Intersting Info from Slidell...

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

#21 Postby timNms » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:19 pm

vbhoutex wrote:People, people, people, why do we continue to try to second guess /argue something we were not there to witness? How many times do we/I have to say it. Just because and area was not devastated/totally wiped off the map doesn't mean the aforementioned winds did not happen. Winds are very capricious. They can occur on one block and not the next and we are talking a difference of possibly 30 mph difference or more and that makes a huge difference in damage at that level of wind. I don't know if those winds occurred or not-it is not for me to judge. But I am willing to consider the fact that it was possible since there was at least one report of it that at least initially appeared official-NOT ONE OF THOSE OFFICIALS WOULD GAIN ANYTHING BY MAKING THIS UP!!! Winds in a hurricane DO NOT NECESSARILY OCCUR OVER A LARGE AREA, BUT RATHER IN BURSTS IN SMALL AREAS OF THE HEAVIER STORMS WITHIN THE EYEWALL AND NEARBY. That is why it is possible that this happened. Unfortunately we will never be able to prove it since we do not have indestructible anemometers every block or so along the coast and 50 miles inland.


VB, this is quite possibly the most intelligent post I've read on this subject in quite a while. My hat's off to you.
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#22 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:24 pm

Im sorry I wasnt trying to upset anyone here. I know it was a horrible year for all of you on the gulf coast.


George nothing at all was aimed your way, and I'm sure you didn't "upset" anyone. Mine was only a generalized statement. I know how much the area means to you, and your feelings for it.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

#23 Postby timNms » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:24 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:It was infact a full force cat5 no more then 6 hours before landfall.


And beginning about 4 hours after landfall and coninuing for what seemed like an eternity, she was a....what's a nice clean word to use instead of the "B" word that keeps coming to mind??? :D....at my house! As bad as she was here, I wouldn't want to go through what those along the coast went through...cat 2, cat3, cat4, cat5 or whatever she was.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#24 Postby MGC » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:34 pm

Granted, I have not been all over Slidell, but from what I have seen in numerous trips to Slidell I have not noticed any wind damage that would correlate to Cat-5. I was over in Slidell perhaps a month after the hurricane. I may not be an expert, but I have have the oppertunity to witness the damage of an many a intense hurricane since 1964. If someone could direct me to the Cat-5 damage in Slidell I'd drive over tomorrow to look at it. I'm not downplaying katrina, living through this has been hell, but I'm just giving my opinion from what I have observed. Had Slidell gone through the eyewall of a Cat-5 there would be a whole lot less of Slidell around today......MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 76
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#25 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:47 pm

MGC wrote:Granted, I have not been all over Slidell, but from what I have seen in numerous trips to Slidell I have not noticed any wind damage that would correlate to Cat-5. I was over in Slidell perhaps a month after the hurricane. I may not be an expert, but I have have the oppertunity to witness the damage of an many a intense hurricane since 1964. If someone could direct me to the Cat-5 damage in Slidell I'd drive over tomorrow to look at it. I'm not downplaying katrina, living through this has been hell, but I'm just giving my opinion from what I have observed. Had Slidell gone through the eyewall of a Cat-5 there would be a whole lot less of Slidell around today......MGC


I don't think anyone is saying Slidell, (or anywhere else for that matter) went through anything like Cat 5 conditions (sustained). Most observations were on whether or not there might have been gusts, or microbursts in that range, which is entirely possible. I really don't know, and it matters little to those whose homes were nonetheless a shambles. She was quite bad enough as she was.. frankly I wish she would have been just a nice TS.--or less! --But she was much more than that!

A2K
0 likes   

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

#26 Postby timNms » Sun Jun 04, 2006 4:52 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#27 Postby TSmith274 » Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:56 pm

I hate to post this, but I know that an oil rig weather station around Buras, La. charted a max wind gust of 206 for about 10 seconds. I've seen the graph, and I can only speculate that it may have been a tornado. Wind speeds in the 165-170mph range was common, however. Were the instruments malfunctioning? I don't know. Don't shoot the messenger!
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#28 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:16 pm

timNms wrote:http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/Katrina/WindSpeedMap/

Found the map I mentioned.
wow! nice find. This is a good map for the top gusts experienced from Katrina. It is amazing to see gusts as high as 80mph well over 200 miles inland!
0 likes   

User avatar
benny
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:09 am
Location: Miami

#29 Postby benny » Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:20 pm

TSmith274 wrote:I hate to post this, but I know that an oil rig weather station around Buras, La. charted a max wind gust of 206 for about 10 seconds. I've seen the graph, and I can only speculate that it may have been a tornado. Wind speeds in the 165-170mph range was common, however. Were the instruments malfunctioning? I don't know. Don't shoot the messenger!


what's the source of that data? i haven't seen that before. does any official agency know about it?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#30 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jun 04, 2006 9:23 pm

also, what type of anamometer was used for that recording

I it was a hot wire anamometer, one must remember that those are prone to error during heavy rains. One produced a wind gust to 172 m.p.h. in Georges and a 205KT gust during Typhoon Paka
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#31 Postby HollynLA » Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:31 pm

I have to agree with the previous poster, it does seem that we will eventually hear that Katrina was a depression at landfall, and it's getting rather old. I believe it's already down to a cat 2, who knows what's coming next. Maybe we were all dreaming the whole thing and it never actually happened? :roll:
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#32 Postby rtd2 » Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:48 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:It was infact a full force cat5 no more then 6 hours before landfall.



So true and that in itself was a contributing factor causse those cat 5 winds and pressure created a Cat 5 surge that indeed made landfall as such and along the shoreline in miss. to nearly 2 miles inland it wouldnt have made a difference if the winds were cat 1 cause that area was wiped out by a cat 5 surge!
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#33 Postby rtd2 » Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:52 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:also, what type of anamometer was used for that recording

I it was a hot wire anamometer, one must remember that those are prone to error during heavy rains. One produced a wind gust to 172 m.p.h. in Georges and a 205KT gust during Typhoon Paka




Remember that reported Georges Gust too...Wlox repoted it live on air and to this day some local believe it was true...Again All I NEVER intended to start a wind debate in thus thread but there has been some great info. added...Thanks for the windspeed map timNms
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#34 Postby rtd2 » Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:57 pm

HollynLA wrote:I have to agree with the previous poster, it does seem that we will eventually hear that Katrina was a depression at landfall, and it's getting rather old. I believe it's already down to a cat 2, who knows what's coming next. Maybe we were all dreaming the whole thing and it never actually happened? :roll:




I just wonder if the AFTERMATH in NOLA had ANYTHING AT ALL to do with Katrina's Downsize? I mean we kept hearing how bad it was in NOLA and trust me I realizre it was but could it be that we as TROPICAL Weather followers realize NOLA didnt get a Worse case sceneriao and it CAN be worse given the right conditions yet the media protrayed this as the Nightmare storm always predicted for NOLA...Maybe just maybe the nhc/media downplayed katrinas effects in efforts to help survivors who may think I survived Katrina I can survive anything not feel that way and realize Nola didnt get it as bad as it could (dont think it could get antworse in Miss.) maybe taking away from Katrina can somehow save lives in the future? I realize Weather forecaters duty is to educate and prevent lose of life and I respect that duty!
Last edited by rtd2 on Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#35 Postby TSmith274 » Sun Jun 04, 2006 11:52 pm

benny wrote:
TSmith274 wrote:I hate to post this, but I know that an oil rig weather station around Buras, La. charted a max wind gust of 206 for about 10 seconds. I've seen the graph, and I can only speculate that it may have been a tornado. Wind speeds in the 165-170mph range was common, however. Were the instruments malfunctioning? I don't know. Don't shoot the messenger!


what's the source of that data? i haven't seen that before. does any official agency know about it?


I'm going to get the plant manager's name and phone number. I think it would be good for one of you mets out there to contact him and get him to fax you the record. I'll be down there in a few days. I'll get his info and post it on here or PM someone about it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sean in New Orleans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 7:26 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA 30.0N 90.0W
Contact:

#36 Postby Sean in New Orleans » Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:12 am

timNms wrote:http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/Katrina/WindSpeedMap/

Found the map I mentioned.

This map looks about right, IMO. We clocked a gust to 141mph in the Quarter at the worst of it all, and for over 5 hours had gusts to over 100mph. This was about a block from Jackson Square. It was sustained in the Quarter around 115mph to 120mph for the peak hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#37 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jun 05, 2006 7:20 am

Sean in New Orleans wrote:
timNms wrote:http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/Katrina/WindSpeedMap/

Found the map I mentioned.

This map looks about right, IMO. We clocked a gust to 141mph in the Quarter at the worst of it all, and for over 5 hours had gusts to over 100mph. This was about a block from Jackson Square. It was sustained in the Quarter around 115mph to 120mph for the peak hour.
who clocked that (and with what equipment)? There is no official report of wind speeds that high in the New Orleans area. The map that was posted also only shows 100-130mph gusts in that area.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#38 Postby Ixolib » Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:10 am

timNms wrote:http://www.ncddc.noaa.gov/Katrina/WindSpeedMap/

Found the map I mentioned.


**I wonder how the map knew to change its wind speeds exactly at the county lines? For instance, in Stone County, the winds were 128 but in George County they were only 98 - and amazingly, the county boarder is exactly where the change occurred.
.....**Sorry, just a little humor on the map :D .

But I do believe those are estimations based primarily on the storm's track and structure rather than on bonafide measured speeds at each and every location depicted.....
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#39 Postby HollynLA » Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:14 am

I'm not so sure how accurate that map is either. In Katrina, we lost part of our roof. siding completely ripped off the house and blown down the road, lost trees, front door blew open, neighbors roofs were twisted up and landed in their front yard (metal roof), power lines laying everywhere, seen some small buildings torn down, etc. and the map says our highest "gusts" were in the 60's. Hmmmm?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#40 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:19 am

HollynLA wrote:I'm not so sure how accurate that map is either. In Katrina, we lost part of our roof. siding completely ripped off the house and blown down the road, lost trees, front door blew open, neighbors roofs were twisted up and landed in their front yard (metal roof), power lines laying everywhere, seen some small buildings torn down, etc. and the map says our highest "gusts" were in the 60's. Hmmmm?
could your area have been hit by a tornado or microburst?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests