Ntxw wrote:Texas Snow wrote:Lol the model battle continues with the GFS 0z
Without bias of what I want, if you were to present me the scenarios of the GFS vs. some of the Hi Res at this close range it’s not even a battle. But with its consistency I’m at least considering some of it’s assumptions are correct even if the outputs I’m not 100% sure will pan out. I still think it’s a blend of areal coverage of the “other side” but without their crazy amounts as represented more so here
I think tomorrow night we will finally get an idea of which “side” will win
There really is no winning or losing side. We're all going to get some snow. We have continued to drum the beat the GFS is out to lunch with the thermal profile. You have one of the coldest soundings we've seen, and it expects some rain? It's already slowly giving up on that idea...right before it happens.
Just to clarify I don’t mean winning or losing as to any of us as storm2K posters. Even though this close folks still read the models vastly differently, I hope we all win with this storm.
I am referring to the say 72 hour+ models facing off with the GFS and icon versus pretty much everyone else. “Who” wins, who loses, or do they meet in the middle in some Happy la la land where we all win?
Looking back and learning will be key for all of us forecasting the next storm (which will hopefully happen by late January!)