
Try to explain this.
Shì shì shì shì.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:To be fair, I don't think they are using the actual Dvorak scale, but instead a modified version. The intensities do NOT match the actual Dvorak numbers
Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate
Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate
Alyono wrote:which means it is not a true Dvorak
Alyono wrote:That said, Megi was the best looking storm on sat that I have ever seen
Meow wrote:Alyono wrote:The JMA winds in Megi are at least 25 KT too low based upon recon data (even when considering 1 min to 10 min winds). It simply is not accurate
CI8.0 = 122kt = original 170kt
I guess 125kt is the maximum limit of JMA’s scale based on the Koba table. Tip’s 140kt is just converted from 165kt (165*0.88=140.8). Other two 125kt storms from JMA Best Track were born before the Koba table.Alyono wrote:which means it is not a true Dvorak
Currently no agency uses a true Dvorak.
Alyono wrote:They should have used the conversion for Megi as like Tip, Megi had recon data
Meow wrote:supercane4867 wrote:Typhoon Nida and Hurricane Rick in the Previous year just look as impressive if not even better
Yes, they are extremely impressive, but not the most impressive. Based on their looking, they may be 9.9, but not 10.0.
Yellow Evan wrote:What were Monica's Dvorak's? That IMO was as strong as Megi.
supercane4867 wrote:Notice that there're about six tropical cyclones globally had the maximum Dvorak T-number given by an agency
As one of them Hurricane Gilbert was analyzed at T8.0 by NHC itself. So Megi maybe the only Official CI8.0 system, but not the only system received official top Dvorak intensity.
Meow wrote:Please give us a reference.
supercane4867 wrote:Squares that went off the chart correspond to 170kt intensity
Meow wrote:supercane4867 wrote:Squares that went off the chart correspond to 170kt intensity
But it is not ultimately recognized.
Users browsing this forum: ElectricStorm, Lizzytiz1, Stratton23, USTropics and 42 guests