2 am advisory subtle but significant change

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

2 am advisory subtle but significant change

#1 Postby Vortex » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:02 am

INTERESTS ELSEWHERE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...CUBA...
THE NORTHEASTERN YUCATAN PENINSULA OF MEXICO...THE FLORIDA KEYS AND
SOUTHERN FLORIDA...AND THE SOUTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO...SHOULD
MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF ERNESTO.


****Southern Florida now included in the monitor closely. Obviously there well aware of the guidance shift and I expect this to be reflected in the 5 am track
0 likes   

User avatar
Acral
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:31 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, AL
Contact:

#2 Postby Acral » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:03 am

Very interesting .. still 5 days out if it maintains, and I feel that could be a question as well.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: 2 am advisory subtle but significant change

#3 Postby MWatkins » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:07 am

Vortex wrote:INTERESTS ELSEWHERE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...CUBA...
THE NORTHEASTERN YUCATAN PENINSULA OF MEXICO...THE FLORIDA KEYS AND
SOUTHERN FLORIDA...AND THE SOUTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO...SHOULD
MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF ERNESTO.


****Southern Florida now included in the monitor closely. Obviously there well aware of the guidance shift and I expect this to be reflected in the 5 am track


I am thinking the same thing the second I read the advisory, Jason. Right now I would rather be here in SE Florida than Tampa...but that is a subtle and significant shift.

The slowdown vs. the 11PM advisory position is also suggestive of a center up under the deep convection...the vortex fix was only through obvs 5...they will likely find stonger winds as they look around.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
SouthAlabamaWX
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Coastal Alabama

Re: 2 am advisory subtle but significant change

#4 Postby SouthAlabamaWX » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:08 am

Vortex wrote:INTERESTS ELSEWHERE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA...CUBA...
THE NORTHEASTERN YUCATAN PENINSULA OF MEXICO...THE FLORIDA KEYS AND
SOUTHERN FLORIDA...AND THE SOUTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO...SHOULD
MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF ERNESTO.


****Southern Florida now included in the monitor closely. Obviously there well aware of the guidance shift and I expect this to be reflected in the 5 am track


The same call to action statement was used during IVAN in 2004.
0 likes   

User avatar
stormspotter
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 8:34 am
Location: Mobile, Al.

#5 Postby stormspotter » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:08 am

http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200605_sat.html

Slowing system, soon to be a hurricane, you can throw all models out past 48 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#6 Postby LAwxrgal » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:10 am

So, can someone please explain to me what's caused this significant shift right? I know the center reformed itself to the east, but is there something else?

And, also, according to the GFS, a Florida Keys landfall is forecast in 3 days...wouldn't that fall under the 3-day margin for error?
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

User avatar
Incident_MET
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:22 pm
Location: Floridana Beach, FL

#7 Postby Incident_MET » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:11 am

The UL low is pulling away rather quickly and the shear has been lessening during the evening. See no reason why the convection should get organized closer to the center and we see some noteworthy strengthening this morning.
0 likes   

Droop12
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Indianapolis

#8 Postby Droop12 » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:19 am

I agree, especially with the notable blowup of convection we saw right over the LLC before the eclipse.
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

#9 Postby MWatkins » Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:35 am

Droop12 wrote:I agree, especially with the notable blowup of convection we saw right over the LLC before the eclipse.


The satellite presenation after the eclipse is quite impressive. Looks like we are geting close to a hurricane if we don't have one already. The CDO and outflow are deeper and have expanded out in all directions...the upper environment..unfortunately...is improving.

MW
0 likes   
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack

User avatar
SouthAlabamaWX
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Coastal Alabama

#10 Postby SouthAlabamaWX » Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:52 am

MWatkins wrote:
Droop12 wrote:I agree, especially with the notable blowup of convection we saw right over the LLC before the eclipse.


The satellite presenation after the eclipse is quite impressive. Looks like we are geting close to a hurricane if we don't have one already. The CDO and outflow are deeper and have expanded out in all directions...the upper environment..unfortunately...is improving.

MW


I agree
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

#11 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:58 am

Im not throwing any models away after 48...most are starting 2 agree. If we threw models away, we wouldnt need them.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duilaslol and 41 guests