blp wrote:12z UKMET is stronger. The models look to be in general agreement on some type of development. Let's see if it continues.
What website do people get the UKMET plots from?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
blp wrote:12z UKMET is stronger. The models look to be in general agreement on some type of development. Let's see if it continues.
Siker wrote:blp wrote:12z UKMET is stronger. The models look to be in general agreement on some type of development. Let's see if it continues.
What website do people get the UKMET plots from?
Hammy wrote:Siker wrote:blp wrote:12z UKMET is stronger. The models look to be in general agreement on some type of development. Let's see if it continues.
What website do people get the UKMET plots from?
http://ruc.noaa.gov/hfip/tcgen/
gatorcane wrote:Here is how the ECMWF run ends at 240 hours. Looking at the 500MB height forecast from the model (second image), there is a lot or ridging building in over the Western Atlantic and Eastern North America allowing the low to move W or WNW even if it were to deepen and develop into something more significant. The question is - would there be more favorable conditions downstream further west (say if it got into the area just north of the Leeward islands / Puerto Rico / Hispaniola)?
AJC3 wrote:gatorcane wrote:Here is how the ECMWF run ends at 240 hours. Looking at the 500MB height forecast from the model (second image), there is a lot or ridging building in over the Western Atlantic and Eastern North America allowing the low to move W or WNW even if it were to deepen and develop into something more significant. The question is - would there be more favorable conditions downstream further west (say if it got into the area just north of the Leeward islands / Puerto Rico / Hispaniola)?
http://i.imgur.com/mxveKMl.gif
http://i.imgur.com/fAK7lLU.png
One thing you can do to help answer your own question, at least in terms of upper tropospheric winds/shear, is post the 250MB progs from the same time frame.