Page 1 of 1

The "Official" way to measure snow fall

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2003 11:50 am
by mf_dolphin
I just wonder how many millions were spent coming up with this :?:

How Do You Measure Snowfall?
By Brendan I. Koerner
Posted Monday, February 17, 2003, at 2:35 PM PT


The blizzard that's pounding the East Coast is supposedly the worst since 1996 in terms of snowfall. How exactly do meteorologists figure out how much of the white stuff tumbled down?


Science may have unlocked the secrets of the atom and sent probes past Jupiter, but it has yet to devise a foolproof, automated means of measuring snowfall. The most reliable technique still involves a human and a special ruler, divided into tenths-of-an-inch. Before a snowfall, an observer typically lays out several snowboards—not of the recreational variety, but rather simple 16-inch-by-16-inch planks, which are marked with bright flags. Ideally, these boards should be located in wide open areas where drifting will be minimal. The National Weather Service recommends that every six hours the observer should plunge his or her ruler into the snow that's accumulated atop the various boards; after a measurement is taken, each board should be dug up and placed on the freshest layer of snow. Average together the measurements taken from a dozen or so boards, and you've got your snowfall estimate.

The ruler method isn't quite perfect. Some snow may melt in between measurements, and strong winds can cause excessive drifting or blowing, even in open terrain. Plus, it's often hard to determine whether there's any frozen rain in the mix—the NWS frowns upon adding frozen rain totals to snowfall estimates. Still, trudging out with a ruler is a good deal more accurate than the alternate technique, whereby snow is collected in a cylindrical gauge and then melted. The general guideline is that 10 inches of snow is equal to 1 inch of water. This approach is favored for remote spots where observers may not be around to take manual measurements every day; the gauge is simply lined with antifreeze, to hasten melting, and can potentially be monitored from afar.

The problem is that the 10-to-1 ratio is merely a rough guesstimate. The actual water content varies widely, depending on the character of the snow. For the slushy stuff common to urban areas, the content may be more along the lines of 6 inches of snow per inch of water; the driest powder, by contrast, can pack 50 inches of snow into the same space. Unless you're on the scene during the snowfall, it's virtually impossible to tell exactly what varieties of snow fell during the blizzard, and in what proportions.

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2003 12:37 pm
by Rob-TheStormChaser
The NWS sent me a 'proper' way to use a snow board, take core samples from 3 spots and melt the snow in a pot and get the ratios as well. This is very accurate and when you balance it all out...you can truly see what you got opposed to whats piling up outside!

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:35 am
by ColdFront77
I have heard that you take three measurements on three different sides of a building (your house) and divide the total by three. This is better than nothing. :)

Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:57 am
by Rainband
:lol: :lol: Funny how you found that MF being you love the cold LMAO :wink:

seems easy enough...

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 4:34 pm
by pawlee
sure, lay out your snowboard before, get the 10th scale measuring stick from the NWS and plunk it in after the storm... right? WRONG! in dealing first hand with taking observational measurements for each storm this season, some snowfalls were a nightmare to measure and especially in the event that blowing/drifting occurred! yes, the snowboard method of recording is the standard but as we learned at our SWOP meeting, when situations arise as such, we are often left to offer our best guess based upon physical measurement and by melting what may have fallen into the gauge. even the melt is an elusive measurement as blowing snow goes right by without actually going in so believe me as one who once thought it was no biggie... accurately measuring snow is alot harder than it seems! p

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2003 8:02 pm
by Rob-TheStormChaser
Thats why they tell you to try to place a board out in a clear, say a field where there is some kind of shelter from winds and therefore making measuring much more accurate without the drifting. Its hard to get around drifts sometimes and NWS knows this, thats why you have to melt the core samples from 3 different areas and then you can get relatively close to whats on the ground and how much water content exists.

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 10:51 pm
by azskyman
Nolan Doesken and Arthur Judsen in Colorado have a great little book about measuring snowfall. Here's the link!

http://ulysses.atmos.colostate.edu/~odie/snowtxt.html