Check Out The Area of Deep Convection Off Africa!

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
MiamiensisWx

Check Out The Area of Deep Convection Off Africa!

#1 Postby MiamiensisWx » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:48 pm

Look at this area of deep convection off Africa!

Image

Imagine if it was July, August, or September now!

By the way, since this is January, this might be a picture to save quickly!
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23694
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#2 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:51 pm

can I say "here we go"??? :eek:
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#3 Postby MiamiensisWx » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:51 pm

Did you save the picture above, boca_chris?
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23694
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#4 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:52 pm

yes, I'm afraid 2006 is going to be a nightmare....

what's the shear look like there? Maps anybody?
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#5 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:53 pm

I've saved the picture into my Zeta folder as Zeta is in the upper-left corner.

Overall this is of little interest. You can see this is part of the ITCZ, which currently is very far south, and that shear, though ripping this convection apart, is also creating increased upper-level divergence to spark off these storms.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23694
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#6 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:55 pm

well it certainly is impressive for early January....very impressive
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#7 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:57 pm

boca_chris wrote:well it certainly is impressive for early January....very impressive


Maybe the colors on the satellite...but this is as disorganized as my closet. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#8 Postby george_r_1961 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:00 pm

Agreed. While it looks good this isnt going to develop into anything. Strong westerly winds aloft are prevalent across the tropics.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23694
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#9 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:11 pm

Agreed. While it looks good this isnt going to develop into anything. Strong westerly winds aloft are prevalent across the tropics.


I sure hope not! It's January!
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#10 Postby conestogo_flood » Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:32 pm

Oh my God. Is that going to become a hurricane? Jeez.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#11 Postby MiamiensisWx » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:15 am

I know it won't develop. However, it looks very tropical on satellite imagery and is quite impressive for January, even though it is being sheared. If this were July, August, or September, it might very well have been a different story.

It is still firing impressive convection on infra-red imagery...

Image
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#12 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:17 am

not that unusual. Just ITCZ convection in its normal place
0 likes   

User avatar
Astro_man92
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1493
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
Contact:

#13 Postby Astro_man92 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:47 pm

last night it was pretty deep reds all over and even quite a bit of grey
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#14 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:46 pm

A new area of convection is exiting Africa- but it'll probably
fizzle in 2-3 days due to shear unless shear lessens
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#15 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:47 pm

Interesting to note that SSTs are slightly above normal in this
area even though SSTAs have been on a downward trend
0 likes   

User avatar
JamesFromMaine2
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 989
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:38 am
Location: Portland Maine USA
Contact:

#16 Postby JamesFromMaine2 » Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:19 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Interesting to note that SSTs are slightly above normal in this
area even though SSTAs have been on a downward trend


Well I don't know if you have seen this but SSTAs are back up for Dec.

YEAR MO SST ANOM
2004 12 27.56 0.95
2005 1 26.84 0.99
2005 2 26.52 1.06
2005 3 26.63 1.18
2005 4 26.75 0.96
2005 5 27.41 1.18
2005 6 27.82 1.19
2005 7 28.06 1.03
2005 8 28.46 0.92
2005 9 28.75 0.86
2005 10 28.57 0.72
2005 11 27.95 0.54
2005 12 27.37 0.76
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#17 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Mon Jan 09, 2006 8:55 am

JamesFromMaine2 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Interesting to note that SSTs are slightly above normal in this
area even though SSTAs have been on a downward trend


Well I don't know if you have seen this but SSTAs are back up for Dec.

YEAR MO SST ANOM
2004 12 27.56 0.95
2005 1 26.84 0.99
2005 2 26.52 1.06
2005 3 26.63 1.18
2005 4 26.75 0.96
2005 5 27.41 1.18
2005 6 27.82 1.19
2005 7 28.06 1.03
2005 8 28.46 0.92
2005 9 28.75 0.86
2005 10 28.57 0.72
2005 11 27.95 0.54
2005 12 27.37 0.76


Yes thanks I hadn't seen that latest update until later. So yes
Cape Verde 06 could be bad.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#18 Postby wxmann_91 » Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:06 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Interesting to note that SSTs are slightly above normal in this
area even though SSTAs have been on a downward trend


Well I don't know if you have seen this but SSTAs are back up for Dec.

YEAR MO SST ANOM
2004 12 27.56 0.95
2005 1 26.84 0.99
2005 2 26.52 1.06
2005 3 26.63 1.18
2005 4 26.75 0.96
2005 5 27.41 1.18
2005 6 27.82 1.19
2005 7 28.06 1.03
2005 8 28.46 0.92
2005 9 28.75 0.86
2005 10 28.57 0.72
2005 11 27.95 0.54
2005 12 27.37 0.76


Yes thanks I hadn't seen that latest update until later. So yes
Cape Verde 06 could be bad.


I want to remind everybody (not direct at you TBH), that SST's aren't what determine the CV season, SAL and shear do. If we have an anomalously strong eastern Atlantic ridge and an anomalously strong central Atlantic UL trough then it will be like this year (though I highly doubt that it'll be like that two years in a row), then even if eastern Atlantic SST's are record high, few CV storms will form.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

#19 Postby Windtalker1 » Mon Jan 09, 2006 7:14 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:
JamesFromMaine2 wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Interesting to note that SSTs are slightly above normal in this
area even though SSTAs have been on a downward trend


Well I don't know if you have seen this but SSTAs are back up for Dec.

YEAR MO SST ANOM
2004 12 27.56 0.95
2005 1 26.84 0.99
2005 2 26.52 1.06
2005 3 26.63 1.18
2005 4 26.75 0.96
2005 5 27.41 1.18
2005 6 27.82 1.19
2005 7 28.06 1.03
2005 8 28.46 0.92
2005 9 28.75 0.86
2005 10 28.57 0.72
2005 11 27.95 0.54
2005 12 27.37 0.76


Yes thanks I hadn't seen that latest update until later. So yes
Cape Verde 06 could be bad.


I want to remind everybody (not direct at you TBH), that SST's aren't what determine the CV season, SAL and shear do. If we have an anomalously strong eastern Atlantic ridge and an anomalously strong central Atlantic UL trough then it will be like this year (though I highly doubt that it'll be like that two years in a row), then even if eastern Atlantic SST's are record high, few CV storms will form.
Yah, they will all form closer to home like 2005 which is a "Bad Thing"
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], ljmac75 and 67 guests