Possible Kennedy Space Center catastrophe

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
chakalakasp

Possible Kennedy Space Center catastrophe

#1 Postby chakalakasp » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:46 pm

Not sure if anyone has addressed this yet.

If the storm takes the current forecast path (which is still very much in question, as the NHS's margin of error this far out is rather large), Frances will come very close to NASA's Kennedy Space Center -- right over top of it, in fact.

The buildings at the space center are only designed to withstand max winds of 125 (that's gusts, not sustained.)

The Cape is only 9 feet above sea level. Storm surge could conservatively reach 10 to 15 feet, possibly much more.

All of the Space Shuttles are currently stationed at the Cape.

I hope the storm pulls furter north, or we may not have much of a shuttle fleet left next week.
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#2 Postby coriolis » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:55 pm

Seems that NASA is facing the same decision as many civilians: To evacuate or not to evacuate. I'd think that they'd have time to strap the shuttles on that 747 and get 'em out of there.
0 likes   
This space for rent.

jaysonx
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 5:19 pm
Location: Mays Landing, NJ

#3 Postby jaysonx » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:57 pm

I am sure there is a pretty big procedure in getting those things on top of that 747... I doubt they could pull it off in a day and 1/2.. but who knows.

Somehow I think that they will do ok.. they have all the technology in the world, I would think that they would have eventually prepared for this possibility.
0 likes   

chakalakasp

#4 Postby chakalakasp » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:59 pm

coriolis wrote:Seems that NASA is facing the same decision as many civilians: To evacuate or not to evacuate. I'd think that they'd have time to strap the shuttles on that 747 and get 'em out of there.


There is no time for that. That takes weeks.

This link explains what they've decided to do... mostly, batten the hatches, wrap everything in plastic, sandbag, and pray.

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/frances_ksc.html
0 likes   

Guest

#5 Postby Guest » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:02 pm

hopefully the space shuttles don't die if it hits Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#6 Postby dhweather » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:05 pm

The shuttles sit on the mammoth movers, getting them up and additional 20-30 feet, and the vehicle buildings are cat 3/4 rated.
0 likes   

User avatar
coriolis
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 8314
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Muncy, PA

#7 Postby coriolis » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:07 pm

Good luck NASA. There will be plenty of 'splaining to do and second guessing if the shuttles are damaged. Of course that is much less important than lives lost.
0 likes   
This space for rent.

quickychick

#8 Postby quickychick » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:08 pm

wrap everything in plastic, sandbag, and pray.


Hopefully they've been given more plastic than my employer gave me: a 2 ft x 2 ft square of visquine to lay ever so gently over my workstation, PC, and printer in case a Cat 4 hits.

Seriously though, good luck to all on the Florida coast.

-qc
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#9 Postby opera ghost » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:09 pm

The shuttles should be okay... think about it. They go much much faster than Francis at launch and probably have some sort of impact shielding- and they should be airtight... right? I mean they are designed to keep out the vaccum of space.

Obviously if a building collapses on them it'd be problematic... but surely they've thought about it :)
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#10 Postby dhweather » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:10 pm

quickychick wrote:
wrap everything in plastic, sandbag, and pray.


Hopefully they've been given more plastic than my employer gave me: a 2 ft x 2 ft square of visquine to lay ever so gently over my workstation, PC, and printer in case a Cat 4 hits.

Seriously though, good luck to all on the Florida coast.

-qc


She speaks the truth.

If a drip of water gets in, she's fine.

If the 125MPH winds get in, it really doesn't matter. :)
0 likes   

chakalakasp

#11 Postby chakalakasp » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:10 pm

dhweather wrote:The shuttles sit on the mammoth movers, getting them up and additional 20-30 feet, and the vehicle buildings are cat 3/4 rated.


The vehicle buildings are rated for 125mph winds max. And that's gusts.

The VAB was built for the Apollo missions, is quite old, and even when it was brand new was only meant to withstand a weak Cat 3. It is not designed to withstand a Cat 4. (The structure is not exactly aerodynamic and is essentially a large concrete gymnasium.) A strong Cat 4, or a Cat 5 (where this seems to be headed) does not bode will for KSC, should it track that way. A direct hit from a Cat 5 would pretty much wipe Kennedy Space Center off the map.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#12 Postby dhweather » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:12 pm

opera ghost wrote:The shuttles should be okay... think about it. They go much much faster than Francis at launch and probably have some sort of impact shielding- and they should be airtight... right? I mean they are designed to keep out the vaccum of space.

Obviously if a building collapses on them it'd be problematic... but surely they've thought about it :)


I wouldn't look at it that way, they have a very laminar airflow around them at launch/landing, and are areodynamically deisgned for specific
forces. Hence a piece of foam punches a whole in a wing.
0 likes   

chakalakasp

#13 Postby chakalakasp » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:18 pm

opera ghost wrote:The shuttles should be okay... think about it. They go much much faster than Francis at launch and probably have some sort of impact shielding- and they should be airtight... right? I mean they are designed to keep out the vaccum of space.


Sure, they're designed to take wind dead-on while flying. So are F-14's. However, F-14s do not take hurricanes very well when parked, which is why the Navy moves them below deck during a hurricane. Winds tend to tip planes over, lift them in the air, blow them around... generally mess them up.

The shuttle is sturdy, but it is not meant to take direct hits from steel beams, concrete bricks, or palm trees flying at 165 mph. Which is exactly what it would probably get, since building integrity would likely be breached, perhaps catastrophically so, in such winds. And, as you mentioned, it's definately not designed to take a 525 foot tall concrete building collapsing on top of it.
0 likes   

User avatar
opera ghost
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 909
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

#14 Postby opera ghost » Wed Sep 01, 2004 10:22 pm

I reapeat- if a building collapses on them it would obviously be problematic.

Trying to be optimistic here... since there's not a lot I can do. I'm worried about the shuttles- I loved watching them when I was a child and the thought that KSC could be gone is one that doesn't settle well in my stomach.

I'd rather hope for the best.
0 likes   

frankthetank
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 527
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: La Crosse, WI

#15 Postby frankthetank » Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:12 pm

While on the subject of very expensive FLORIDA assets...what about the CITRUS regions...aren't they along the East Coast, OKEECHOBEE area??? I thought i heard somewhere that it is a 9 BILLION dollar industry...and that CHarley had already taken out a small portion of it....i hope farmers didn't already plant new trees or anything.... Living in a region dominated by farmers (WISCONSIN) i can just imagine the hardships in the weeks ahead....I wish all of Florida luck and hopefully this doesn't become a routine in Floridas future....

heres a pic from today of the EYE....
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v118/daisybird/franceseye.jpg">

heres the full pic...its a biggie
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gall ... 0.250m.jpg
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hypercane_Kyle and 222 guests