From MIA discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
From MIA discussion
THE AVN TRIES TO FORECAST A LOW DEVELOPMENT JUST NORTH OF THE
YUCATAN LATER SUNDAY AND MOVES IT NORTH TO THE WESTERN PENINSULA BY
MONDAY EVENING. WILL NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON THIS IF THE TRACK
CHANGES.
YUCATAN LATER SUNDAY AND MOVES IT NORTH TO THE WESTERN PENINSULA BY
MONDAY EVENING. WILL NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON THIS IF THE TRACK
CHANGES.
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5

- Posts: 5280
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Hmm, how do you get to the western peninsula after moving north of the Yucatan? Anyways I have no idea where this might go but if I had to guess I'd say middle Texas coast-panhandle of Florida. Also we must still pay close attention to this system even though it's very early in the season. Take a look back at hurricane Audrey if you think you can't have big hurricanes in the gulf in June
.
0 likes
NW Florida penisula
Trying to get some needed rainfall for all you Floridians
Weve had enough rain in Texas.
Here is the AVN plots
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/3d/avn_pres_3d.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/3e/avn_pres_3e.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/4d/avn_pres_4d.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/4e/avn_pres_4e.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/5d/avn_pres_5d.html
Weve had enough rain in Texas.
Here is the AVN plots
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/3d/avn_pres_3d.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/3e/avn_pres_3e.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/4d/avn_pres_4d.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/4e/avn_pres_4e.html
http://weather.unisys.com/aviation/5d/avn_pres_5d.html
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
Dean4Storms
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Right now the GFS is putting it more toward the Appalachicola Bay area ot the Big Bend area of FL.
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/loop.avnpcp.html
http://weather.cod.edu/forecast/loop.avnpcp.html
0 likes
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
GalvestonDuck
- Category 5

- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
Okay, now for my stupid question of the year --
Why is it symbolized with an "H"? I thought these were low pressure systems. Low pressure = rainy, wet weather; high pressure = dry, hot weather. Don't we watch the barometer drop during tropical development?
Is it registering high pressure at a different atmospheric level (higher up) even though the storm system has low pressure, and that's why it's symbolized with an "H"?
I know I'm looking at the forecast model track and I see where I'm watching it go. Just never quite got the H instead of L.
Thanks! Now, I'll just go back to my amateur watching and waiting and praying this season goes by without a major one making landfall.
Why is it symbolized with an "H"? I thought these were low pressure systems. Low pressure = rainy, wet weather; high pressure = dry, hot weather. Don't we watch the barometer drop during tropical development?
Is it registering high pressure at a different atmospheric level (higher up) even though the storm system has low pressure, and that's why it's symbolized with an "H"?
I know I'm looking at the forecast model track and I see where I'm watching it go. Just never quite got the H instead of L.
Thanks! Now, I'll just go back to my amateur watching and waiting and praying this season goes by without a major one making landfall.
0 likes
- Stormsfury
- Category 5

- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
GalvestonDuck wrote:Okay, now for my stupid question of the year --
Why is it symbolized with an "H"? I thought these were low pressure systems. Low pressure = rainy, wet weather; high pressure = dry, hot weather. Don't we watch the barometer drop during tropical development?
Is it registering high pressure at a different atmospheric level (higher up) even though the storm system has low pressure, and that's why it's symbolized with an "H"?
I know I'm looking at the forecast model track and I see where I'm watching it go. Just never quite got the H instead of L.
Thanks! Now, I'll just go back to my amateur watching and waiting and praying this season goes by without a major one making landfall.
Shawn, that's actually a good question ... the H's that you see are precipitation maximas on the NWP outputs (and shows the maximum QPF - or precip forecast: QPF stands for Quantitive Precipitation Forecast)
This is TIME SENSITIVE ...
On the imagery below, notice the H within the red area off the West Coast of Florida with a 1.61" on it...the model output is forecasting 1.61" in a 12 hour period...

0 likes
-
GalvestonDuck
- Category 5

- Posts: 15941
- Age: 57
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
- Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)
-
ColdFront77
Vortex wrote:THE AVN TRIES TO FORECAST A LOW DEVELOPMENT JUST NORTH OF THE
YUCATAN LATER SUNDAY AND MOVES IT NORTH TO THE WESTERN PENINSULA BY
MONDAY EVENING. WILL NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON THIS IF THE TRACK
CHANGES.
newt3 wrote:Western penisula? Are you talking about Penisula of Florida? I live in the Panhandle. Getting interesting to say the least.
wxman57 wrote:He meant western PANHANDLE, not peninsula.
So, my explanation yesterday and in the last ten minutes about the flow around the high in the Gulf bringing in the southwest flow makes no sense. The statement Vortex posted above makes more sense. Apparently it doesn't.
See why I am reluctant to take part in the discussions here. I get the feeling that I am going to be "chewed out" with my probably redundant opinions that SEEM one sided.
0 likes
-
Josephine96
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests





