ATL: BARRY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#61 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:57 pm

ouragans wrote:
cycloneye wrote:the other site of Best Track files is working.

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/btk/


OK this explains why tropicalatlantic.com didnot reflect 93L, and WUnderground did... Thanks for the info


Ouragans, love your avatar. :D
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#62 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:01 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Look at the latest rgb. That convergence zone / inflow band you noted, Aric, is blowing up convection along it and look at the explosion of convection near where we expect the center is forming/consolidating. Wow!



looking at the loop notice the convection right on the coast of the north east side of Honduras its nearly stationary and almost back building to the ese.. meaning the center may actually be plenty offshore where we have been saying it.


Yeah the center is definitely forming well offshore and this has much more of a northerly component at the moment than I thought it would. Once it consolidates I would still think it will go mostly west due to the expansive ridge north of it, but the die is already cast that it will land further north in Belize than we thought.

I'm getting pretty good at locating the center of developing disturbances but I learned it all from you, lol. :wink:
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#63 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:05 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Look at the latest rgb. That convergence zone / inflow band you noted, Aric, is blowing up convection along it and look at the explosion of convection near where we expect the center is forming/consolidating. Wow!



looking at the loop notice the convection right on the coast of the north east side of Honduras its nearly stationary and almost back building to the ese.. meaning the center may actually be plenty offshore where we have been saying it.


Yeah the center is definitely forming well offshore and this has much more of a northerly component at the moment than I thought it would. Once it consolidates I would still think it will go mostly west due to the expansive ridge north of it, but the die is already cast that it will land further north in Belize than we thought.

I'm getting pretty good at locating the center of developing disturbances but I learned it all from you, lol. :wink:


haha nice ! :) just years of doing the weather thing... found im very able to naturally distinguish between the multilayer's of atmospheric motion.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7284
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#64 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:07 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:Look at the latest rgb. That convergence zone / inflow band you noted, Aric, is blowing up convection along it and look at the explosion of convection near where we expect the center is forming/consolidating. Wow!



looking at the loop notice the convection right on the coast of the north east side of Honduras its nearly stationary and almost back building to the ese.. meaning the center may actually be plenty offshore where we have been saying it.


Yeah the center is definitely forming well offshore and this has much more of a northerly component at the moment than I thought it would. Once it consolidates I would still think it will go mostly west due to the expansive ridge north of it, but the die is already cast that it will land further north in Belize than we thought.

I'm getting pretty good at locating the center of developing disturbances but I learned it all from you, lol. :wink:


Wouldn't be suprised if it missed Belieze just to the north, but from there I do expect a north of due west direction due to ridging, but theres always a chance its overestimating the ridging especially early in its lifetime but the ridge will hold it in the BOC but where is the difference of a redevelopment to a minimal TS in the BOC and a Hurricane in the BOC so its wait and see
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#65 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:11 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
looking at the loop notice the convection right on the coast of the north east side of Honduras its nearly stationary and almost back building to the ese.. meaning the center may actually be plenty offshore where we have been saying it.


Yeah the center is definitely forming well offshore and this has much more of a northerly component at the moment than I thought it would. Once it consolidates I would still think it will go mostly west due to the expansive ridge north of it, but the die is already cast that it will land further north in Belize than we thought.

I'm getting pretty good at locating the center of developing disturbances but I learned it all from you, lol. :wink:


Wouldn't be suprised if it missed Belieze just to the north, but from there I do expect a north of due west direction due to ridging, but theres always a chance its overestimating the ridging especially early in its lifetime but the ridge will hold it in the BOC but where is the difference of a redevelopment to a minimal TS in the BOC and a Hurricane in the BOC so its wait and see



its not that anything is over estimating the ridge... just that its under estimating the dynamics when you get large convective burst that pull and tug vorticities around.

I described what was likely going to happen yesterday in the other thread that the upper divergence was likely going develop a large amount of convection to the north that would pull everything north and it did. large amounts of convection in general have lower pressure than immediate around them thus creating a hole or place for everything to fall into or pulled too.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#66 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:14 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:Wouldn't be suprised if it missed Belieze just to the north, but from there I do expect a north of due west direction due to ridging, but theres always a chance its overestimating the ridging especially early in its lifetime but the ridge will hold it in the BOC but where is the difference of a redevelopment to a minimal TS in the BOC and a Hurricane in the BOC so its wait and see


Agree with all you've been saying, including that it could make southern Yucatan. Just my opinion, but I think this will easily make TS and could be a fairly strong one by landfall. Look at the convection exploding so close to where we have identified the COC. This has a lot of potential. Never underestimate developing TCs in this area.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 25
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#67 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:15 pm

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

My first chance for development forecast is 60%. It is close to land, but so organized. Note: That is not 60% in next 48 hours, but 60% overall.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
ouragans
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 468
Age: 52
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 12:09 pm
Location: Abymes, Guadeloupe F.W.I
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#68 Postby ouragans » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:16 pm

ozonepete wrote:Ouragans, love your avatar. :D


thanks :oops: , it's a home-made logo for my website http://www.ouragans.com :roll:
0 likes   
Personal forecast disclaimer
This post is a personal point of view, not an information. Please refer to official statements for life-threatening decisions.

David '79, Frederic '79, Hugo '89, Iris, Luis & Marilyn '95, Georges '98, Lenny '99, Dean '07, Irma '17, Maria '17, Fiona '22, Philippe '23, Tammy '23
16°13'33.3,"6N -61°36'39.5"W

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7284
Age: 43
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#69 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:17 pm

I'm just wondering are they sending recon to 93L
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#70 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:18 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:Wouldn't be suprised if it missed Belieze just to the north, but from there I do expect a north of due west direction due to ridging, but theres always a chance its overestimating the ridging especially early in its lifetime but the ridge will hold it in the BOC but where is the difference of a redevelopment to a minimal TS in the BOC and a Hurricane in the BOC so its wait and see


Agree with all you've been saying, including that it could make southern Yucatan. Just my opinion, but I think this will easily make TS and could be a fairly strong one by landfall. Look at the convection exploding so close to where we have identified the COC. This has a lot of potential. Never underestimate developing TCs in this area.



it is going to be a very large area of convection over night check out all the over shooting tops ! bunch of hot towers developing too.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#71 Postby NDG » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:18 pm

I have not had a chance to look at surface reports but I agree with Aric and some others that it appears that an LLC might be developing offshore.
The outflow and UL winds look amazing for this time of the year.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#72 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:18 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:I'm just wondering are they sending recon to 93L


Tentatively scheduled for tomorrow I think, right Luis?
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#73 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:20 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
it is going to be a very large area of convection over night check out all the over shooting tops ! bunch of hot towers developing too.


I don't remember ever seeing this many overshooting tops in a developing TC like this.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 26
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#74 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:20 pm

The maximzed upper-level divergance is centered almost exactly where a low-level circulation seems to be organizing. Maybe a tad farther west.

Image

ozonepete wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:I'm just wondering are they sending recon to 93L


Tentatively scheduled for tomorrow I think, right Luis?

I'm not Luis but I think he's away the moment. Recon is scheduled to take off at 17z (1pm EDT).
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#75 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:22 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
it is going to be a very large area of convection over night check out all the over shooting tops ! bunch of hot towers developing too.


I don't remember ever seeing this many overshooting tops in a developing TC like this.



well there have been plenty but i remember wilma right here just exploded ... not saying it will be wilma !

and mitch !
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139503
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#76 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:24 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
it is going to be a very large area of convection over night check out all the over shooting tops ! bunch of hot towers developing too.


I don't remember ever seeing this many overshooting tops in a developing TC like this.



well there have been plenty but i remember wilma right here just exploded ... not saying it will be wilma !

and mitch !


And Iris.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#77 Postby NDG » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:31 pm

Surface pressures are now dropping, something that was not happening earlier today.

Pressure at this buoy is now 3mb lower than 24 hrs ago.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42057
0 likes   

User avatar
sunnyday
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1580
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 8:16 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#78 Postby sunnyday » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:31 pm

Wilma was over that way and turned around and headed east, right? Any chance of that happening here? 8-) 8-)
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#79 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:32 pm

sunnyday wrote:Wilma was over that way and turned around and headed east, right? Any chance of that happening here? 8-) 8-)


NOPE :)
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#80 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:34 pm

safe to say the initialization of the models are just a little off now lol given the development of the day.....

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests