TD 3 looking sick
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Huckster
- Category 1

- Posts: 394
- Age: 43
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
TD 3 looking sick
Despite continued convection in the bands to the north and east of the center, this thing is looking sick. It looks like it's ingested dry air. The convection near the center just can't quite get going. Also, the impressive outflow on the west is really being inhibited now. It looks like the shear factor is starting to kick in. I think the farther this thing goes west, the weaker it will remain.
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: TD 3 looking sick
Huckster wrote:Despite continued convection in the bands to the north and east of the center, this thing is looking sick. It looks like it's ingested dry air. The convection near the center just can't quite get going. Also, the impressive outflow on the west is really being inhibited now. It looks like the shear factor is starting to kick in. I think the farther this thing goes west, the weaker it will remain.
I wouldn't say that so soon.
0 likes
-
Rainband
-
Rainband
- Wnghs2007
- Category 5

- Posts: 6836
- Age: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
- Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
- Contact:
mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
0 likes
Wnghs2007 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
0 likes
- Wnghs2007
- Category 5

- Posts: 6836
- Age: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:14 pm
- Location: Gwinnett-Barrow Line; Georgia
- Contact:
mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
Oh and using a reduction ratio...
49 knts - 4.9 knts aka 10% = 44.1 knts
or
49 knts - 7.4 knts aka 15% = 41.6 knts
0 likes
Wnghs2007 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
Oh and using a reduction ratio...
49 knts - 4.9 knts aka 10% = 44.1 knts
or
49 knts - 7.4 knts aka 15% = 41.6 knts
They find a couple more of those in that NE quad you can bet we will have Cindy!
0 likes
-
Rainband
I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.mobilebay wrote:Wnghs2007 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
0 likes
Rainband wrote:I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.mobilebay wrote:Wnghs2007 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
O'h it is not well organized by any stretch of the imagination.
0 likes
-
Rainband
It is still not a typical TS.mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:I am going by the symmetry and agree it may have strong gusts but I agree with the post I read that said it looks to be embedded in the trof and elongated.mobilebay wrote:Wnghs2007 wrote:mobilebay wrote:Rainband wrote:Doesn't matter what you use. Flight level winds are always higher. One observation doesn't matter. It looks like a sheared shrimp.
Maybe so but they just found a 49KT wind in the SE quad too.
And the NE side is usually the strongest quad and it does have the strongest convection now so one could only guestimate that they will find even higher winds there.
Exactly. Like D. Ortt says you can't always go by IR Imagery!
O'h it is not well organized by any stretch of the imagination.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: KirbyDude25, Team Ghost and 617 guests
