Will Emily be a cat 5 at the 5 PM advisorie?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

Will Emily be cat 5 at 5 PM?

Yes
46
65%
No
25
35%
 
Total votes: 71

Message
Author
mike18xx

#21 Postby mike18xx » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:09 pm

AL Chili Pepper wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Its looks very good now...It looks as good as Ivan.
The core of Emily is very impressive (maybe as much as Ivan), but Ivan's outflow was perfect. http://www.redtailcanyon.com/items/381293.aspx?imageId=219018 There doesn't seem to be much shear around Emily, so she still might make it.
IMO, the shear is still there, it's just hidden beneath the high-altitude veil of the CDO's exhaust. Regardless of that, I assert that Emily, like Mitch (a west-CAR cat-5 in a sheared environment) before her, is now so strong that the inner core is basically unaffected by shear of this level. Already, accessory cells can be seen orbiting under the edge periphery of the CDO, and their blow-off is always outward, so the exhaust is overshooting the highest altitude of the shear, shunting it down into lower levels, where its only effect is to determine arrangement of outrigger feeder convection.
0 likes   

mike18xx

#22 Postby mike18xx » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:16 pm

hurricanefreak1988 wrote:She's been going wild all of a sudden. Heck, in my opinion, it would be a surprise if she doesn't become the first Category 5 of the season at 5PM.
Here: http://www.weathermatrix.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1724&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75, I inquired, two days ago, for reasons why Emily could not become a cat-5, given that, climatology, storms of her intensity (at that time) following her projected track invariably achieved cat-5 status in the Caribbean. Even as early as the 12th, I could smell it coming.

And, as warm as the northwest Atlantic is, we could see an Isabel-like cat-5 out there as well later in the season.
0 likes   

mike18xx

#23 Postby mike18xx » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:20 pm

stormie_skies wrote:5 pm would be the time to do it....assuming Miss Em doesnt start weakening or start a EWRC....
The 12-15 mile-wide eye with "stadium seating" is a pretty stable entity; I don't see any more EWRCs happening in Emily prior to maxing out in the same general vacinity in which Gilbert set his records.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#24 Postby dhweather » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:22 pm

No - until recon gets back in there, they won't do it.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38266
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#25 Postby Brent » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:24 pm

jkt21787 wrote:Since recon won't be back until this evening, I say no. They won't upgrade without recon in there, I would imagine.


If the satellite imagery looks better... I think they will. It was so close at 2pm that ANY intensification on satellite would be a 5.

What are the satellite estimates BTW???
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148501
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#26 Postby cycloneye » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:25 pm

Brent wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:Since recon won't be back until this evening, I say no. They won't upgrade without recon in there, I would imagine.


If the satellite imagery looks better... I think they will. It was so close at 2pm that ANY intensification on satellite would be a 5.

What are the satellite estimates BTW???


16/1745 UTC 16.5N 78.0W T6.5/6.5 EMILY -- Atlantic Ocean


Shy from 5.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#27 Postby jkt21787 » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:26 pm

cycloneye wrote:
Brent wrote:
jkt21787 wrote:Since recon won't be back until this evening, I say no. They won't upgrade without recon in there, I would imagine.


If the satellite imagery looks better... I think they will. It was so close at 2pm that ANY intensification on satellite would be a 5.

What are the satellite estimates BTW???


16/1745 UTC 16.5N 78.0W T6.5/6.5 EMILY -- Atlantic Ocean


Shy from 5.

Yeah, and there won't be another update on that until after the 5 pm advisory, so 155 will most likely hold.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#28 Postby HurricaneBill » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:28 pm

I don't think they'll upgrade her without recon. However, if satellite estimates support it, they might. They did upgrade Isabel to Cat 5 based on satellite intensities.

I think they're waiting to see if the pressure drops further.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#29 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:28 pm

This storm has gotten stronger. The latest frams of the IR shows that the red has built all the way around the eye again. In the storm is tighting fast. Outflow is shooting out of the northeast like crazy. In the buzz saw is becoming better defined. There is no quastion that she has gotten stronger since 2pm.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

#30 Postby clfenwi » Sat Jul 16, 2005 2:45 pm

On the past two days, NHC has adjusted the intensity without current recon observations, once a 5 mph nudge down, the other 5 mph up... unless they see indications to the contrary on satellite, I would think they could infer that the pressure fall is continuing at the 1.5 mb per hour rate...trim that a little to be conservative and you get 934 millibars at 5 PM...do you bump the wind 5mph on that (without the observations to back it up like you did last time (145->150)? If the satellite imagery at 4:30 doesn't show a weakening/eye-wall replacement cycle starting up, then maybe...tough call, that's why the get paid the big bucks :wink:
0 likes   

mike18xx

#31 Postby mike18xx » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:14 pm

dhweather wrote:No - until recon gets back in there, they won't do it.
If Emily acquires an "off-scale cold" IR doughnut signature, they might; what's interesting is her strength already with less-than basement-level cloud-top temps. Methinks she'll bomb during the over-night diurnal maximum....
0 likes   

Shoshana
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1414
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:50 pm
Location: NE Austin

#32 Postby Shoshana » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:49 pm

5 pm Advisory is out

Repeating the 5 PM EDT position...16.8 N... 78.8 W. Movement
toward...west-northwest near 18 mph. Maximum sustained
winds...155 mph. Minimum central pressure... 937 mb.


'shana
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#33 Postby jkt21787 » Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:00 pm

Not surprised at all it was kept at a 4. People don't understand that the mind thinks something different when hearing "category 5", even though its just 1 mph. NHC doesn't want to upgrade it w/o recon info or satelitte intensity saying it is, then only to have recon go back in a few hours and find out it isn't a 5 at all.

If they find a 5 during the recon soon, they will upgrade it for the 8 pm and most certainly the 11 pm advisory.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests