1914= one storm?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

1914= one storm?

#1 Postby hurricanetrack » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:02 am

I know that we did not have recon and satellite data, but 1914 really had only one storm? Wow. That was apparently also around a pretty deep solar output minimum if I understand correctly. Either way, one is an awfully low number.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:11 am

In the re-analysis nothing was found in 1914 to indicate the presence of another storm or storms. One is possible, we saw only four in 1983, but it's also very possible that there were one or two more that were not intercepted by any ships or didn't make landfall.
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: 1914= one storm?

#3 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:12 am

hurricanetrack wrote:I know that we did not have recon and satellite data, but 1914 really had only one storm? Wow. That was apparently also around a pretty deep solar output minimum if I understand correctly. Either way, one is an awfully low number.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atl ... index.html


I wonder if the onset of WW 1 that Summer promoted radio silence from ships at sea.
0 likes   

User avatar
hurricanetrack
HurricaneTrack.com
HurricaneTrack.com
Posts: 1781
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 10:46 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#4 Postby hurricanetrack » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:14 am

Oooooh, good thought. Seriously, that is a good line of thinking. Very nice.

I cannot imagine there only being 1 named storm in any year. Even 4 like 1983 would probably drive a lot of us crazy. We love tracking these things- hate it when they hit land and hurt people but we anticipate each season so much that having only 1-4 named storms would be insane.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: 1914= one storm?

#5 Postby Hurricanehink » Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:13 pm

http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/metadata_1911-14.html#1914_additional In the re-analysis, they found two systems worth investigating. One was an extratropical storm in the Gulf of Mexico in September, and the other was estimated to have been a tropical depression. So, technically, 1914 has two tropical cyclones, but only one storm in HURDAT, since the best track doesn't include systems that peaked as a TD.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

Re: 1914= one storm?

#6 Postby HurricaneBill » Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:01 pm

I wonder if the eruption of Mount Novarupta in 1912 had something to do with it?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20012
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: 1914= one storm?

#7 Postby tolakram » Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:17 pm

Possible.

http://www.avo.alaska.edu/volcanoes/vol ... age=basics

... On the afternoon of June 6, 1912 .... Although almost all the magma vented at Novarupta, most of it had been stored beneath Mount Katmai 10 km away, which collapsed during the eruption. Airborne ash from the 3-day event blanketed all of southern Alaska, and its gritty fallout was reported as far away as Dawson, Ketchikan, and Puget Sound [see fig. 21 in original text]. Volcanic dust and sulfurous aerosol were detected within days over Wisconsin and Virginia; within 2 weeks over California, Europe, and North Africa; and in latter-day ice cores recently drilled on the Greenland ice cap."
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: 1914= one storm?

#8 Postby Ptarmigan » Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:31 pm

1914 probably had at least 4 storms. There are probably fish storms most likely. Also, I believe we were coming off of an El Nino that time.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HurakaYoshi, Kennethb, NotSparta, Steve H., Xlhunter3 and 401 guests