Cyclone Larry Gallery
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Cyclone Larry Gallery
I have been out of the weather loop during last week (in Mobile, ALA stuck on a drilling exploration ship doing software upgrades) and just read about the CAT 5 Australia Cyclone that hit at 180MPH last week.
http://www.news.com.au/index/0,10121,5001104,00.html
Seeing these photos brings back home as the Atlantic Hurricane season approaches.
http://www.news.com.au/index/0,10121,5001104,00.html
Seeing these photos brings back home as the Atlantic Hurricane season approaches.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
Though lots of damage...none of those photos really look like 180mph Cat. 5 force damage (which is the strength Larry was suppose to be at landfall). Most of those pictures I looked at seemed to only show Cat. 1/2 force damage, and even the very bad damage pictures could have been done by Cat. 3/4 force winds.
0 likes
- JtSmarts
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1437
- Age: 39
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:29 pm
- Location: Columbia, South Carolina
Extremeweatherguy wrote:Though lots of damage...none of those photos really look like 180mph Cat. 5 force damage (which is the strength Larry was suppose to be at landfall). Most of those pictures I looked at seemed to only show Cat. 1/2 force damage, and even the very bad damage pictures could have been done by Cat. 3/4 force winds.
Gusts were around 180mph sustained winds where somewhere between 120-140mph.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm
Extremeweatherguy wrote:Though lots of damage...none of those photos really look like 180mph Cat. 5 force damage (which is the strength Larry was suppose to be at landfall). Most of those pictures I looked at seemed to only show Cat. 1/2 force damage, and even the very bad damage pictures could have been done by Cat. 3/4 force winds.
ageed....
0 likes
- AussieMark
- Category 5
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
conestogo_flood wrote:A women I worked for, her sister lives in the area where the cyclone hit. She has yet to establish contact with her. I haven't seen much media coverage. How bad is it in Australia? Did Wati ever hit?
Wati never hit
damages to agriculture is very severe tho
i.e around 80-90% of australia's banana supply comes from North Queensland. around 80% was wiped out. will take about 18 months for the area to be able to supply bananas basically. the damage bill for that is at least $300 Million. s a result the costs have doubled nationwide since the cyclone.
Around $200 Million worth of the sugar cane was wiped out also or 10% of australias sugar cane production.
around $15 Million worth of Advacado were also wiped out which is between 15% - 20% of the national crop.
its the costliest cyclone since 1974.
the costliest natural disaster since the 1999 Sydney hailstorm which caused damages of $1.7 Billion
0 likes
- AussieMark
- Category 5
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
Extremeweatherguy wrote:Though lots of damage...none of those photos really look like 180mph Cat. 5 force damage (which is the strength Larry was suppose to be at landfall). Most of those pictures I looked at seemed to only show Cat. 1/2 force damage, and even the very bad damage pictures could have been done by Cat. 3/4 force winds.
no-one ever said that sutained winds were at 180 mph unless it was your stupid media

when they reported it here it was like winds of up to 285 km/h which I concluded they were talking about how high the gusts were
0 likes
- AussieMark
- Category 5
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
- beachbum_al
- Category 5
- Posts: 2163
- Age: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
- Location: South Alabama Coast
- Contact:
- AussieMark
- Category 5
- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
- Location: near Sydney, Australia
The sustained winds were in an Atlantic Basin range of CAT 3 with high velocity gusts..............almost the same as Celia in 1970 that hit Corpus Christi at 130 with gusts to 180MPH.
AussieMark is correct regarding the sustained winds and gusts. Australia measures the max severity at a gust level rather than sustained speeds like here in the States.
Bottom line winds over 130 sustained or gusts in Australia or the States is extreme.
Lets all pray and hope for the best for those at ground zero
AussieMark is correct regarding the sustained winds and gusts. Australia measures the max severity at a gust level rather than sustained speeds like here in the States.
Bottom line winds over 130 sustained or gusts in Australia or the States is extreme.
Lets all pray and hope for the best for those at ground zero
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:54 am
- Location: Australia, QLD, Caboolture 45km north of Brisbane
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Argcane, quaqualita and 71 guests