



Moderator: S2k Moderators
RNS wrote:and the GFS solution is even worse...it phases the vort max associated with the closed low with the trough to the north and absoarbs it. thats BS...the GFS bias of over phasing things takes center state here...
http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... 0_102l.gif
RNS wrote:aside from the GFS over phasing bias it may be the tropical interaction thats giving the models problems
It's much more defined with a clear low-level circulation.
Yes, there's less convection, but you can be a bit mislead if all you look at is IR.
A defined LLC with limited convection has more chance of developing than a lot of convection with no circulation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests