
0 likes   

WXFIEND
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:47 pm
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Contact:

...

#10 Postby WXFIEND » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:05 am

gracias.

It looks as if you seem to know not to trust this run, sorry for jumping on you. I just got the vibe you supported it at first.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#11 Postby Stratosphere747 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:05 am

jason0509 wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:Unless this has been classified as a named storm...Then please change the name of your topic...


:grr: Sometimes mistakes are made, especially at this time of night.


Not a problem Jason...;)

I'm not a mod, but still old school....

Scott
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#12 Postby JTD » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:06 am

From the NHC discussion:

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE 18Z GFS MODEL
DID NOT APPEAR TO INITIALIZE THE CYCLONE WELL...WHILE THE 18Z
NOGAPS MODEL DISSIPATED THE SYSTEM IN LESS THAN 72 HR.

This is not the 1st model to dissipate the system.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#13 Postby JTD » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:10 am

Stratosphere747 wrote:
jason0509 wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:Unless this has been classified as a named storm...Then please change the name of your topic...


:grr: Sometimes mistakes are made, especially at this time of night.


Not a problem Jason...;)

I'm not a mod, but still old school....

Scott


LOL. I don't know why I called it Irene! Of course, thanks for picking up on that especially given the content of the post.

I'm going to need to see it actually develop to buy into the hype now.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#14 Postby clfenwi » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:17 am

GFS routinely lost Emily during her developmental stages.

Also, it doesn't lose the system, it just fades in and out... here it as it 168 h for example:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_168s.gif

full loop:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml
0 likes   

floridahurricaneguy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:37 pm
Location: Tampa,FL
Contact:

#15 Postby floridahurricaneguy » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:19 am

I was wondering if it was just me who could not find it on GFS latest run. I was getting ready to post my own topic when I saw this. Very interesting. Will be intersting to see what the next run says.
0 likes   

User avatar
ALhurricane
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Daphne, AL

#16 Postby ALhurricane » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:32 am

Taking a look at a loop of the 850mb vorticity chart, you can get a better idea of what the GFS wants to do with the system

Basically takes it on a WNW course through 180hrs. After 180 is when the GFS goes into la la land (talk about meteorological jargon) and drives the system southwest into Cuba.

The idea I would take out of the 00z GFS is that it is indicating there is not much of any feature to turn it north at this time.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... loop.shtml

Once again, just one run of the GFS, but I really can't argue with a long duration WNW track either.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#17 Postby TS Zack » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:35 am

jkt21787 wrote:
jason0509 wrote:It's actually fairly good and other models lose this system too.

SO you think Irene will not develop.

I can't believe this is already starting...

I guess people forget how everybody was writing off Emily early on and we know how it ended up...


TRUE!
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#18 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:35 am

ALhurricane wrote:After 180 is when the GFS goes into la la land (talk about meteorological jargon) and drives the system southwest into Cuba.


Actually it has the system splitting into two parts, one that will move southwestward over Cuba and the Yucatan and then reemerging in the Bay of Campeche as a tropical cyclone.

Yea, good old GFS. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
ALhurricane
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 452
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Daphne, AL

#19 Postby ALhurricane » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:37 am

Well the big reason the GFS starts to give odd looking solutions past 180hrs is because the model resolution truncates at that point.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#20 Postby TS Zack » Fri Aug 05, 2005 12:39 am

LOL Jason. It has TD 9 in the Bay Of Campeche in 360hrs.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DESTRUCTION5, Team Ghost and 288 guests