NC snow. Nogaps, ukmet, ggem are all in exceptional agreement in the track of the SLP system for this weekend/monday. The only missing piece of the puzzle is a strong high pressure system over southeast canada. A piece which i think will put in place as we draw closer and closer to this weekend, due to the intense 500mb/SLP system near NF. If things were to go as the global models are portraying now, there would be a CAD/in-situ/CAD type situation. This would lead to a snow/ice/rain mix over to snow, over portions of central and west NC/VA. GFS is showing copious amounts of moisture in TX/southeast.
SLP track from gulf coast to off of hatteras.
ISSUES-
1.) NF low- if the low near 50/50 is stronger than expected then there will be a higher chance for sinking air/HIGH pressure in southeast canada. This will also be a key influence on number 2.
2.) Alaskan Vortex s/w- Late this week a piece of energy appears to be ejected out of this alaskan vortex into southern canada. What happens with this s/w? does it gets sheared apart, does it get forced south? RIght now i would go for option 1, leading to no phase, and no blockbuster storm.
3.) Cutoff in the southwest- How fast will this s/w eject energy into the southeast or will it cutoff for a period of time?
Timing will be have to be perfect for a "MECS".
Timing will be crucial for a "major" NC snowstorm.
TIming will be significant for a "moderate" NC snowstorm.
ggem, ukmet, and nogaps are all showing a classic track for
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

I go by a real simple rule...................
"The simpler the storm, the more likely it will verify."
The more complicated the scenario........................the less probable it is to verify...................unless we are talking the upper northeast corridor, because MUCH less has to come together for there to be a BIG storm up there.
Can you say "Climatologically favored" ?
-JEB
"The simpler the storm, the more likely it will verify."
The more complicated the scenario........................the less probable it is to verify...................unless we are talking the upper northeast corridor, because MUCH less has to come together for there to be a BIG storm up there.
Can you say "Climatologically favored" ?
-JEB
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: wxman22 and 9 guests