Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
His video was quite short today.
He believes Emily will become a GOM threat.....possible W GOM. He expects Emily to in the NW Caribbean approaching the Yucatan next Sunday.
He believes Franklin will take a more N route and is very concerned about the strength of the Bermuda High. Could be a FLA or SE US threat from Franklin.
His quote "Its 1933 all over again"
He believes Emily will become a GOM threat.....possible W GOM. He expects Emily to in the NW Caribbean approaching the Yucatan next Sunday.
He believes Franklin will take a more N route and is very concerned about the strength of the Bermuda High. Could be a FLA or SE US threat from Franklin.
His quote "Its 1933 all over again"
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5

- Posts: 4430
- Age: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
- Portastorm
- Storm2k Moderator

- Posts: 9914
- Age: 63
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Round Rock, TX
- Contact:
Re: Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
KatDaddy wrote:His video was quite short today.
He believes Emily will become a GOM threat.....possible W GOM. He expects Emily to in the NW Caribbean approaching the Yucatan next Sunday.
He believes Franklin will take a more N route and is very concerned about the strength of the Bermuda High. Could be a FLA or SE US threat from Franklin.
His quote "Its 1933 all over again"
Also important to note from his column that he:
1) acknowledged that TPC blew him out of the water re: Dennis, and that his landfall location ideas were flat out wrong.
2) gave big-time kudos to TPC and their forecasters for doing such a good job on Dennis landfall ideas.
0 likes
-
jlauderdal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
- Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
- Contact:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:JB is still Trying to Get Dennis to come back and Strike LA...The man is so full of himself its not even funny...
NHC had their track problems a few years ago but it seems like last season and now this one they have been very good. I will be listening to NHC until further notice.
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Well, I take issue with his naming these systems in advance of data, especially "Franklin". I expect they both will develop, but nonetheless ...
I also take exception to his little "when they get around to naming it" jab - not that it's so offensive in isolation, but taken in the context of his ongoing campaign to belittle the NHC it's annoying. This pattern of scoffing and little digs has turned my attitude to JB from one of admiration and liking to one of anger and disgust. The NHC has constraints he doesn't have - and whatever their private opinion of the state of a system may be, they cannot take official action with regard to a system in advance of real data supporting that action.
This whole trend on his part is sad, really, because he's a sharp meteorologist and quite good at what he does. But apparently either something deep in his personality or perhaps marketing considerations have prompted him to engage in the sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant but always despicable campaign.
That said, I have no issues with the analysis he gives in the video. Makes good sense to me.
Jan
I also take exception to his little "when they get around to naming it" jab - not that it's so offensive in isolation, but taken in the context of his ongoing campaign to belittle the NHC it's annoying. This pattern of scoffing and little digs has turned my attitude to JB from one of admiration and liking to one of anger and disgust. The NHC has constraints he doesn't have - and whatever their private opinion of the state of a system may be, they cannot take official action with regard to a system in advance of real data supporting that action.
This whole trend on his part is sad, really, because he's a sharp meteorologist and quite good at what he does. But apparently either something deep in his personality or perhaps marketing considerations have prompted him to engage in the sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant but always despicable campaign.
That said, I have no issues with the analysis he gives in the video. Makes good sense to me.
Jan
0 likes
- x-y-no
- Category 5

- Posts: 8359
- Age: 65
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
Portastorm wrote:Also important to note from his column that he:
1) acknowledged that TPC blew him out of the water re: Dennis, and that his landfall location ideas were flat out wrong.
2) gave big-time kudos to TPC and their forecasters for doing such a good job on Dennis landfall ideas.
Yeah, he'll admit the obvious once in a while. But then he goes right back to his eye-rolling and chuckles and little digs, and occasionally on full-blown childish rants.
What happened to his resolve never to mention NHC again and not even to use storm names? I would have sworn that was just a couple of weeks ago. But here he is, naming a wave just off Africa "Franklin" already, and making little jabs about "when [NHC] gets around to naming" Emily-to-be.
Jan
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive

- Posts: 29133
- Age: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
x-y-no wrote:Well, I take issue with his naming these systems in advance of data, especially "Franklin". I expect they both will develop, but nonetheless ...
I also take exception to his little "when they get around to naming it" jab - not that it's so offensive in isolation, but taken in the context of his ongoing campaign to belittle the NHC it's annoying. This pattern of scoffing and little digs has turned my attitude to JB from one of admiration and liking to one of anger and disgust. The NHC has constraints he doesn't have - and whatever their private opinion of the state of a system may be, they cannot take official action with regard to a system in advance of real data supporting that action.
This whole trend on his part is sad, really, because he's a sharp meteorologist and quite good at what he does. But apparently either something deep in his personality or perhaps marketing considerations have prompted him to engage in the sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant but always despicable campaign.
That said, I have no issues with the analysis he gives in the video. Makes good sense to me.
Jan
I think this(the bolded part) is what is going on with Joe B. The Joe B I know from emails is not the one I am hearing about.
0 likes
-
frankthetank
- Category 2

- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:16 pm
- Location: La Crosse, WI
Re: Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
x-y-no wrote:Portastorm wrote:Also important to note from his column that he:
1) acknowledged that TPC blew him out of the water re: Dennis, and that his landfall location ideas were flat out wrong.
2) gave big-time kudos to TPC and their forecasters for doing such a good job on Dennis landfall ideas.
Yeah, he'll admit the obvious once in a while. But then he goes right back to his eye-rolling and chuckles and little digs, and occasionally on full-blown childish rants.
What happened to his resolve never to mention NHC again and not even to use storm names? I would have sworn that was just a couple of weeks ago. But here he is, naming a wave just off Africa "Franklin" already, and making little jabs about "when [NHC] gets around to naming" Emily-to-be.
Jan
He's a smart guy, too bad his arrogant and brash, and quite frankly ,rude.
I don't watch him for those reasons.
What's the "payback" for him completely mising the NOLA landfall for Dennis? NOTHING.
Had the NHC done what he did, there would be congressional hearings
scheduled and reads rolling.
The NHC does exceptional work with tropical systems.
You want a simple demonstration on how tricky the forecasting is?
Fill your bathtub up, and place 4-5 ping-pong balls in the tub.
Move your hand around in the water and try to tell in advance where the
balls will end up.
That's a grossly simplified example of what the NHC has to work with for
fluid dynamics. You have to add in the atmosphere, ocean conditions, and other issues to begin trying to forecast these things. A tremendous amount of knowledge and skill is required.
0 likes
-
GalvestonDuck
- Category 5

- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
Re: Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
dhweather wrote:
Fill your bathtub up, and place 4-5 ping-pong balls in the tub.
Move your hand around in the water and try to tell in advance where the
balls will end up.
That's a grossly simplified example of what the NHC has to work with for
fluid dynamics. You have to add in the atmosphere, ocean conditions, and other issues to begin trying to forecast these things. A tremendous amount of knowledge and skill is required.
Darn, I thought I had a good preparedness idea now. Looks like it probably wouldn't work.

0 likes
Re: Joe B on future Emily and Franklin
dhweather wrote:x-y-no wrote:Portastorm wrote:Also important to note from his column that he:
1) acknowledged that TPC blew him out of the water re: Dennis, and that his landfall location ideas were flat out wrong.
2) gave big-time kudos to TPC and their forecasters for doing such a good job on Dennis landfall ideas.
Yeah, he'll admit the obvious once in a while. But then he goes right back to his eye-rolling and chuckles and little digs, and occasionally on full-blown childish rants.
What happened to his resolve never to mention NHC again and not even to use storm names? I would have sworn that was just a couple of weeks ago. But here he is, naming a wave just off Africa "Franklin" already, and making little jabs about "when [NHC] gets around to naming" Emily-to-be.
Jan
He's a smart guy, too bad his arrogant and brash, and quite frankly ,rude.
I don't watch him for those reasons.
What's the "payback" for him completely mising the NOLA landfall for Dennis? NOTHING.
Had the NHC done what he did, there would be congressional hearings
scheduled and reads rolling.
The NHC does exceptional work with tropical systems.
You want a simple demonstration on how tricky the forecasting is?
Fill your bathtub up, and place 4-5 ping-pong balls in the tub.
Move your hand around in the water and try to tell in advance where the
balls will end up.
That's a grossly simplified example of what the NHC has to work with for
fluid dynamics. You have to add in the atmosphere, ocean conditions, and other issues to begin trying to forecast these things. A tremendous amount of knowledge and skill is required.
What models to use for such forecasting?
The PPFDL? (pingpong Fluid Dynamics Lab)
PAMD (Pingpong Advection Model, Deeptub)
PAMM (Pingpong Advection Model, Mediumtub)
The PFS?
Good points on the difficulties of fluid dynamics. Forecasting the atmosphere, as one scientist said (was it Lorentz...can't remember now) is the ultimate non-linier problem to solve.
Tropical forecasting is the hardest subset of atmospheric forecasting IMHO...which is probably why I am so interested in the field...
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
x-y-no wrote:Duffy wrote:JOe B Rules!!!!!!
Jan, you got serious issues with him, relax
I'll relax when he stops playing his little part in his employer's smear campaign against NOAA related to their effort at legalized theft on a monumental scale.
Jan
Interesting...the 11AM discussion somewhat deals...perhaps...with one of these digs you mention.
I PREFER TO FOLLOW THE BROADER SYSTEM AT THIS
TIME. THE POOR ORGANIZATION OF THE SYSTEM...AND DVORAK
CLASSIFICATIONS FROM TAFB AND SAB OF T2.0...ARE GOOD REASONS NOT TO UPGRADE THE DEPRESSION TO A TROPICAL STORM.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 351 guests




