Ntxw wrote:somethingfunny wrote:I thought we were discussing the early March storm.
No, the system is moving into the Pac NW as we speak it will be at our doorstep in 48-72 hours
http://i46.tinypic.com/16biszn.gif
Wow! We're practically into NAM range already.

I'm going to share a few images now, but don't think that they necessarily represent my prediction for this one.



NWS Fort Worth, 4am AFD wrote:THE NEXT UPPER LEVEL SYSTEM THAT WILL AFFECT US IS CURRENTLY OVER
THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. A PIECE OF THIS SYSTEM WILL DIG SOUTHEAST
INTO THE FOUR CORNERS AREA AND CUT OFF BY MIDDAY SUNDAY. THIS
SYSTEM WILL THEN TRACK INTO TEXAS DURING THE DAY MONDAY. ALMOST
ALL OF THE MODEL SOLUTIONS ARE FARTHER SOUTH THAN THEY WERE 24
HOURS AGO. THE ECMWF AND GEM SOLUTION INDICATE THAT THE UPPER
LEVEL LOW WILL TREK EAST CLOSE TO THE I-20/I-30 CORRIDOR ACROSS
TEXAS. ON THE OTHER HAND...THE 00Z GFS SHOWS A WEAKER SYSTEM THAT
WILL SLIDE ACROSS THE TEXAS PANHANDLE INTO OKLAHOMA. THE
DIFFERENCES IN THE MODEL SOLUTIONS POSE A FORECAST PROBLEM. THE
ECMWF SOLUTION BRINGS A CHANCE OF AT LEAST A RAIN/SNOW MIX TO THE
NORTHERN THIRD OF NORTH TEXAS MONDAY AND MONDAY NIGHT WHEREAS THE
GFS SOLUTION WOULD RESULT IN ALL RAIN. BELIEVE THAT FOR NOW THE
BEST THING TO DO IS TO DO A COMPROMISE BETWEEN THE ECMWF/GEM AND
THE GFS...LEANING MORE TOWARD THE FORMER THAN THE LATTER. THUS
HAVE INTRODUCED RAIN/SNOW MIX ACROSS THE NORTHERN MOST COUNTIES.
GIVEN THE UNCERTAINTY...WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO SEE SOME WINTRY
PRECIPITATION FARTHER SOUTH...BUT CONFIDENCE IS NOT HIGH ENOUGH
TO WARRANT MENTIONING IT IN THE OFFICIAL FORECAST YET.