#111 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Tue Dec 27, 2005 12:58 pm
Okay, I'll put my post script on it, since one of the mods has related her desire for it all to end.
I did NOT come in this thread to insult, attack, or disparage anyone for their convictions regarding Katrina, or the Katrina report. As to considering the report an "insult" I agree with a much earlier post that such a claim is off the mark. When one tenders personification to an inanimate report one loses a lot of credibility. The report is most decidedly NOT an insult. It's just that I "respectfully" (stated so many times) disagree.
It seems that disagreement unleashed a lot of umbrage from those who steadfastly defend it. This was decidedly unintended. My comments were just that--my comments and opinions. As one who has been in the much revered science community for over 30 years I can well understand the shackles being raised by those demanding empirical data. Inability to provide it does not mean it isn't there--just ask the many in the scientific community who argued the existence of neutrinos before it became a proven fact.
Professional disagreement is not a bad thing unless some with axes to grind, or superiority complexes begin to change the dialogue to one of "who are you to challenge the experts," and subsequently interject a hubris that tends to escalate the dialogue beyond that for which it was intended. Well I say experts have been wrong in the past, and will continue to be wrong betimes in the future. This is NOT to detract from the hard work, and honest effort being made by the VAST majority of those involved in pursuing their vocations and avocations--or their complete sincerity and trust in their findings. I just would like to see the same quarter given those who do not take as gospel every utterance from the aforementioned experts.
That said, I will defer to our esteemed Mod who has suggested the topic "end." and bow out of this discussion, with the added codicil that while I in no way challenge the integrity or expertise of those professionals who put their faith in the findings reported, I maintain my right to disagree with them as well. Only time will tell, if ever, who is more accurate here, and I concede that the current data and science is on the side of those defending the report, I equally repeat that it wouldn't be the first time that the "available data" was off, even if by small measure, and it will not be the last.
Regarding the "refugees" in Texas, I agree with the above poster, it is a shame, and hope you do not judge all from this area by those who've descended on your gracious community. I was treated with exceptional charity when in "exile" and to this day we still communicate on a regular basis. We're not all the kinds of ingrates depicted, and it is indeed a disgrace. Personally, I hope Texas law deals with them more stridently than did the Louisiana law which tended to pander more than curtail. You indeed have MY thanks, and my sympathy.
In closing, it seems I've been compared to someone who's made "blatantly stupid" comments--albeit in a somewhat more positive light--I presume that to be a sideways compliment. And I honestly do hope that in expressing my opinions and experiences I've offended no one, as none was intended. Dialogue and debate are things I thoroughly enjoy, and I thought I found it here. This is truly a wonderful site, (kudos to the mods and the admin) and I will henceforth restrict my wanderings to other threads--albeit doubtless be less involved as one tends to be more verbose in things of greater interest. I'm sure this comes as wonderful news to some. And that said... I hopefully put my contributions in this thread to a respectful end.
PAX and a Happy New Year to all!
A2K
0 likes