Possible Tropical Threat to Louisiana

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#21 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Oct 10, 2004 8:48 am

Earlier, I had noted:


1) Tropical Storm Matthew is well east of the position I had noted earlier.
2) The easterly motion indicates that Louisiana is all but certainly in the clear.


This error of judgment was corrected in subsequent posts in which a track was outlined. As stated in yesterday's discussion, I had explained the impact of the reported eastward movement that created a bias too far to the east.

Nevertheless, I greatly regret this error, which spoiled the synoptic idea (which was quite good) and the later reasonable track ideas, both of which indicated Louisiana landfalls.

I just wanted it to be clear that I am reviewing all my posts on Matthew, as I do with every tropical storm/hurricane to see what went right and what went wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

#22 Postby Ixolib » Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:04 am

donsutherland1 wrote:Earlier, I had noted:


1) Tropical Storm Matthew is well east of the position I had noted earlier.
2) The easterly motion indicates that Louisiana is all but certainly in the clear.


This error of judgment was corrected in subsequent posts in which a track was outlined. As stated in yesterday's discussion, I had explained the impact of the reported eastward movement that created a bias too far to the east.

Nevertheless, I greatly regret this error, which spoiled the synoptic idea (which was quite good) and the later reasonable track ideas, both of which indicated Louisiana landfalls.

I just wanted it to be clear that I am reviewing all my posts on Matthew, as I do with every tropical storm/hurricane to see what went right and what went wrong.


Don - Been watching your stuff for a while now and the info you provide is not only educational, but informative. And I appreciate your gracious manner - it certainly serves as a great example for others to follow!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9628
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#23 Postby Steve » Sun Oct 10, 2004 10:06 am

I agree with Ixolib. Don is one of the better forecasters around the web. It's easy for anyone to talk a good game or to criticize something in hindsight, but when someone puts their neck on the line with actual forecasts (including coordinates) and gives reasoning, you have to respect that.

Steve
0 likes   

Rainband

#24 Postby Rainband » Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:12 am

I agree as well. Awesome!! :wink:
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#25 Postby donsutherland1 » Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:00 pm

Thanks, Ixolib, Steve,and Rainsform for the very kind words.

I generally try to assess my performance in as objective a fashion as possible so as to identify errors and try to learn from them.

Best wishes.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Noots and 591 guests