http://www.tormenta.net/frame_page.asp? ... wt20us.htm
This is the 11:30 AM TWO. From upper winds favorable to marginal that is a change.They sound less bullish than in past outlooks and really there is no LLC around to pinpoint in the area.
Recon once again cancelled upper winds are marginal now
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- cycloneye
- Admin

- Posts: 148494
- Age: 69
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Recon once again cancelled upper winds are marginal now
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
-
Anonymous
-
donsutherland1
- S2K Analyst

- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Recon once again cancelled upper winds are marginal now
At this time, I wouldn't be so quick to write off the potential that this area of disturbed weather could become Tropical Depression 17.
Certainly, its last recorded central pressure (1007 MB) would be consistent with a TD, thus not much additional development might be required for it to achieve such a status.
Arguments in favor of its becoming a TD include:
1) Very warm SSTs (above 30C) which are approximately 0.5C to 1.0C above normal for this time of year.
2) Minimal wind shear and a continued decrease in such wind shear.
3) The possible ongoing development of a vorticity center albeit a weak and displaced one (near 19N 83W vs. the disturbance's last reported location at 19N 85W).
Arguments against its becoming a TD:
1) An environment that is not yet fully favorable for development.
2) Close proximity to the Yucatan and western Cuba, along with a slow northwest drift that could bring it closer to the Yucatan.
3) A failure to achieve more rapid development in its present environment (though the possible emergence of a vorticity center might suggest that the disturbance is approaching the point of developing further)
All in all, especially as Kate's development offers a fresh reminder, one should not prematurely write off systems until such time that they show sufficient decay to merit such a position. This is not yet the case with the disturbance in question and its current failure to date to develop is not, in my mind, sufficient to justify its being written off.
To be fair, I don't think TPC is writing off this system, just yet. Still, I don't think one should get the wrong impression that this is the case just because TPC canceled the scheduled reconnaissance flight.
In short, while it is entirely possible that this disturbance may never become TD 17, it is too soon to make this call. On the contrary, there may be new evidence that suggests that it could now moving into a formative stage that could lead to its becoming TD 17.
Certainly, its last recorded central pressure (1007 MB) would be consistent with a TD, thus not much additional development might be required for it to achieve such a status.
Arguments in favor of its becoming a TD include:
1) Very warm SSTs (above 30C) which are approximately 0.5C to 1.0C above normal for this time of year.
2) Minimal wind shear and a continued decrease in such wind shear.
3) The possible ongoing development of a vorticity center albeit a weak and displaced one (near 19N 83W vs. the disturbance's last reported location at 19N 85W).
Arguments against its becoming a TD:
1) An environment that is not yet fully favorable for development.
2) Close proximity to the Yucatan and western Cuba, along with a slow northwest drift that could bring it closer to the Yucatan.
3) A failure to achieve more rapid development in its present environment (though the possible emergence of a vorticity center might suggest that the disturbance is approaching the point of developing further)
All in all, especially as Kate's development offers a fresh reminder, one should not prematurely write off systems until such time that they show sufficient decay to merit such a position. This is not yet the case with the disturbance in question and its current failure to date to develop is not, in my mind, sufficient to justify its being written off.
To be fair, I don't think TPC is writing off this system, just yet. Still, I don't think one should get the wrong impression that this is the case just because TPC canceled the scheduled reconnaissance flight.
In short, while it is entirely possible that this disturbance may never become TD 17, it is too soon to make this call. On the contrary, there may be new evidence that suggests that it could now moving into a formative stage that could lead to its becoming TD 17.
0 likes
-
Anonymous
In short, while it is entirely possible that this disturbance may never become TD 17, it is too soon to make this call. On the contrary, there may be new evidence that suggests that it could now moving into a formative stage that could lead to its becoming TD 17.
Agree 100%. Proximity to land will likely inhibit development over the next few days. But once the low clears the Yucatan things could get interesting in a hurry.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests
