Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#1 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:54 am

It will NOT happen. There is no way there can be two typhoons as close as they currently are forecast to be in 5 days.

What is more likely to happen is that the two depressions will MERGE into a single typhoon. However, unless the track error is extremely high, there will not be two of them
0 likes   

Meow

#2 Postby Meow » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:13 am

I guess you have not read the prognostic reasoning from JTWC. It says that 12W and 13W will merge into a single system and intensify into a typhoon.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re:

#3 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:22 am

Meow wrote:I guess you have not read the prognostic reasoning from JTWC. It says that 12W and 13W will merge into a single system and intensify into a typhoon.


then why are the 120 hour positions separate?

http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/R ... wp1213.gif
north of Taipei

http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/R ... wp1313.gif
east of Taipei

their reasoning does not match their forecast
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#4 Postby wxman57 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:31 am

Yes, very strange. If you're forecasting two systems to merge in a few days you don't forecast each to be a separate typhoon at day 5. Their TS force wind fields would be mixed together.
0 likes   

Meow

Re: Re:

#5 Postby Meow » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:48 am

Alyono wrote:then why are the 120 hour positions separate?

http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/R ... wp1213.gif
north of Taipei

http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/R ... wp1313.gif
east of Taipei

their reasoning does not match their forecast

I don’t care about JTWC. They often do mistakes.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#6 Postby euro6208 » Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:49 am

really interesting development for both systems...
0 likes   

vrif
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:51 pm

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#7 Postby vrif » Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:49 pm

JTWC's merger is only a couple of nautical miles away from each other. Close enough for me to count as a merger.
Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#8 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:12 pm

there is still a timing mismatch. There is only a 96 hour position for Depression 13W. However, its 96 hour position is not is the same place as is the 96 hour position for Depression 12W
0 likes   

vrif
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:51 pm

Re:

#9 Postby vrif » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:27 pm

Alyono wrote:there is still a timing mismatch. There is only a 96 hour position for Depression 13W. However, its 96 hour position is not is the same place as is the 96 hour position for Depression 12W


Good point. Sounds like JTWC is over estimating the strength of at least one of the systems.
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#10 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:57 pm

This is a really annoying problem with JTWC. I wonder why they can't just keep the two systems separate?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#11 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:04 pm

and now, despite every single dynamical model showing a large typhoon, they go with a TS... Even the GFS raw output has winds near typhoon force

trying to understand the forecast logic
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#12 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:07 pm

Shoot me a PM if you figure it out because I would REALLY like to know why they backed it down. Forecast rationale seems sloppy.

Alyono wrote:and now, despite every single dynamical model showing a large typhoon, they go with a TS... Even the GFS raw output has winds near typhoon force

trying to understand the forecast logic
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#13 Postby HURAKAN » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:09 pm

Image

they just issued last advisory on TD 13W .
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#14 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Sat Aug 17, 2013 7:54 pm

Yes I was noticed this too and was wondering what the heck was going on, very strange. Regarding intensity all the recent model runs I've seen for 12W suggest it will become a typhoon!
0 likes   
James - Documenting tropical cyclones...

http://www.youtube.com/TyphoonHunter

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#15 Postby dexterlabio » Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:09 pm

They should've just shown the other system dissipated or absorbed or something like that...first of all, it's quite confusing when you first see a dissipating TD becoming a Cat1 typhoon in less than 6 hours.. also the time and the spot where they expect the weaker system to merge with the other system just don't come together... I recall the same situation with TY Parma and TD 19W in 2009. .
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

vrif
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:51 pm

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#16 Postby vrif » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:19 pm

Looking at the latest 00Z GFS run. The runs are showing a broader and broader circulation for Trami. This trend is see-able from the 12Z -> 18Z -> 00Z runs. This could be a reason why the intensity forecast from JTWC and JMA has been lower than expected.
0 likes   

vrif
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:51 pm

Re: Note about the JTWC forecasts!!!!

#17 Postby vrif » Sun Aug 18, 2013 2:34 pm

Looks like the models changed again regarding intensity. Now it is picking up Trami to have a good closed circulation
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cdenton12, Google [Bot] and 58 guests