Comparing Various factors to Major east coast snowstorms:

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
RNS
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: Saylorsburg PA
Contact:

Comparing Various factors to Major east coast snowstorms:

#1 Postby RNS » Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:15 pm

First off I hope everyone had a great thanksgiving day, though I know most of us cowboys fans didin/t…lol.

As some of you may be aware…I did a similar post concerning the connection between various phases of the ENSO (El Nino Southern oscillation), SOI (Southern Oscillation Index), NAO (North Atlantic oscillation), and MEI (Multi-relative ENSO index)…on Wright-weather bulletin board back on October 15. I felt that it would also be rather interesting to post this here as IMO many could benefit from knowing which particular phases and values of those factors would indicate in regard to the potential (or lack thereof) for a major east coast snow event.

First however, we must assess the state of the ENSO. In our winter outlook released here back on November 20th:

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=19199

And in a similar post a few days ago on the evolution toward El Nino conditions:

http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=19552

Erica and I outlined the fact that the general trending of the equatorial Pacific Sea Surface temperature anomalies during the past few months, and the current long-range SSTA forecasts from several well-known climate models, support the development of weak El Nino conditions by the end of December, and moderate El Nino conditions by as early as late spring (May 2004). While the potential formation of a moderate warm ENSO event is possible by spring, that feature would have more importance to the expected outcome of the 2004 hurricane season; it is the weak El Nino which should be present by the end of next month, which may help to determine the outcome of the 2003/04 winter (snow-wise) for much of the central and eastern part of the country.

The following figures show SSTA Evolution in weekly, monthly and seasonal time steps (from the CDC):

Seasonal product:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/ ... asonal.gif

Monthly product:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/ ... .month.gif

Weekly product:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/sst.anom.gif

Pronounced warming continues to take place along and just to the west of the dateline as SSTs in the region are now approaching 1.5 degrees Celsius above normal, and in the Nino 3.4 region of the central tropical pacific. Should this persist and expand during the month of December, El Nino conditions will be recognized by the end of the month. Remember, El Nino conditions are officially declared by NOAA when SSTA anomalies sin the Nino 3.4 region average above normal for at least three months.

The values below illustrate weekly SSTA anomalies in textual format over the past 12 weeks:

(Column 1 = Start Date…Column 2 = Nino 1+2 SST mean/SST anomaly…Column 3 = Nino 3.0 SST mean/SST anomaly…Column 4 = Nino 3.4 SST mean/SST anomaly… Column 2 = Nino 4.0 SST mean/SST anomaly)

03SEP2003 20.4 -.3 25.0 .1 26.9 .2 29.0 .5
10SEP2003 19.9 -.7 24.8 -.1 26.8 .1 28.9 .4
17SEP2003 19.5-1.0 25.0 .1 26.9 .2 28.9 .5
24SEP2003 20.5 -.2 25.0 .2 27.1 .5 29.1 .7
01OCT2003 20.1 -.7 25.3 .4 27.3 .6 29.1 .7
08OCT2003 20.9 .1 25.5 .6 27.4 .8 29.1 .7
15OCT2003 20.9 .0 25.2 .3 27.1 .5 29.1 .7
22OCT2003 21.5 .5 25.3 .3 27.1 .5 29.3 .9
29OCT2003 21.4 .2 25.4 .5 27.2 .6 29.3 1.0
05NOV2003 21.6 .2 25.3 .4 27.0 .5 29.4 1.0
12NOV2003 21.8 .3 25.3 .4 26.9 .4 29.3 1.0
19NOV2003 22.0 .2 25.4 .5 27.1 .5 29.3 1.0


As we can tell…the greatest warming relative to normal has taken place in the Nino 4.0 region over the past several weeks…however…we have began to notice a pronounced warming of the SSTA in the remainder of the ENSO regions (1+2, 3.0, and 3.4). At the present time…all four Nino regions have been averaging warmer than normal, with the greatest departures above normal in the western pacific with SSTA now running (according to the weekly averages over the past four weeks) as high as 1.0 degrees above normal. Although, that said, some day to day fluctuations in the exact SSTA values in these regions can yield a lower or higher value than what is being observed in the weekly mean. This is especially the case when we look at the latest SSTA map from the CDC…which has been indicating SSTA of up to 1.5 degrees in the Nino 4.0 region during the past week.

FTP access to weekly and monthly SST/SSTA analysis data-sets from the CPC:

Weekly Analysis (1990-present):

ftp://ftpprd.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/cpc/wd52 ... /wksst.for

Monthly Analysis (text – 1950 to present):

ftp://ftpprd.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/cpc/wd52 ... oi.indices
Graphical depiction (1984 to present):

Image

The majority of climate models also support the evolution to El Nino conditions during the first half of 2004.

NCEP Model:

Three Month mean:

Image

Monthly SSTA forecast:

Image

Monthly Sub-surface temperature anomaly forecast:

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/c ... EQTvrt.gif

And many of the ensembles:

Nino 3.0 SSTA forecast:

Image

Nino 3.4 SSTA forecast:

Image

The majority of the warming based on the implications of the model forecast would take place in the central and western pacific (Nino regions 3.4 and 4.0…which is a favorable signal for a cold/snowy winter in the eastern part of the country)

FTP access to SSTA forecasts:

ftp://ftp.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/cmb/Forecasts/enso

The SCRIPPS forecast by far remains the most bullish on the evolution to warm conditions:

http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~pierce/elnino/pictures.html

My take on the subject remains unchanged…which would be for ENSO neutral (although slightly warm Neutral conditions) to persist through the remainder of the month, and eventually begin to translate to weak El Nino from west to east (however the warmest anomalies early on should remain confined to the areas closest to the dateline and in the western portions of the Nino 4.0 region through march) while near average conditions remain intact in the eastern pacific closest to the coast of south America.

As we get out toward the end of the winter…further inquiry will be needed to determine whether or not a moderate El Nino will develop during this time period and what impacts it might have on the coming hurricane season.

Other factors such as the SOI and MEI are dictated by the observed phase of the ENSO. That said, if La Nina conditions are present would likely see a Positive SOI, and an MEI ranking of between 1 and 3, MEI rankings of three would indicate a weak La Nina event, two…moderate La Nina…and one…strong La Nina. An MEI ranking of 4 is indicative of ENSO neutral conditions, then five through seven would denote El Nino Conditions, with 5 outlining a weak El Nino…6 Moderate El Nino…and 7 Strong El Nino. The SOI is normally negative in El Nino years, while a variable SOI. For a detailed description of these features, consult our winter outlook.

We expect…based on the current trending in Atlantic Sea Surface temperature anomalies, that we will be dealing with a neutral to negative NAO this coming winter. Cold water has developed across the north central Atlantic between the east coast of Newfoundland, and the west coast of Europe, with warmer than average SSTA in the far north Atlantic, and tropical Atlantic, the theory behind this is that storm systems will be encouraged to deepen off the east coast and move northward, then eastward across the Atlantic as compared to deepening straight up toward Greenland, helping to pump heat northward, raise heights, and develop blocking.

Research in recent years has shown a distinct correlation between the Nino 3.4 SSTs and the frequency of major east coast snowstorms, connections between these events, the SOI, MEI (Multi-relative ENSO Index) and NAO have also been drawn up. I will also be including a rather interesting connection between the monthly QBO index values and the frequency of such events.

The following are a listing of major east coast snowstorms as determined by Paul Kocin and Dr. Louis Ucceleini in a publication through the American meteorological society:

MAR 18-19, 1956 FEB 14-17, 1958
MAR 18-21, 1958 MAR 2-5, 1960
DEC 11-13, 1960 JAN 18-21, 1961
FEB 2-5, 1961 JAN 11-14, 1964
JAN 29-31, 1966 DEC 23-25, 1966
FEB 5-7, 1967 FEB 8-10, 1969
FEB 25-28, 1969 DEC 25-28, 1969
FEB 18-20, 1972 JAN 19-21, 1978
FEB 5-7, 1978 FEB 17- 19, 1979
APR 6-7, 1982 FEB 10-12, 1983
JAN 21-23, 1987 JAN 25-27, 1987
FEB 22-24, 1987 MAR 12-14, 1993
FEB 8-12, 1994 FEB 2-4, 1995
JAN 6-8, 1996 MAR 31-APR 1, 1997


Of the events listed above, 16 out of the 28 events occurred with an El Nino of some strength in the Equatorial pacific. 9 of 28 occurred with ENSO neutral conditions, and only three of the 28 occurred w/ a La Nina of any strength.

Out of those events occurring with an El Nino:

4/16 – w/ a Weak El Nino (MEI ranking 4 to 5)
6/16 – w/ a Weak to Moderate El Nino (MEI ranking 5 to 6)
6/16 – w/ a Moderate to Strong El Nino (MEI ranking greater than 6)


It would appear as if a greater frequency of major east coast snowstorms is maximized in El Nino years, with an even number of events (6 events) occurring with both a weak to moderate and moderate to strong El Nino/s.

La Nina conditions:

2/3 w/ a Weak La Nina (MEI ranking 3)
0/3 w/ a Moderate La Nina (MEI ranking 2)
1/3 w/ a Strong La Nina (MEI ranking 1)


While the most total events occur in El Nino years, 9 of the storms occurred in ENSO neutral winters, once one divides the El Nino events up according to the strength of the El Nino we find that less total events (6 events in Weak to moderate and moderate to strong El Nino years) occur as compared to the 9 total which occur in ENSO neutral winters.

Nino 3.4 SSTs:

Nino 3.4 SSTa -0.5 to -1.0 -----> 2 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa -0.5 to 0.0 -----> 5 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa 0.0 to +0.5 -----> 4 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa +0.5 to +1.0 -----> 4 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa +1.0 to +1.5 -----> 6 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa +1.5 to +2.0 -----> 2 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa +2.0 to +2.5 -----> 0 events
Nino 3.4 SSTa +2.5 to +3.0 -----> 1 event


It would appear as if the greatest number of events occur in periods where Nino 3.4 SST anomalies are between +1.0 and +1.5 degrees above normal. A less (however still comparable) number of events occur with SST anomalies between -0.5 to 0.0, 0.0 to +0.5, and +1.0 to +1.5.

Now for the SOI:

SOI +1.5 to +2.0 ---> 1 event
SOI +1.0 to +1.5 ---> 0 events
SOI +0.5 to +1.0 ---> 5 events
SOI +0.0 to +0.5 ---> 1 event
SOI –0.0 to –0.5 ---> 6 events
SOI –0.5 to –1.0 ---> 6 events
SOI –1.0 to –1.5 ---> 3 events
SOI –1.5 to –2.0 ---> 2 events
SOI –2.0 to –2.5 ---> 0 events
SOI –2.5 to –3.0 ---> 0 events
SOI –3.0 to –3.5 ---> 0 events
SOI –3.5 to –4.0 ---> 1 event
SOI –4.0 to –4.5 ---> 0 events
SOI –4.5 to –5.0 ---> 1 event


For the data above, one can surmise that the best probability for a major east coast snow event based on the SOI would be maximized in periods where the SOI is between 0.0
To -1.0. 12 total events occurred when the SOI was in that range. The other events which occurred in periods when the SOI was strongly negative…between -3.5 to -4.0 and -4.5 to -5.0 would most likely denote isolated cases.

The NAO comparison:

Another possible influencing factor on the formation of major east coast snowstorms may also be the North Atlantic Oscillation.

17 of the 28 events occurred with a negative monthly averaged NAO, as compared to 11 of 28 with a positive monthly averaged NAO.

The QBO connection:

It would seem as if the greatest frequency of major east coast snowstorms based on the observed monthly phase of the QBO would occur in months where the QBO is between +/- 10.00 of neutral (0.00), however, when QBO values were greater than +10.00 (strong west) far more events occurred as compared to when the QBO was Strong east (-10.00 or better), thus feature the least potential (statistically) for a major east coast snow event, however that is not to say that it still can/t happen.

QBO weak East or West (between +/- 10.00): Greatest overall Potential
QBO Strongly west (greater than +10.00): Second greatest Potential
QBO Strongly east (greater than -10.00): Least Potential.


A link to the QBO dataset is provided below:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/correlation/qbo.data

Given this assessment, one would expect to see a major east coast snow event when ENSO neutral to Moderate El Nino conditions exist in the tropical pacific, an MEI ranking at or above 4, negative NAO, Nino 3.4 SST anomalies between +1.0 and +1.5 degrees above normal, and a negative SOI between 0.0 and -1.0. QBO near neutral QBO values are also preferred.
Last edited by RNS on Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

#2 Postby Dave C » Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:34 pm

Excellant and informative post. Could you post links or give your own description of the terms used...ENSO,SOI,NAO,ENSO.? I've heard these terms used before in past messages and on other boards and as I'm an amateur in the feild, as are many other posters, it would be helpfull to have info. on those terms. Thanks in advance!!! :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Stormsfury
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10549
Age: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Summerville, SC

#3 Postby Stormsfury » Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:46 pm

Dave C wrote:Excellant and informative post. Could you post links or give your own description of the terms used...ENSO,SOI,NAO,ENSO.? I've heard these terms used before in past messages and on other boards and as I'm an amateur in the feild, as are many other posters, it would be helpfull to have info. on those terms. Thanks in advance!!! :)


Dave, you might want to start here ...

http://www.stormsfury1.com/Weather/Info.html
0 likes   

User avatar
RNS
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: Saylorsburg PA
Contact:

#4 Postby RNS » Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:56 pm

thanks dave...you can use the link provided by SF for more detailed information on those factors...and/or consault our winter outlook.

Below are the actual names for the factors which the acronyms are based on:

ENSO = El Nino / Southern Oscillation
SOI = Southern oscillation index
NAO = North Atlantic oscillation
QBO = Quasi-Biennial Oscillation
0 likes   

User avatar
RNS
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: Saylorsburg PA
Contact:

#5 Postby RNS » Fri Nov 28, 2003 4:58 pm

also...if one crosses these paramaters with the current goings on in the pacific...(aside from the QBo phase) one may be able to expect at least the potential for a major eastern US winter storm this season
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

Re: Comparing Various factors to Major east coast snowstorms

#6 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Nov 28, 2003 5:30 pm

Excellent discussion, RNS.

Also, for what it's worth, Dr. Joe D'Aleo wrote an article in 1998 that assessed a number of these factors during "Kocin snowstorms." With regard to the monthly NAO of the 28 such storms:

4 occurred with a montly NAO less than -1
14 occurred with a montly NAO between -1 and 0
8 occurred with a monthly NAO between 0 and +1
2 occurred with a monthly NAO greater than +1 (but not greater than 1.1)
0 likes   

User avatar
RNS
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:29 pm
Location: Saylorsburg PA
Contact:

#7 Postby RNS » Fri Nov 28, 2003 5:42 pm

thanks don...but overall though a negative NAO in the classic form (greenland block) is prefered when looking for a major coast event, which my research has shown. I did a similar study on this in 2001 (after the march storm bust) and drew for the most part the same conclusions to what Dr D' Aleo found. IMO...if used in conjunction with proper analysis of the pattern...these methods can prove to be very effective in forecasting major east coast snow events. i did not publish on the subject at the time...though i still have the article and currently considering doing so eventhough its two years after the fact. there is much to profit from connecting these features with one another...so i am considering it once again though would like more time to test my theory.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#8 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Nov 28, 2003 5:57 pm

I fully agree with you, RNS.

Also, for what it's worth, with regard to NYC and its "snowy months" (at least 10" snowfall) the following is true with regard to having a negative NAO:

November/December: 68% (n=25)
January/February: 54% (n=98)
March/April: 65% (n=20)

Also, I again fully agree that the Greenland Block is most definitely preferred preceding major East Coast events, especially those in which Coastal cities (NYC through Boston) received substantial amounts of snow.
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests