WeatherBoy2000 wrote:
Many people thought Beryl was confirmation that a truly hyperactive season was on the way due to 2005/1933 being the only comparable analogs in that set up. Now it is September 6th, no storm has formed since the 12th of August and it's unlikely a storm will form before the 10th. 2024 has shown that current activity is not necessarily a good predictor of future activity, this could prove itself true again due to agencies like CSU still predicting an active back end despite what's going on now.
I remember hearing those discussions and remember being skeptical that one strong storm forming as early as Beryl did was somehow confirmation that the entire season was going to be a blockbuster. Seemed a bit unfounded at the time.