Wilma: another midget intense hurricane?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Post Reply
Message
Author
SamSagnella
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 630
Age: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Westport, CT
Contact:
Contact SamSagnella

#21 Postby SamSagnella » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:23 pm

Look how well established that outflow channel is!
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:
Contact SouthFloridawx

#22 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:24 pm

Image
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:
Contact SouthFloridawx

#23 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:25 pm

Image
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#24 Postby MGC » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:21 pm

Recon reports a very tight wind field. 100mph and still only 15 miles radius of hurriane force winds. This hurricane has a very steep pressure gradient near the center. Recon reports a 8NM wide eye, small and intense, just like I said....MGC
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#25 Postby senorpepr » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:29 pm

MGC wrote:Recon reports a very tight wind field. 100mph and still only 15 miles radius of hurriane force winds. This hurricane has a very steep pressure gradient near the center. Recon reports a 8NM wide eye, small and intense, just like I said....MGC


The inner core has become very tight, but the system as a whole is still rather loose. The possibility remains that it will keep this tight core and begin to further expand like Katrina.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:
Contact dhweather

#26 Postby dhweather » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:33 pm

senorpepr wrote:
MGC wrote:Recon reports a very tight wind field. 100mph and still only 15 miles radius of hurriane force winds. This hurricane has a very steep pressure gradient near the center. Recon reports a 8NM wide eye, small and intense, just like I said....MGC


The inner core has become very tight, but the system as a whole is still rather loose. The possibility remains that it will keep this tight core and begin to further expand like Katrina.


Conversely, it could remain an camille/andrew/charley like storm.
Small but very intense.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#27 Postby senorpepr » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:35 pm

dhweather wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
MGC wrote:Recon reports a very tight wind field. 100mph and still only 15 miles radius of hurriane force winds. This hurricane has a very steep pressure gradient near the center. Recon reports a 8NM wide eye, small and intense, just like I said....MGC


The inner core has become very tight, but the system as a whole is still rather loose. The possibility remains that it will keep this tight core and begin to further expand like Katrina.


Conversely, it could remain an camille/andrew/charley like storm.
Small but very intense.


Actually, I wouldn't compare this to Camille, Andrew, or Charley... they were much smaller.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#28 Postby senorpepr » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:36 pm

senorpepr wrote:
dhweather wrote:
senorpepr wrote:
MGC wrote:Recon reports a very tight wind field. 100mph and still only 15 miles radius of hurriane force winds. This hurricane has a very steep pressure gradient near the center. Recon reports a 8NM wide eye, small and intense, just like I said....MGC


The inner core has become very tight, but the system as a whole is still rather loose. The possibility remains that it will keep this tight core and begin to further expand like Katrina.


Conversely, it could remain an camille/andrew/charley like storm.
Small but very intense.


Actually, I wouldn't compare this to Camille, Andrew, or Charley... they were much smaller.
Actually... let me rephrease that... Andrew and Charley were much smaller...
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#29 Postby MGC » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:36 pm

Katrina's wind field expanded the day after moving off shore and the pressure didn't drop very fast. Then, Saturday night the bottom fell out. Four of Wilma's eyes could fit into Katrina. Wilma has a steep pressure gradient in the inner core. This hurricane reminds me of Charley or Iris in 2001. Iris was small, 125kts 948mb.....MGC
Last edited by MGC on Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:
Contact dhweather

#30 Postby dhweather » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:36 pm

What I mean with the comparison is a relatively small area of intense
winds.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#31 Postby senorpepr » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:38 pm

dhweather wrote:What I mean with the comparison is a relatively small area of intense
winds.


Okay, in that case... I'll go along with that. :)
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#32 Postby artist » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:40 pm

so senorpeper - you are saying the winds field could increase - hurricane force that is?
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:
Contact dhweather

#33 Postby dhweather » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:41 pm

artist wrote:so senorpeper - you are saying the winds field could increase - hurricane force that is?


They certainly can.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:
Contact senorpepr

#34 Postby senorpepr » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:44 pm

artist wrote:so senorpeper - you are saying the winds field could increase - hurricane force that is?


dhweather said it best: they certainly can.
0 likes   
Top
User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#35 Postby artist » Tue Oct 18, 2005 8:45 pm

thanks to both of you! :wink:
0 likes   
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests