camille and ivan

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Indystorm
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Kentland Indiana

camille and ivan

#1 Postby Indystorm » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:30 pm

What would be the effects in NOLA if Ivan took a track to the mouth of the Mississippi and then to Pass Christian for landfall as did Camille? Ivan is now Cat 5. Camille was a 5. Are they comparable in size with hurricane and tropical storm winds? I know a hurricane passing just east of NOLA is part of the doomsday scenario to spill Lake Pontchartrain waters into the city, but what happened in New Orleans when Camille hit Pass Christian?
Can we use that as a guide?
0 likes   

User avatar
bahamaswx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:11 am
Location: Georgetown, Bahamas

#2 Postby bahamaswx » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:33 pm

Ivan is far larger than Camille. With a pressure of 906mb, there's no way he would support the 195mph sustained winds Camille had.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: camille and ivan

#3 Postby Ixolib » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:33 pm

Indystorm wrote:What would be the effects in NOLA if Ivan took a track to the mouth of the Mississippi and then to Pass Christian for landfall as did Camille? Ivan is now Cat 5. Camille was a 5. Are they comparable in size with hurricane and tropical storm winds? I know a hurricane passing just east of NOLA is part of the doomsday scenario to spill Lake Pontchartrain waters into the city, but what happened in New Orleans when Camille hit Pass Christian?
Can we use that as a guide?


I believe it has to do with the approach. From the SE is what I hear is the worst case. If from the SW, although it will be significant, the impact would not be as severe - even if it crossed the "X" at the same spot.
0 likes   

User avatar
FritzPaul
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 468
Age: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: Pensacola, FL
Contact:

#4 Postby FritzPaul » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:34 pm

Cat 5 coming within 50 miles of NO in any direction would wipe out the city.

Coastal erosion has made a dangerous situation even more so.

When IZZY came 2 years ago, he caused major flooding and he was only a TS.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: camille and ivan

#5 Postby Ixolib » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:50 pm

Indystorm wrote:What would be the effects in NOLA if Ivan took a track to the mouth of the Mississippi and then to Pass Christian for landfall as did Camille? Ivan is now Cat 5. Camille was a 5. Are they comparable in size with hurricane and tropical storm winds? I know a hurricane passing just east of NOLA is part of the doomsday scenario to spill Lake Pontchartrain waters into the city, but what happened in New Orleans when Camille hit Pass Christian?
Can we use that as a guide?


I believe it has to do with the approach. From the SE is what I hear is the worst case. If from the SW, although it will be significant, the impact would not be as severe - even if it crossed the "X" at the same spot.
0 likes   

wabbitoid
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Contact:

#6 Postby wabbitoid » Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:26 pm

Fritz, you are correct. A strike around Biloxi would push the tidal surge into Ponchatrain, and the winds from the north would push all of that over the levee. A direct hit has only about 40 miles of land to wash over before it is filling "the bowl".

They re-evaluated this a few years ago, and decided that there are a lot of situations for NO to be in serious trouble than just a big 'cane up the Mississippi.

It's not good to be ten feet below sea level, basically.
0 likes   

User avatar
Mattie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 7:44 pm
Location: North Texas (formerly South Louisiana)
Contact:

#7 Postby Mattie » Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:40 pm

Anything above a 3 is catastrophic for New Orleans/Mouth of Mississippi. The levees are only 8 ft and many people live out side of the levee protection. It would pushed the water over the levees and then it would have no where to run to - so in effect it becomes just standing water.
0 likes   

wabbitoid
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Contact:

#8 Postby wabbitoid » Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:52 pm

Should we start a new thread about the nightmare possibility in New Orleans, just so people know why some of us are so panicky?

Basically, it comes down to this:

New Orleans is a marsh. The land was built up by sediment from the Mississippi. This land compacts each year, and then is flooded by more sediment -- or, rather, it was until about 150 years ago.

Since then, the area has been ringed with a jury-rigged series of levees that channel the Mississippi into a narrow canal. That has pushed all the sediment way into the gulf, and all of the bayous south of New Orleans have been starved for new fill. An area the size of Manhatten is lost to the Gulf each year.

In addition, New Orleans has continued to sink, with no new fill on top, and is now 10 feet below sea level (more in places). And all this time the loss of bayou to the south moves it closer to the Gulf -- the bowl that is below sea level is 40 miles or less from the Gulf.

All of this is protected by old, 8 foot levees that can easily be breached by a major hurricane.

The net result could well be the permanant loss of New Orleans (it would be underwater), and loss of life between 40k and 100k people.

In addition, 20% of our nation's refining capability is in Lake Charles, Shreveport, or Baton Rouge. The largest importation of oil is at Grand Isle. The Mississippi would likely be rendered impassable for a while, meaning all or part of this would be messed up, as would 80% of our nations grain shipments.

In short, a direct strike on New Orleans or Biloxi would be your very worst possible nightmare come true.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests