Possible development in the Western Atlantic / GOM (Is Invest 97L)

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#481 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:38 pm

Emmett_Brown wrote:SSTs are VERY warm in the E GOM... widespread area of 30 C and higher. Models depict low shear in the E GOM this weekend as well. It would be nice to get some hurricane models running on this


For NHC to call an invest you would like to have an initialized location.
Big thunderstorm blowing up over Oranjestad island ATM but the wave extends all the way north of Puerto Rico.
any organization is likely to get blown down into the GA islands anyways.
I'm sure they have discussed this..
1 likes   

Stratton23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2513
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2023 10:59 pm
Location: Katy, Tx

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#482 Postby Stratton23 » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:50 pm

12z UKMET is coming in west of New Orleans
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#483 Postby toad strangler » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:52 pm

Stratton23 wrote:12z UKMET is coming in west of New Orleans


And stalling just inland at the end of the run. There is a theme going on here.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#484 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 31, 2024 2:58 pm

weeniepatrol wrote:really really REALLY not a fan of some of these model solutions...


Yeah. Gonna be close. It's going to come down to the ridging north of the system. If it connects or builds over (north of) it, there's no escape route. I can't remember which model started depicting that the other day. It had a TX hit with nowhere to go - think it might have been the GFS that telegraphed the strong high pressure. And again, it's going to be the first week of August, so you figure it's handling the upper setup well compared to the time of year we're in. Well could be the rainiest system of the year if it gets to the USA.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#485 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:06 pm

toad strangler wrote:
Stratton23 wrote:12z UKMET is coming in west of New Orleans


And stalling just inland at the end of the run. There is a theme going on here.


Not to mention that at 90 hours its in the Yucatan channel then spends 48 hours over 30+ degree bathtub water with low shear making its way north around the periphery of the ridge.

But yeah UKMET is tracking the energy that should move through Hispaniola and Cuba.
0 likes   

Keldeo1997
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 637
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:35 pm

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#486 Postby Keldeo1997 » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:30 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#487 Postby chaser1 » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:36 pm

SFLcane wrote:Copy and paste NHC 2PM TWO.

Yeah, that was a bit of a head-scratcher to me. I suppose their attitude is, well now we have the highest extent of model corroboration and not much to do but watch and wait for consolidation. Middle of the week and at least 4 days from any GOM landfall, lie low and monitor
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#488 Postby NDG » Wed Jul 31, 2024 3:39 pm

1 likes   

DunedinDave
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 227
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2023 10:31 am

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#489 Postby DunedinDave » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:11 pm

12 GFS a nightmare for the Florida west coast. Seems like it just sits there and dump rain while possibly sitting offshore and getting stronger. Not sure whether to believe that scenario will play out but it’s got my eyes open a bit in Pinellas County. Hoping it’s just an outlier.
0 likes   

Jelmergraaff
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Age: 22
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:00 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#490 Postby Jelmergraaff » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:24 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
boca wrote:


Which model is that are they new or changed their name to something else.

Euro AI model, and it's been all over the place; discount it for now.


Hey! (first post of the season for me, but I've been reading all along) :wink:

For one of my last courses on atmospheric modelling at uni, I studied the performance of an AI-driven model (PanguWeather) on hurricane Ian, and compared it with ECMWF and two resolutions of WRF. While it is nothing peer-reviewed, I thought it may be useful to share my insights. And maybe this is not the right thread to post this, if so, moderators can gladly move this.

Overall, AI-driven weather models tend to score very well on large-scale patterns on the medium- to long term. This can also enable them to make potentially better track forecasts. While I only studied one AI-driven model and one situation (hurricane Ian), I found much more accurate track forecasts by the AI-driven model compared to ECMWF, or any of the NHC's numerical and statistical models. It's quite difficult to summarize it in a few sentences, but I found an average track error for the forecasts initialized between September 23rd to September 28th of only 138 km (or 75 nm) at +96 hours for PanguWeather, compared to an average error of 248 km (134 nm) for ECMWF. The post-season report of the NHC showed that almost all models had an track error of between 140 and 230 nm for that time range. This is a huge difference at 96 hours ahead. I added both a comparison of the tracks by PanguWeather, ECMWF and WRF (9/27 km) and the absolute track error as images at the end.

And keep in mind that this was on another AI-model, namely PanguWeather rather than the AIFS. However, the skill-scores for upper-level patterns have been consistently higher in favour of the AIFS compared to PanguWeather (and in fact all numerical models). Also, almost all official verifications of AI-models show that they can significantly outperform NWP models in terms of the track forecasts of tropical cyclones. That is why I would suggest not to discard this model whatsoever. And of course, ensembles remain very important (the AIFS also has one since a month or two actually), but at least in terms of operational models I would even prefer the AIFS.

This is the abstract on the small research for a bit more context:

Hurricanes are powerful natural disasters. In September 2022, hurricane Ian struck part of the Atlantic basin, including Cuba, Florida and South Carolina. With the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) driven weather models, this case study compares the performance of these models to classical, numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. The AI-driven model PanguWeather outperforms the NWP-models ECMWF and WRF for track forecasts. It has an average track error of about 230 kilometers at a lead time of 120 hours. ECMWF reaches this error level at a lead time of 90 hours, while WRF already reaches it at 60 to 72 hours ahead. On the other hand, the NWP-models outperform PanguWeather on intensity forecasts, both for the minimum central pressure and the maximum sustained wind speeds. PanguWeather tends to strongly underestimate hurricane Ian’s intensity. ECMWF does best regarding the minimum central pressure, while WRF scores best on most verification statistics for the maximum sustained wind speeds. The physical representation of hurricane Ian at its peak is represented best by the NWP-modelsas well. PanguWeather is much less accurate in showing the key characteristics of a hurricane like a relatively warm core with high wind speeds around it, and the areas with high moisture don’t even make sense from a physical point of view. Overall, the introduction of AI-driven weather models may help to improve the forecasting of tropical cyclones, especially in terms of their future track. However, NWPmodels remain crucial to give an indication of how strong the hurricane will become, and for understanding the physical properties.


11 likes   
21-year old meteorologist and student MSc Climate Studies from The Netherlands. Interested in all fields of meteorology and climatology, including tropical systems like hurricanes.

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2100
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#491 Postby BobHarlem » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:28 pm

Noticing tons of lightning in the area now

Image
2 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#492 Postby Michele B » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:30 pm

MEANINGLESS_NUMBERS wrote:There continues to be some model support for my preferred wishcast: the wave splutters on without significant development and nothing much comes from this at all.


It still doesn't look like much, even while we've watched it for a number of days.

I agree with you, I hope it stays weak.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#493 Postby Michele B » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:36 pm

BobHarlem wrote:
AtlanticWind wrote:The Euro run is concerning for rainfall in Florida moving system slowly across state from the gulf


The general setup for a stall is concerning, crazy rainfall either way, but a stall over water vs land could change the whole dynamic, or center relocations, etc. (See GFS getting to cat 2)

Tidbits flavor of the GFS Total precip (24" scale top)
https://i.imgur.com/WvVogHs.png



I'm in SW FL, and experienced the full fury of Ian in '22.

Sorry, but I'll take 24" of rain over ANY Cat hurricane. Every day of the week.
2 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

IcyTundra
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1205
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2021 9:32 pm
Location: Dickinson, Texas

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#494 Postby IcyTundra » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:44 pm

Michele B wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:
AtlanticWind wrote:The Euro run is concerning for rainfall in Florida moving system slowly across state from the gulf


The general setup for a stall is concerning, crazy rainfall either way, but a stall over water vs land could change the whole dynamic, or center relocations, etc. (See GFS getting to cat 2)

Tidbits flavor of the GFS Total precip (24" scale top)
https://i.imgur.com/WvVogHs.png



I'm in SW FL, and experienced the full fury of Ian in '22.

Sorry, but I'll take 24" of rain over ANY Cat hurricane. Every day of the week.


You don't want much more than that trust me. It rained 55 inches at my house during Harvey.
0 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#495 Postby Michele B » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:45 pm

Jelmergraaff wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
boca wrote:
Which model is that are they new or changed their name to something else.

Euro AI model, and it's been all over the place; discount it for now.


<snip>




This looks very good, Jelmer, and you've defended it well.

I think I'd need a lot more empirical evidence before I follow this AI Model off the cliff, however.

Maybe several years' worth of storm data.
2 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#496 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:48 pm

Jelmergraaff wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
boca wrote:
Which model is that are they new or changed their name to something else.

Euro AI model, and it's been all over the place; discount it for now.


<snip>




Its on topic because of the split in the forecast, probably an asymptote occurring at some of the model variables.
Similar split with Ian forecast after passing near the Isle of Youth.
One if by Land, Two if by Sea?
Not sure about that GFS forecast track to Pensacola.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#497 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:50 pm

Jelmergraaff wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
boca wrote:
Which model is that are they new or changed their name to something else.

Euro AI model, and it's been all over the place; discount it for now.


<snip>

The AI models will be great and should be considered but not discarded unless something is way off. We do see that on the globals where the solution is so unrealistic, you just wait for the next cycle. Thanks for the writeup, good info.
1 likes   

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#498 Postby Michele B » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:54 pm

IcyTundra wrote:
Michele B wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:
The general setup for a stall is concerning, crazy rainfall either way, but a stall over water vs land could change the whole dynamic, or center relocations, etc. (See GFS getting to cat 2)

Tidbits flavor of the GFS Total precip (24" scale top)
https://i.imgur.com/WvVogHs.png



I'm in SW FL, and experienced the full fury of Ian in '22.

Sorry, but I'll take 24" of rain over ANY Cat hurricane. Every day of the week.


You don't want much more than that trust me. It rained 55 inches at my house during Harvey.



I hear ya! But we live in a pretty high area. There was a lot of rain (along with 137 mph for 6 hours!), and we did have flooding in our streets, but it drained pretty quickly, so not really a danger of flooding. Even with 30, 40 or so inches of rain, I think I'd rather face that then the damage Ian did to our home, our neighborhood, neighbors who left and never came back, the few who had so much stress they suffered heart attacks, etc.

Wind, NOT RAIN will hurt us much worse, but I respect your opinion and I'm really sorry for any damage 55" did to your place.


P.S. Hurricanes suck!
2 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

Jelmergraaff
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Age: 22
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:00 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#499 Postby Jelmergraaff » Wed Jul 31, 2024 4:56 pm

Michele B wrote:
Jelmergraaff wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:Euro AI model, and it's been all over the place; discount it for now.


<snip>




This looks very good, Jelmer, and you've defended it well.

I think I'd need a lot more empirical evidence before I follow this AI Model off the cliff, however.

Maybe several years' worth of storm data.


Thanks, it's my pleasure to share it. In the end, AI-driven models won't be a full replacement for NWP-techniques, and even if they were to consistently and significantly outperforming the known weather models such as ECMWF, we still need reanalysis data from models like ECMWF itself to train them well. When I'm making a weather forecast here, you take into account all of the things that you have available. For the longer-term mostly the ensembles, but sometimes also operational runs to give an idea of how a setting could unfold. Over time, you learn to judge models' performances better and better, and you know some model outcomes may be (slightly) more likely than others.

This is also how I work with the AI-driven models. Compared to the differences in skill-scores between ECMWF and GFS for example, but also from my own experiences and judgements over the last year or so, the jump from NWP to AI-driven models is amazing. However, they are not - and will never become - flawless, so you always also have a look at the conventional weather models.

At least it's very encouraging to see how good these already perform on large-scale patterns (but not at all for thunderstorms and wind gusts associated with them for example!) after such a short period of development. And it would be really good from a societal point of view if they can increase the predictability of tropical cyclones, and at least in terms of track forecasts. Now, or in the future. :)
0 likes   
21-year old meteorologist and student MSc Climate Studies from The Netherlands. Interested in all fields of meteorology and climatology, including tropical systems like hurricanes.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: Possible development in the Western Atlantic (0/60)

#500 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Jul 31, 2024 5:00 pm

Jelmergraaff wrote:
Michele B wrote:
Jelmergraaff wrote:
<snip>



This looks very good, Jelmer, and you've defended it well.

I think I'd need a lot more empirical evidence before I follow this AI Model off the cliff, however.

Maybe several years' worth of storm data.


Thanks, it's my pleasure to share it. In the end, AI-driven models won't be a full replacement for NWP-techniques, and even if they were to consistently and significantly outperforming the known weather models such as ECMWF, we still need reanalysis data from models like ECMWF itself to train them well. When I'm making a weather forecast here, you take into account all of the things that you have available. For the longer-term mostly the ensembles, but sometimes also operational runs to give an idea of how a setting could unfold. Over time, you learn to judge models' performances better and better, and you know some model outcomes may be (slightly) more likely than others.

This is also how I work with the AI-driven models. Compared to the differences in skill-scores between ECMWF and GFS for example, but also from my own experiences and judgements over the last year or so, the jump from NWP to AI-driven models is amazing. However, they are not - and will never become - flawless, so you always also have a look at the conventional weather models.

At least it's very encouraging to see how good these already perform on large-scale patterns (but not at all for thunderstorms and wind gusts associated with them for example!) after such a short period of development. And it would be really good from a societal point of view if they can increase the predictability of tropical cyclones, and at least in terms of track forecasts. Now, or in the future. :)
In the final analysis, the best forecast is the NHC, they get to mash it all up,throw out the gabage and make a track. If the euro takes a loss, its going to make a tough start even worse.
1 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hypercane_Kyle, RomP and 17 guests