Air Force Met wrote:Hyperstorm wrote:
I believe the death toll was 256.
In terms of damages, yes...Katrina will likely be the TOP, but in terms of lives lost since 1950 (which is more valuable), it still not the top. And I hope that it never gets that title.
Regardless, every single storm would be the TOP for the people that are deeply affected by it...
I voted Katrina. To me it's a no-brainer. The amount of area affected alone in staggering. Even if you include Andrew's landfall on the Atlantic side of Florida. It was devastating but only for a small area. If Katrina would have made landfall in the same place as Andrew...you would be talking about a 10 foot surge in West Palm Beach and a 20-25 foot surge into downtown Miami. So...compare the two. What damage would have been done if Andrew had made landfall only where Katrina did...and compare it to what damage would have been done with Katrina making landfall in South Florida at her peak. Remember the pressure in Katrina was lower at landfall....and I think you will see the winds increased.
As far as death tolls...I have absolutely no doubts the death toll will top Camille's by 2X or more. In terms of deaths...this storm will be 10x or more deadlier easy.
In terms of homeless...Andrew left 250,000 people homeless. Katrina has left over 1 million homeless. In total scope...deaths...homeless...total damage...area affected....surge...Katrina is the hands-down winner. For those that aren't convinced...no debate needed...just wait a while until the truth finally begins to trickle out and is compiled.
Now you have made me think...
In terms of SCOPE, yes I totally agree. Katrina has affected many more people and if we combine all the effects, there is NO debate. Katrina could definitely be considered the TOP.
I just don't want to see the death toll go much higher than what it is...







