This has been a strange season, I
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
wxcrazytwo
This has been a strange season, I
don't ever remember a season being quite like this one have you? The season has not been following climatology, TD's that should been dissipated don't and grow into monsters, we have waves that die and then a week later form. Is this the kind of weather we will be seeing for a long time to come or is this just 1-100 year type of situation. Comments Welcome.
0 likes
- terstorm1012
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1314
- Age: 44
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
- Location: Millersburg, PA
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38264
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
I would expect above average seasons(although hopefully not this busy) for the next 10-20 years AT LEAST barring El Nino(like 1997).
I was watching a replay on C-SPAN of Max Mayfield testifying before Congress on Friday, and he said that even in an inactive cycle, you cannot let your guard down since 1992 was a slow year(only 6 named storms), but Andrew hit.
I was watching a replay on C-SPAN of Max Mayfield testifying before Congress on Friday, and he said that even in an inactive cycle, you cannot let your guard down since 1992 was a slow year(only 6 named storms), but Andrew hit.
0 likes
#neversummer
- Weatherfreak14
- Category 5

- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:40 pm
- Location: Beaufort, SC
- Contact:
the thing that dissapoints me is that we didn't get a True long tracker or Cape Verde System this year......not that i wish one of them on anyone, however it doesn't seem like a true Hurricane Season without at least one long tracker....the conditions were just too hostile this year
Now watch next year, we get nothing but long trackers lol
Now watch next year, we get nothing but long trackers lol
0 likes
-
krysof
Duffy wrote:the thing that dissapoints me is that we didn't get a True long tracker or Cape Verde System this year......not that i wish one of them on anyone, however it doesn't seem like a true Hurricane Season without at least one long tracker....the conditions were just too hostile this year
Now watch next year, we get nothing but long trackers lol
and with our bad luck, most of them will hit land
0 likes
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 9476
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO dont say that, drat, you jinxed us, Gordon is going to be the worst next year...krysof wrote:Duffy wrote:the thing that dissapoints me is that we didn't get a True long tracker or Cape Verde System this year......not that i wish one of them on anyone, however it doesn't seem like a true Hurricane Season without at least one long tracker....the conditions were just too hostile this year
Now watch next year, we get nothing but long trackers lol
and with our bad luck, most of them will hit land
0 likes
-
NastyCat4
- brunota2003
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 9476
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
- Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
- Contact:
But the hurricanes to date this year havent given thought about climotology, Vince for example..., so MY predication is 25/11/6 for next year, with Gordon being the worst....NastyCat4 wrote:The only likelihood that can be predicted is it will be another "above average" year. There will be 11.6 OR MORE storms again, as that is the climate pattern we are in. Beyond that, we cannot even guess. A repeat of 20+ storms is statistically unlikely.
0 likes
-
krysof
NastyCat4 wrote:The only likelihood that can be predicted is it will be another "above average" year. There will be 11.6 OR MORE storms again, as that is the climate pattern we are in. Beyond that, we cannot even guess. A repeat of 20+ storms is statistically unlikely.
statistically, these storms don't care about statistics, or climatology, this year they just through it out the window
I can find a thread where people thought the first storm would form by mid July or late July. Instead we get Arlene in June.
0 likes
Duffy wrote:the thing that dissapoints me is that we didn't get a True long tracker or Cape Verde System this year......not that i wish one of them on anyone, however it doesn't seem like a true Hurricane Season without at least one long tracker....the conditions were just too hostile this year
Now watch next year, we get nothing but long trackers lol
they are fun to watch unless its named Katrina/Rita,monsters that blow up in your face at the last minute which gives less time to evacuate a city like NO or Houston which looked like the traffic jam of the century .roadside rages,flipoffs,fightsd ect
0 likes
-
NastyCat4
But the hurricanes to date this year havent given thought about climotology, Vince for example..., so MY predication is 25/11/6 for next year, with Gordon being the worst....
That simply is not going to happen--look at the years starting 1n 1995, and you can get an idea what next year will be. This was a 500 year event--expect 13-15 storms next season, and stop the hype. This year isn't over yet.
0 likes
-
tornadochaser86
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:19 am
- Location: University of South Alabama
- Contact:
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5

- Posts: 5598
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
NastyCat4 wrote:The only likelihood that can be predicted is it will be another "above average" year. There will be 11.6 OR MORE storms again, as that is the climate pattern we are in. Beyond that, we cannot even guess. A repeat of 20+ storms is statistically unlikely.
Yup it is statistically unlikely. But if some lurking variable is
helping to rev up these storms than we may see another
record-active year. But science has no way of knowing of these
lurking variables at this time.
GIVEN: The current multidecadal cycles.
Extrapolating:
There are many possible lurking variables that may in some way
affect cyclone activity,
Possibilites:
1. Global Warming
2. Volcanic Impacts
3. Solar Flare/Solar Factors
4. etc....
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Tue Oct 11, 2005 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
WeatherWiseGuy
- Tropical Depression

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: Florida
- wxmann_91
- Category 5

- Posts: 8013
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
- Location: Southern California
- Contact:
I have noted that the active cycles start and end in very active years, and that quiet cycles have abrupt beginnings and abrupt endings. Perhaps 2006 will be the beginning of a quiet cycle???
Example: the quiet period between 1970-1995 started abruptly after the crazy 1969 year (18 named storms by today's standards), with only 10 storms in 1970. It ended after 1994 (7 named) when 1995 brought on 19 named storms.
Wishful thinking, but nevertheless a possibility.
Example: the quiet period between 1970-1995 started abruptly after the crazy 1969 year (18 named storms by today's standards), with only 10 storms in 1970. It ended after 1994 (7 named) when 1995 brought on 19 named storms.
Wishful thinking, but nevertheless a possibility.
0 likes
- Dr. Jonah Rainwater
- Category 2

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
- Location: Frisco, Texas
- Contact:
At least for the past 5 years or so, The O-storm seems a pretty good benchmark. 2001 ended with Olga, 2003 ended with Odette and Peter, and 2004 ended with Otto. 2000 ended with Nadine and 1998 ended with Nicole. I don't think the enormity of this season was truly impressed upon me until I was tracking Hurricane Ophelia and realized it was early September, not November.
Aside from 1997, the two least-active hurricane seasons of the past decade were 1999 and 2002, which both only made it to the L storm, although there's a huge difference between 1999's 5 Category 4 storms, and 2002's lack of dignity.
I think the only thing that's really for sure, though...regardless of how much activity we see in 2006, someone's world will be turned upside down next year.
Aside from 1997, the two least-active hurricane seasons of the past decade were 1999 and 2002, which both only made it to the L storm, although there's a huge difference between 1999's 5 Category 4 storms, and 2002's lack of dignity.
I think the only thing that's really for sure, though...regardless of how much activity we see in 2006, someone's world will be turned upside down next year.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wwizard and 315 guests


